American Reform
03.05.202500:15
Very good read on conclave frontrunner, Cardinal Aveline.
An outline of his views on Talmudic-rabbinical Judaism from his own writing (translated from the original French), compared to Catholic doctrine. The latter which is primarily expressed in various papal bulls, writings of doctors and saints, as well as the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Church.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/conclave-frontrunner-cardinal-avelines-views-on-judaism-subvert-church-teaching/
An outline of his views on Talmudic-rabbinical Judaism from his own writing (translated from the original French), compared to Catholic doctrine. The latter which is primarily expressed in various papal bulls, writings of doctors and saints, as well as the ordinary and universal magisterium of the Church.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/conclave-frontrunner-cardinal-avelines-views-on-judaism-subvert-church-teaching/
28.04.202513:12
Q. Is the example of Pope Honorius I a historical precedent for the present crisis in the Church?
A.
I. Pope Honorius I did not universally impose error on the Church, thus compromising Her indefectability, meaning there can be no comparison to the present crisis in the Church. In short, the historical analog fails.
II. Honorius was only condemned in a very particular sense: “From this, I conclude that Honorius could have been condemned as a heretic by these three councils, and that he in fact was, not for having taught error, but solely for not having exerted the necessary vigor in his duties as Head of the Church, for not having vigorously used his authority to repress heresy, for having prescribed silence about the manner of expressing a truth, and having thus contributed to the diffusion of error.
This is the same conclusion which was reached by almost everyone who dealt with this question during the Vatican Council. Dom Guéranger, Abbot of the Solesmes Benedictines, said on the matter, ‘The real Sixth Council, the one to which the Roman Pontiff gave the necessary and canonical form, the one which requires the respect of the faithful, condemned Honorius only as an unfaithful guardian of the deposit of the faith, but not as having himself been an adherent of heresy. Justice and truth forbid us from going beyond that.’” - Fr. Louis-Nazaire Bégin, The Primacy and Infallibility of the Soverign Pontiffs: The Case of Pope Honorius I, 1873
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1916841814700535994?s=46
A.
I. Pope Honorius I did not universally impose error on the Church, thus compromising Her indefectability, meaning there can be no comparison to the present crisis in the Church. In short, the historical analog fails.
II. Honorius was only condemned in a very particular sense: “From this, I conclude that Honorius could have been condemned as a heretic by these three councils, and that he in fact was, not for having taught error, but solely for not having exerted the necessary vigor in his duties as Head of the Church, for not having vigorously used his authority to repress heresy, for having prescribed silence about the manner of expressing a truth, and having thus contributed to the diffusion of error.
This is the same conclusion which was reached by almost everyone who dealt with this question during the Vatican Council. Dom Guéranger, Abbot of the Solesmes Benedictines, said on the matter, ‘The real Sixth Council, the one to which the Roman Pontiff gave the necessary and canonical form, the one which requires the respect of the faithful, condemned Honorius only as an unfaithful guardian of the deposit of the faith, but not as having himself been an adherent of heresy. Justice and truth forbid us from going beyond that.’” - Fr. Louis-Nazaire Bégin, The Primacy and Infallibility of the Soverign Pontiffs: The Case of Pope Honorius I, 1873
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1916841814700535994?s=46
22.04.202514:59
Msgr. Henri Delassus highlights the similarities between the Talmudic messiah, whom the religious Jews await, and the antichrist.
“Make no mistake; the traits of the Talmudic messiah are indeed the traits of the Antichrist. It is the same sinister character who is announced from both sides [I am come in the name of my Father and you receive me not, but when another will come in his own name, you will receive him, John 5:43]: a man of the Jewish race who will become king of the Jews and will concentrate in his heart, his discourses and his works, all that the malice of the centuries could pit against Our Lord Jesus Christ and his Church. And God, for the completion of His mysterious designs, will allow him for a time to control the most formidable empire all over the world.”
“Make no mistake; the traits of the Talmudic messiah are indeed the traits of the Antichrist. It is the same sinister character who is announced from both sides [I am come in the name of my Father and you receive me not, but when another will come in his own name, you will receive him, John 5:43]: a man of the Jewish race who will become king of the Jews and will concentrate in his heart, his discourses and his works, all that the malice of the centuries could pit against Our Lord Jesus Christ and his Church. And God, for the completion of His mysterious designs, will allow him for a time to control the most formidable empire all over the world.”
16.04.202521:59
My answer, using proofs from popes, saints and Catholic prelates is below:
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1912624918316929161?s=46
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1912624918316929161?s=46
10.04.202500:26
Bishop Alois Hudal outlines the Christian view of race and its importance, while highlighting certain dangers present in racial radicalism.
For the positive side of racial doctrine, the learned bishop remarked, “Race is more than a purely intellectual abstraction. It is a truism that the biological groups of humankind, the races, are not characterized by one or more characteristics, but by a typical overall habitus. This means that the heritability of mental abilities is perhaps possible within certain limits, even though scientific results have not yet brought complete clarity on the details...”
A lengthier treatment of the racial question can be found in his 1937 book, entitled Foundations of National Socialism, at the following (link)
For the positive side of racial doctrine, the learned bishop remarked, “Race is more than a purely intellectual abstraction. It is a truism that the biological groups of humankind, the races, are not characterized by one or more characteristics, but by a typical overall habitus. This means that the heritability of mental abilities is perhaps possible within certain limits, even though scientific results have not yet brought complete clarity on the details...”
A lengthier treatment of the racial question can be found in his 1937 book, entitled Foundations of National Socialism, at the following (link)
07.04.202513:33
In November of 2006, Benedict XVI traveled to Istanbul to pray with the Moslems. Upon entering the Blue Mosque, he removed his shoes to observe Islamic custom and, walking to the mihrab, crossed his arms, lowered his head and prayed alongside the Great Mufti.
Link to video (Rome Reports) of the joint-prayer (here)
Link to video (Rome Reports) of the joint-prayer (here)
01.05.202503:00
My main purpose of the above post was to draw attention to the considerable merits of the National Socialist program and to, frankly, ridicule the way “Nazi” is popularly used as a pejorative and used dismissively—oftentimes dishonestly. They, the Germans, got much more right than most people are comfortable admitting, self-styled traditional Catholics (certainly) being no exception. Additionally, with the benefit of hindsight, many of the problems we face today are the direct result of demonizing, in a histrionic and irrational way, “Nazism” and those who are “Nazis”. Right or wrong, descriptively, that is the situation in the world’s most powerful country, America.
The principles of true Catholic political philosophy transcend any one regime or point in time, they are independent of circumstances. As a historical-political system, National Socialism should receive no preferential treatment, nor contempt, and be weighed on its merits. The authority of the Church, particularly in MBS, should be the principal guide, coupled with good history and Catholics on the ground in the Third Reich. We should outline the bad, careful to avoid exaggeration, and we should identify the good, equally careful not to exaggerate. This is decidedly not what happens today, or has ever happened. The elephant in the room preventing this honest discussion is Jewry. The same power structure that the world was so keen on allying with, against the Germans and the other Axis Powers. The Jews have ascended since WW2, dominating the Americas and Europe, and the formerly Christian nations have paid the highest price for it. We all live, whether we admit it or not, in “fear of the Jews”.
I do not think we should resurrect National Socialism or any party dedicated to it. Their time has passed and we are not Germans. We live in America and we need to apply Catholic political philosophy to our—somewhat unique—circumstances. That does not mean, however, that the National Socialist system it is to be discarded or for us to pretend it is without instructive value. However, a new solution is needed for our problems, something that challenges—most importantly in a moral and legal way—the, fundamentally, wicked principles of America: naturalism, revolutionism, liberalism and individualism. In short, what is needed is a program of supernaturalism and all that entails. Christ must reign over all of public life. America’s original sin is revolution, her founding, and until we atone for it and lovingly correct our mistaken ways, we will not be a good country, let alone a great one.
Finally, there is a real difference between Marxism and National Socialism, in that the former was condemned by the Church, without qualification, whereas the critique of the latter was—which did condemn radical elements of the movement—not categorical, but incidental, and focused on excesses. Real, dangerous excesses but not without ruling out compatibility with Catholicism. This is why the distinction between Christian and unchristian National Socialism is hugely important. Reading Abp. Hudal’s book on the question, where he argued for a bridge between Catholicism and National Socialism, has given clarity on the issue for me.
The principles of true Catholic political philosophy transcend any one regime or point in time, they are independent of circumstances. As a historical-political system, National Socialism should receive no preferential treatment, nor contempt, and be weighed on its merits. The authority of the Church, particularly in MBS, should be the principal guide, coupled with good history and Catholics on the ground in the Third Reich. We should outline the bad, careful to avoid exaggeration, and we should identify the good, equally careful not to exaggerate. This is decidedly not what happens today, or has ever happened. The elephant in the room preventing this honest discussion is Jewry. The same power structure that the world was so keen on allying with, against the Germans and the other Axis Powers. The Jews have ascended since WW2, dominating the Americas and Europe, and the formerly Christian nations have paid the highest price for it. We all live, whether we admit it or not, in “fear of the Jews”.
I do not think we should resurrect National Socialism or any party dedicated to it. Their time has passed and we are not Germans. We live in America and we need to apply Catholic political philosophy to our—somewhat unique—circumstances. That does not mean, however, that the National Socialist system it is to be discarded or for us to pretend it is without instructive value. However, a new solution is needed for our problems, something that challenges—most importantly in a moral and legal way—the, fundamentally, wicked principles of America: naturalism, revolutionism, liberalism and individualism. In short, what is needed is a program of supernaturalism and all that entails. Christ must reign over all of public life. America’s original sin is revolution, her founding, and until we atone for it and lovingly correct our mistaken ways, we will not be a good country, let alone a great one.
Finally, there is a real difference between Marxism and National Socialism, in that the former was condemned by the Church, without qualification, whereas the critique of the latter was—which did condemn radical elements of the movement—not categorical, but incidental, and focused on excesses. Real, dangerous excesses but not without ruling out compatibility with Catholicism. This is why the distinction between Christian and unchristian National Socialism is hugely important. Reading Abp. Hudal’s book on the question, where he argued for a bridge between Catholicism and National Socialism, has given clarity on the issue for me.
28.04.202502:15
In 1933, Bishop Johannes Maria Gföllner, after observing that “many godless Jews exert an excessively harmful influence on almost all areas of modern cultural life”, said that “breaking this harmful influence of Judaism” is a “strict duty of conscience of every convinced Christian”.
Following that challenge, the Bishop of Linz hoped that for the “Aryan and Christian sides, these dangers and harms caused by the Jewish spirit would be more appreciated and more sustainably combatted”.
Following that challenge, the Bishop of Linz hoped that for the “Aryan and Christian sides, these dangers and harms caused by the Jewish spirit would be more appreciated and more sustainably combatted”.
22.04.202513:23
Rooting for the election of a conservative pope at the coming conclave, as opposed to a potential liberal contender, betrays a mistaken view of the Catholic religion. To illustrate, Pope Benedict XV taught in his encyclical Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, “Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected: ‘This is the Catholic faith, which unless a man believe faithfully and firmly; he cannot be saved’ (Athanas. Creed)”. Put another way, the Catholic religion does not admit of degrees. There can be no conservative brand or school of Catholicism, only Orthodoxy. Similarly, there is no liberal or progressive school of Catholicism, again, only Orthodoxy. The existence of various and competing strains of Catholicism, that are legitimate to a greater or lesser extent, would imply a denial of the unity of the Church of Christ, in which all men must profess the same Faith. Without this mark of unity, the religion in question is, necessarily, false. A popular expression which captures this line of thinking is “the fullness of the faith”. Though often used innocently enough, it is just as alien to the Catholic religion as it is deadly.
Continuing, the reality of a dialectic between conservative [liberal] prelates and progressive [liberal] prelates in the Church is merely the effect of a much deeper problem—the crisis in the Church since Vatican II. This problem must be studied by those who are exercising their Faith. Then, once diagnosed, the true cause identified.
Before ending, it is necessary to make a distinction. What is not ruled out in a papal conclave is a diversity of views, attitudes and approaches among prelates in the practical order or, perhaps, differing views on unsettled theological questions, both distinct—strictly speaking—from the doctrinal order. These differences, so long as they are circumscribed by the Faith, are, indeed, legitimate. Doctrinal diversity, on the other hand, would be nothing but a euphemism for heterodoxy.
Continuing, the reality of a dialectic between conservative [liberal] prelates and progressive [liberal] prelates in the Church is merely the effect of a much deeper problem—the crisis in the Church since Vatican II. This problem must be studied by those who are exercising their Faith. Then, once diagnosed, the true cause identified.
Before ending, it is necessary to make a distinction. What is not ruled out in a papal conclave is a diversity of views, attitudes and approaches among prelates in the practical order or, perhaps, differing views on unsettled theological questions, both distinct—strictly speaking—from the doctrinal order. These differences, so long as they are circumscribed by the Faith, are, indeed, legitimate. Doctrinal diversity, on the other hand, would be nothing but a euphemism for heterodoxy.
16.04.202520:26
What a relief for Christians and White Americans, Mr. Weinstein, for you two to have this discussion.
Two Jews, one is a liberal agnostic and the other a liberal atheist, are publicly, yet very respectfully, dialoguing about Israel and the war in Gaza on behalf of the American public. This discussion is—in part—a reflection on a recent argument advanced by a British sodomite and Zionist, Douglas Murray (it is unclear if he is/was “married” to a Jew), who is more devoted to Israel than either of the two Jewish ethnics. Incidentally, this argument was just put forward on the world’s biggest and, perhaps, most influential podcast. Weinstein also talked about Daryl Cooper and was happy that his provocative comments about Winston Churchill were just that, provocative, meant to “rib” his friends, and only half-serious. After all, Weinstein and Smith both agree Hitler was a genocidal maniac.
Oh, and during the segment Eric mentioned that on Twitter, he “cannot walk a foot without being covered by antisemitic leeches”, and that he “understand[s] the same thing has been happening to [Dave]”.
Truly a mystery why those “antisemitic leeches” won’t leave them alone.
https://x.com/ericrweinstein/status/1912245874253808084?s=46
Two Jews, one is a liberal agnostic and the other a liberal atheist, are publicly, yet very respectfully, dialoguing about Israel and the war in Gaza on behalf of the American public. This discussion is—in part—a reflection on a recent argument advanced by a British sodomite and Zionist, Douglas Murray (it is unclear if he is/was “married” to a Jew), who is more devoted to Israel than either of the two Jewish ethnics. Incidentally, this argument was just put forward on the world’s biggest and, perhaps, most influential podcast. Weinstein also talked about Daryl Cooper and was happy that his provocative comments about Winston Churchill were just that, provocative, meant to “rib” his friends, and only half-serious. After all, Weinstein and Smith both agree Hitler was a genocidal maniac.
Oh, and during the segment Eric mentioned that on Twitter, he “cannot walk a foot without being covered by antisemitic leeches”, and that he “understand[s] the same thing has been happening to [Dave]”.
Truly a mystery why those “antisemitic leeches” won’t leave them alone.
https://x.com/ericrweinstein/status/1912245874253808084?s=46
09.04.202519:27
Correcting Eric Sammons’ promotion of Ron Paul - (link)
A system of thought is not measured by the sincerity of its exponent, rather by the soundness of its principles and the merit of its arguments. Most importantly, the philosophy—Ron Paul libertarianism is no exception—must be compatible with the Catholic understanding of natural law, authority, the social character of man, subjection of the economy to the law of morality, union between Church and State, the basis of rights and duties—to name just a few.
America is descending further and further into godlessness, individualism and immorality not, as many seem to think, in spite of the liberalism of Ron Paul, on the contrary, precisely because of it. The poisonous and anti-authoritarian liberalism he promotes is all the more dangerous given how sincere and amiable he is, as a man. Ron Paul has many gifts and gets some things right but, objectively, he is leading many astray.
For these reasons, Ron Paul is not, nor ever will be an American hero. Individualism is subversive of the very notion of society and is holding America back from true reform. He also is a rationalist, perhaps only a moderate one, who has divorced reason from Divine and Ecclesiastical authority, and foments suspicion about the authority and legitimacy, in principle, of the State, and its important role to play in helping men attain temporal happiness, to say nothing of Eternal Beatitude.
From the above clip, Dave Smith, a Jew, talking to Lex Fridman, another Jew, accurately characterizes the central thesis of Ron Paul (and every other libertarian) by saying, “the highest political value ought to be liberty”.
1. Liberty is not the highest good of man, rather it is merely the act of the will choosing (electing) *moral* means to achieve a particular *good* end.
2. As such, liberty must, by its nature, have the good and truth as its object, otherwise it is a false liberty, properly called license. Put similarly, choosing evil is a defect of liberty, it is a false liberty.
3. Nor is liberty defined as the power to choose between good and evil—which is a very popular and false view—otherwise God, who has perfect freedom, would, Himself, not be free.
Pope Leo XIII, in his landmark encyclical teaching about true, Christian liberty, Libertas, lays out the above more thoroughly.
A system of thought is not measured by the sincerity of its exponent, rather by the soundness of its principles and the merit of its arguments. Most importantly, the philosophy—Ron Paul libertarianism is no exception—must be compatible with the Catholic understanding of natural law, authority, the social character of man, subjection of the economy to the law of morality, union between Church and State, the basis of rights and duties—to name just a few.
America is descending further and further into godlessness, individualism and immorality not, as many seem to think, in spite of the liberalism of Ron Paul, on the contrary, precisely because of it. The poisonous and anti-authoritarian liberalism he promotes is all the more dangerous given how sincere and amiable he is, as a man. Ron Paul has many gifts and gets some things right but, objectively, he is leading many astray.
For these reasons, Ron Paul is not, nor ever will be an American hero. Individualism is subversive of the very notion of society and is holding America back from true reform. He also is a rationalist, perhaps only a moderate one, who has divorced reason from Divine and Ecclesiastical authority, and foments suspicion about the authority and legitimacy, in principle, of the State, and its important role to play in helping men attain temporal happiness, to say nothing of Eternal Beatitude.
From the above clip, Dave Smith, a Jew, talking to Lex Fridman, another Jew, accurately characterizes the central thesis of Ron Paul (and every other libertarian) by saying, “the highest political value ought to be liberty”.
1. Liberty is not the highest good of man, rather it is merely the act of the will choosing (electing) *moral* means to achieve a particular *good* end.
2. As such, liberty must, by its nature, have the good and truth as its object, otherwise it is a false liberty, properly called license. Put similarly, choosing evil is a defect of liberty, it is a false liberty.
3. Nor is liberty defined as the power to choose between good and evil—which is a very popular and false view—otherwise God, who has perfect freedom, would, Himself, not be free.
Pope Leo XIII, in his landmark encyclical teaching about true, Christian liberty, Libertas, lays out the above more thoroughly.
31.03.202512:05
What do the Jews, particularly the religious ones, think about Our Lord Jesus Christ and His followers, as found in their ‘holy’ books?
30.04.202518:44
All of the moral horror and opprobrium directed towards the National Socialist program, almost always misguided and devoid of any serious, Catholic analysis, ought to be leveled with an even greater intensity—orders of magnitude more—at the program of Donald Trump and the Republican Party. That is, if people were consistent in their moral analyses.
German National Socialism got many important things correct, namely its repudiation of individualism, liberal capitalism and, to a good extent, an appreciation of a pre-1789 (the religion of human rights, secularism and enlightenment principles) political order. Recent history has vindicated their intransigence, opposition to Jewish power and commitment to maintaining national and racial identities.
That said, any serious critiques, which are warranted, must begin with a critical distinction between Christian and unchristian strains within the movement. To present a blanket condemnation of National Socialism, making no such distinction or appreciation of the many things it got right, is to betray any pretense of seriousness.
German National Socialism got many important things correct, namely its repudiation of individualism, liberal capitalism and, to a good extent, an appreciation of a pre-1789 (the religion of human rights, secularism and enlightenment principles) political order. Recent history has vindicated their intransigence, opposition to Jewish power and commitment to maintaining national and racial identities.
That said, any serious critiques, which are warranted, must begin with a critical distinction between Christian and unchristian strains within the movement. To present a blanket condemnation of National Socialism, making no such distinction or appreciation of the many things it got right, is to betray any pretense of seriousness.
26.04.202500:45
The post is live! 🔔
New release for The Journal of American Reform, entitled “The Dispersion of Israel in the Modern World” by Fr. Raffaele Ballerini, S.J.
“The Jew always continues to be immutably Jewish in every place. His nationality is not in the soil where he was born, it is not in the language he speaks; it is in the seed, in the lineage and in that mixture of Bible, Talmud and Kabbalah, which he calls his history and his religion [...] Everywhere he is a stranger to all, except those with whom he shares his origin and curse. Outside of his own interest, he has no other political aim, wherever he lives.”
Use the link (here) to read the entire article.
If you have not already, consider Subscribing to receive new posts directly to your inbox or app.
New release for The Journal of American Reform, entitled “The Dispersion of Israel in the Modern World” by Fr. Raffaele Ballerini, S.J.
“The Jew always continues to be immutably Jewish in every place. His nationality is not in the soil where he was born, it is not in the language he speaks; it is in the seed, in the lineage and in that mixture of Bible, Talmud and Kabbalah, which he calls his history and his religion [...] Everywhere he is a stranger to all, except those with whom he shares his origin and curse. Outside of his own interest, he has no other political aim, wherever he lives.”
Use the link (here) to read the entire article.
If you have not already, consider Subscribing to receive new posts directly to your inbox or app.
21.04.202500:50
Christ is Risen! I hope everyone and their family had a wonderful Easter Sunday.
May the celebration of Our Lord’s glorious resurrection continue throughout the entire Easter Octave.
May the celebration of Our Lord’s glorious resurrection continue throughout the entire Easter Octave.
16.04.202500:54
Pope Leo XIII, in his landmark 1888 encyclical Libertas Praestantissimum, which carefully distinguishes between true liberty, Christian liberty, and its liberal and modern counterpart, what is rather false liberty, outlines the duties of the State towards God and religion. As explained in the encyclical, liberty, detached from its object, namely objective truth and goodness, becomes license and—in fact—is no liberty at all.
In particular, after rejecting the absurdity of liberty of worship, based on the false principle, religious freedom, that every man is free to profess any religion which he so chooses (or none), teaches that is is the duty of the State to worship God in the true religion. This is naturally followed by the obligation of the State to not only assist man in his temporal life, but to help him achieve his eternal salvation—reasonably removing obstacles and promoting virtue in public life.
The full text can be found here: https://www.papalencyclicals.net/leo13/l13liber.htm
In particular, after rejecting the absurdity of liberty of worship, based on the false principle, religious freedom, that every man is free to profess any religion which he so chooses (or none), teaches that is is the duty of the State to worship God in the true religion. This is naturally followed by the obligation of the State to not only assist man in his temporal life, but to help him achieve his eternal salvation—reasonably removing obstacles and promoting virtue in public life.
The full text can be found here: https://www.papalencyclicals.net/leo13/l13liber.htm
08.04.202518:34
🚨 E. Michael Jones Ratio 🚨
Let’s see if we can make this happen! Appreciate all the support.
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1909675677688668192?s=46
Let’s see if we can make this happen! Appreciate all the support.
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1909675677688668192?s=46
29.03.202501:35
Friday ratio on Trent Horn whining about antisemitism?
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1905792877063483466?s=46
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1905792877063483466?s=46
29.04.202513:55
Pope Pius IX and Pope Benedict XV vs. Bp. Athanasius Schneider
“For this mother and teacher of all the churches has always preserved entire and unharmed the faith entrusted to it by Christ the Lord. Furthermore, it has taught it to the faithful, showing all men truth and the path of salvation. Since all priesthood originates in this church, the entire substance of the Christian religion resides there also.” (Qui Pluribus, no. 10-11)
“For in the Apostolic See the Catholic religion has always been preserved unblemished, and sacred doctrine been held in honor […] for they knew very well that this See of St. Peter always remains unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and Savior to the prince of his disciples: ‘I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren.’ This gift of truth and never-failing faith was therefore divinely conferred on Peter and his successors in this See so that they might discharge their exalted office for the salvation of all, and so that the whole flock of Christ might be kept away by them from the poisonous food of error and be nourished with the sustenance of heavenly doctrine.” (Pastor Aeternus, no. 6)
“May through a new Pope, burning with the zeal for the glory of Christ and the salvation of souls, the Lord come to the assistance of the Apostolic See, which in our day is spiritually laying in chains, resembling to the material chains in which the Apostle Peter were put at the beginning of the life of the Church, freeing the Apostolic See from the chains of the alignment with the materialistic, morally depraved and anti-Christian globalist agenda of this world.” (Appeal for a Worldwide Crusade of Prayers for the Upcoming Conclave, para. 3)
“Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected: ‘This is the Catholic faith, which unless a man believe faithfully and firmly; he cannot be saved’(Athanasian Creed). There is no need of adding any qualifying terms to the profession of Catholicism…” (Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, no. 24)
“May all true sons and daughters of the Church import the grace of the election of a new Pope, who will be fully Catholic, fully Apostolic and fully Roman.” (Appeal for a Worldwide Crusade of Prayers for the Upcoming Conclave, para. 5)
Conclusion
Pious-sounding, unapproved prayers are no substitute for Orthodoxy.
Despite any potential good-will, Schneider is undermining the very foundations of the Roman Papacy with his heterodox prayers. A sure sign you are not accurately diagnosing the crisis in the Church correctly—to say nothing of explaining it—is running afoul of basic, Catholic doctrine.
Source for the [heterodox] prayers, published by 1Peter5:
https://onepeterfive.com/appeal-for-a-worldwide-crusade-of-prayers-for-the-upcoming-conclave/
“For this mother and teacher of all the churches has always preserved entire and unharmed the faith entrusted to it by Christ the Lord. Furthermore, it has taught it to the faithful, showing all men truth and the path of salvation. Since all priesthood originates in this church, the entire substance of the Christian religion resides there also.” (Qui Pluribus, no. 10-11)
“For in the Apostolic See the Catholic religion has always been preserved unblemished, and sacred doctrine been held in honor […] for they knew very well that this See of St. Peter always remains unblemished by any error, in accordance with the divine promise of our Lord and Savior to the prince of his disciples: ‘I have prayed for you that your faith may not fail; and when you have turned again, strengthen your brethren.’ This gift of truth and never-failing faith was therefore divinely conferred on Peter and his successors in this See so that they might discharge their exalted office for the salvation of all, and so that the whole flock of Christ might be kept away by them from the poisonous food of error and be nourished with the sustenance of heavenly doctrine.” (Pastor Aeternus, no. 6)
“May through a new Pope, burning with the zeal for the glory of Christ and the salvation of souls, the Lord come to the assistance of the Apostolic See, which in our day is spiritually laying in chains, resembling to the material chains in which the Apostle Peter were put at the beginning of the life of the Church, freeing the Apostolic See from the chains of the alignment with the materialistic, morally depraved and anti-Christian globalist agenda of this world.” (Appeal for a Worldwide Crusade of Prayers for the Upcoming Conclave, para. 3)
“Such is the nature of Catholicism that it does not admit of more or less, but must be held as a whole or as a whole rejected: ‘This is the Catholic faith, which unless a man believe faithfully and firmly; he cannot be saved’(Athanasian Creed). There is no need of adding any qualifying terms to the profession of Catholicism…” (Ad Beatissimi Apostolorum, no. 24)
“May all true sons and daughters of the Church import the grace of the election of a new Pope, who will be fully Catholic, fully Apostolic and fully Roman.” (Appeal for a Worldwide Crusade of Prayers for the Upcoming Conclave, para. 5)
Conclusion
Pious-sounding, unapproved prayers are no substitute for Orthodoxy.
Despite any potential good-will, Schneider is undermining the very foundations of the Roman Papacy with his heterodox prayers. A sure sign you are not accurately diagnosing the crisis in the Church correctly—to say nothing of explaining it—is running afoul of basic, Catholic doctrine.
Source for the [heterodox] prayers, published by 1Peter5:
https://onepeterfive.com/appeal-for-a-worldwide-crusade-of-prayers-for-the-upcoming-conclave/
22.04.202523:04
Eric Sammons boldly condemns Catholic racism, proving his antiracist bonafides, forgetting that Pope Pius XI approved the very views he holds in contempt. https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1914816138166288564?s=46
18.04.202516:29
May everyone have a blessed Good Friday.
10.04.202519:45
Joel Berry, an ethnic Jew, who has now converted to Protestantism and is the managing editor of the Babylon Bee, is asked a simple question and, nearly immediately, blocks my account.
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1910416313672998945?s=46
Least subversive Jew.
https://x.com/americanreform_/status/1910416313672998945?s=46
Least subversive Jew.
07.04.202515:12
Please say a prayer for the grandfather of a close friend who just passed away. The repose of his soul and the grace of God at his death.
Reposted from:
St. Michael's Library
28.03.202515:05
https://x.com/smichaellibrary/status/1905500918386225203?s=46
Michael Knowles’ wife is Jewish
Full credit to Leon DeGroyper for finding the proof
Michael Knowles’ wife is Jewish
Full credit to Leon DeGroyper for finding the proof
Shown 1 - 24 of 66
Log in to unlock more functionality.