The Irish Inquiry
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verifiedTrust
Not trustedLocation
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateSep 09, 2020
Added to TGlist
May 26, 2024Records
03.09.202423:59
4.6KSubscribers08.05.202423:59
0Citation index21.05.202411:02
2.1KAverage views per post05.04.202523:59
744Average views per ad post30.03.202515:39
3.55%ER07.09.202423:59
18.42%ERR
30.03.202513:08
Know thine enemy: Irish people, PAY ATTENTION! You need to start recognising a disturbing reality; our defacto "leaders" are seemingly partaking in a deliberate campaign of demoralising, degrading and goading us. It's a psychological tool of war. Last year they USED Mother's Day to attempt to bolster their campaign of removing "mother" and "woman" from our sacred constitution under grossly false pretences, this year Mother's Day is not even acknowleged, but Eid is (so much for respecting mothers and women... by honouring a religion that views women and girls as second class citizens).
01.04.202517:43
DO THE MATH 👇!! (I’ve done it for you)
Read on below...
Read on below...
26.03.202514:44
You can't add visiting a dead relative to the list of things you can do safely anymore. Some people might fear ghosts in such places, but what about unvetted migrant rapists? (The alleged rapist is a Somalian man; more than 99% of Somalis are Sunni Muslims who follow Sharia law.) Once again, let’s ask ourselves: WHO does it benefit to allow largely undocumented, illegal migrants into our country?
Read on below...
Read on below...
Reposted from:
Ar Aghaidh
08.04.202509:18
VIEW POINT: Have you ever gone to the top of the Eiffel Tower, all 300 metres to the very top excluding the radio mast. The Eiffel Tower is the tallest structure in Paris and is equivalent to the height of an eighty one story building. In contrast the well known and much disliked Poolbeg chimneys on the approach to Dublin Port are only 207 metres in height. These statistics are important because a planning application has been submitted to An Bord Pleanala by developers RWE to construct between 39 and 50 wind turbines, each of which will be 310 meters tall and sited just 10km from the coast line between Dun Laoghaire and Greystones. The blades will be 207 metres in diameter. A European directive for wind turbines states that they should be sited at least 22 km of shore. These proposed wind turbines are part of a chain of wind turbines that will stretch from Dundalk to Wexford and will number an additional 100 turbines.
These turbines are part of a movement towards ‘green’ energy. The claim is that wind turbines are beneficial to the environment, community and the planet. Therefor to oppose them is to be anti environment. Let’s examine that evidence. These turbines will be very visible and oppressive. They will be easily seen from the shore and will dominate the skyline impacting on the quality of life for residents and on the tourist industry. For example they will be just 8•92 Km from Greystones harbour. Also noise carries over water. There are 11,000 tons of blade waste awaiting disposal in Ireland alone. Blades last for about twenty years before needing to be replaced. They are technically difficult to recycle and that’s why the waste is accumulating. Wind Europe describes itself as the ‘voice of the wind industry’ and offers landfill as a solution. So much for ‘green’. It is estimated that blade waste will create 200,000 tons of waste per annum that as of now is heading for landfill. This is just hypocrisy, a form of ‘green washing’ to satisfy optics and woke politics.
The reason why it is proposed to site the turbines so close to the coast is because they will be sited on sandbanks so in relatively shallow water. But in Arklow the siting of the turbines has produced scouring around the site that interferes with fish and bird life and also they have changed tidal patterns causing Brittas Beach to be eroded at the rate of seven metres a year. This just shows the heavy environmental price that must be paid for environmentally sustainable energy. Does anybody see the contradictions, the green hypocrisy. Furthermore wind turbines are detrimental to bird life. Individual figures offered out of context have limited academic value but that’s all we have got when we try to explore this little researched area. But it is estimated that 1•17 million birds are killed per annum by wind farms in the US. Clearly this should be worrying to anybody with a genuinely green conscience.
These are only some of the environmental concerns around wind turbines. There is a tendency to ‘talk up’ green energy giving the downside a free pass. It is unlikely if a single wind turbine ever covers for its carbon footprint from construction to decommissioning. It is reasonable to ask if conventional electricity is not just as green if everything is taken into account. If this is so then the price is too high in terms of visual intrusion along the Dublin and North Wicklow coast line.
The reality is that many of us including our government and fake opposition are enslaved to the pseudoscience of man made climate change and therefor we have signed up to the Paris Protocols on Climate which penalise us financially if we fail to meet targets set by others. There is no allowance for the factual evidence of the historical record that the planet goes through long cooling and warming cycles that are perfectly natural. The need to reach these targets have created an artificial market for ‘green’ energy that is not green. Residents of seasides where wind turbines are sited off shore will pay the price through visual intrusiveness. Stop this now.
These turbines are part of a movement towards ‘green’ energy. The claim is that wind turbines are beneficial to the environment, community and the planet. Therefor to oppose them is to be anti environment. Let’s examine that evidence. These turbines will be very visible and oppressive. They will be easily seen from the shore and will dominate the skyline impacting on the quality of life for residents and on the tourist industry. For example they will be just 8•92 Km from Greystones harbour. Also noise carries over water. There are 11,000 tons of blade waste awaiting disposal in Ireland alone. Blades last for about twenty years before needing to be replaced. They are technically difficult to recycle and that’s why the waste is accumulating. Wind Europe describes itself as the ‘voice of the wind industry’ and offers landfill as a solution. So much for ‘green’. It is estimated that blade waste will create 200,000 tons of waste per annum that as of now is heading for landfill. This is just hypocrisy, a form of ‘green washing’ to satisfy optics and woke politics.
The reason why it is proposed to site the turbines so close to the coast is because they will be sited on sandbanks so in relatively shallow water. But in Arklow the siting of the turbines has produced scouring around the site that interferes with fish and bird life and also they have changed tidal patterns causing Brittas Beach to be eroded at the rate of seven metres a year. This just shows the heavy environmental price that must be paid for environmentally sustainable energy. Does anybody see the contradictions, the green hypocrisy. Furthermore wind turbines are detrimental to bird life. Individual figures offered out of context have limited academic value but that’s all we have got when we try to explore this little researched area. But it is estimated that 1•17 million birds are killed per annum by wind farms in the US. Clearly this should be worrying to anybody with a genuinely green conscience.
These are only some of the environmental concerns around wind turbines. There is a tendency to ‘talk up’ green energy giving the downside a free pass. It is unlikely if a single wind turbine ever covers for its carbon footprint from construction to decommissioning. It is reasonable to ask if conventional electricity is not just as green if everything is taken into account. If this is so then the price is too high in terms of visual intrusion along the Dublin and North Wicklow coast line.
The reality is that many of us including our government and fake opposition are enslaved to the pseudoscience of man made climate change and therefor we have signed up to the Paris Protocols on Climate which penalise us financially if we fail to meet targets set by others. There is no allowance for the factual evidence of the historical record that the planet goes through long cooling and warming cycles that are perfectly natural. The need to reach these targets have created an artificial market for ‘green’ energy that is not green. Residents of seasides where wind turbines are sited off shore will pay the price through visual intrusiveness. Stop this now.
01.04.202515:49
Yet another non-profit telling Irish people how racist they are (while not disclosing who funds them, why not?)
The Unforgettable Women's Network @TUWNIreland (TUWN) talks about "the centrality of race and whiteness in the Irish Labour market" and "microaggressions" against Black women in the Irish workplace.
They do not disclose their public funding but it is likely they receive partial funding from the National Women's Council @NWCI, (and therefore the taxpayer because the NWC receives 80% of their funding from the government) given the NWC counts TUWN as one of its "members" (groups they support).
Last year Jennifer Okeke became the first Black woman to become chairperson of the NWC (seen here pictured in @irishexaminer).
The Unforgettable Women's Network is backed by Dr. @EbunJoseph1 (see here: https://x.com/SuzieD755164/status/1906953958003740742?t=DdAcZR78sUeM0VLbNmXWDQ&s=19) who was recently platformed by RTE news to tell Irish people how racist they are.
The Unforgettable Women's Network @TUWNIreland (TUWN) talks about "the centrality of race and whiteness in the Irish Labour market" and "microaggressions" against Black women in the Irish workplace.
They do not disclose their public funding but it is likely they receive partial funding from the National Women's Council @NWCI, (and therefore the taxpayer because the NWC receives 80% of their funding from the government) given the NWC counts TUWN as one of its "members" (groups they support).
Last year Jennifer Okeke became the first Black woman to become chairperson of the NWC (seen here pictured in @irishexaminer).
The Unforgettable Women's Network is backed by Dr. @EbunJoseph1 (see here: https://x.com/SuzieD755164/status/1906953958003740742?t=DdAcZR78sUeM0VLbNmXWDQ&s=19) who was recently platformed by RTE news to tell Irish people how racist they are.
03.04.202512:01
Stand and Deliver
Conor McGregor must make an appearance and speak at Easter demonstration to prove his credentials.
By: Stephen Sutton
"If Conor McGregor is serious about helping Ireland and the Irish people, he simply must be in attendance on the day. No excuses. It is up to the organisers to reach out to him, to provide for him a platform to address the people he wishes to represent. Going to the White House to alert Irish America as to the nature of our plight was a good thing, addressing the streetwise, cynical, battle-hardened people of your hometown, on the streets where you grew up, could perhaps be an even greater thing. If you are to be taken seriously by nationalists @TheNotoriousMMA, this is an opportunity you must not allow to pass you by. It is a gesture the nationalist community will demand if you are to receive our support going forward."
Read Full Article Here... https://tinyurl.com/mt75nh58
Conor McGregor must make an appearance and speak at Easter demonstration to prove his credentials.
By: Stephen Sutton
"If Conor McGregor is serious about helping Ireland and the Irish people, he simply must be in attendance on the day. No excuses. It is up to the organisers to reach out to him, to provide for him a platform to address the people he wishes to represent. Going to the White House to alert Irish America as to the nature of our plight was a good thing, addressing the streetwise, cynical, battle-hardened people of your hometown, on the streets where you grew up, could perhaps be an even greater thing. If you are to be taken seriously by nationalists @TheNotoriousMMA, this is an opportunity you must not allow to pass you by. It is a gesture the nationalist community will demand if you are to receive our support going forward."
Read Full Article Here... https://tinyurl.com/mt75nh58
07.04.202521:15
Do you agree with what Susanne Delaney says here about people who support Open Borders?
Reposted from:Ar Aghaidh
26.03.202511:10
VIEW POINT: Dr Matthew Doré is the honorary secretary of the Association for Palliative Medicine. He has expressed concern on behalf of his organisation that ‘prognosis’ will be used as a safeguard in allowing patients the right to die in assisted dying legislation proposed for in the UK and that may well be a model for legislation proposed for in this country. The proposed safeguard against abuse is that patients must have a life prognosis of six months or less to avail of the legislation. But it has now been shown that approximately 20% of patients given a prognosis of six months or less are alive after three years. This information arose from a freedom of information request linking urgent payments made to the terminally ill and the length of those payments. 20% were still receiving payment after three years. While this may be surprising for many people it is not too surprising for doctors who have seen dramatic improvements in end of life care in recent years. These statistics just show the difficulties in determining how long somebody is likely to live. The proposed legislation suggests that two doctors will form the opinion that a terminally ill patient has only six months to live. But in 20% of cases these predictions were wrong by a factor of three years. If assisted dying was available and if that option was sought and granted based on that prediction useful life would have been cut off prematurely in many cases.
Reposted from:Ar Aghaidh
25.03.202508:01
VIEW POINT: One of the most important elements of research is long term follow up so that unintended consequences of therapy can be identified and adjustments made. That may result in a drug or therapy being withdrawn or modified. Some long term follow ups have lasted for decades and are still ongoing. Studies on cardiovascular health and studies on the influence of diet particularly spring to mind. These are universally agreed safeguards embraced by all branches of medicine with one exception. That exception is transgender care.
What is remarkable about transgender care is the total absence of quality long term follow up studies. This glaring omission was highlighted in the Cass Report but still it is not a topic of concern for government or advocacy groups. The absence of follow up studies seems based on the assumption that they are not needed. If one has a ‘problem’, for example if biological sex and gender don’t align and if that ‘problem’ is fixed then there is no need to follow up. That appears to be the attitude of transgender care advocates. If that assumption is questioned the person who questions it becomes ‘transphobic’ and that can result in attacks on social media and professional damage. It is easier to say nothing, to avoid becoming involved or simply leave the whole area of transgender care to adgendaists, the pharmaceutical industry and weak government.
A question that is never asked but yet should be central in charting a way forward with transgender care is whether this is a medical issue or a social phenomenon. Central to the transgender issue is whether biological sex and gender are different and disconnected. The theory is that sometimes they align and sometimes they do not. Gender is a choice based on how you feel and that is how you should be defined, biological sex is different and must be modified if possible to fit in with your gender, your real self. That is the theory. This means that your ‘feelings’ should be accepted and not challenged according to transgender activists. This is called affirmative care, the child’s belief is taken at face value, as fact. Yet in all other medical conditions based on ‘feelings’ your belief would be challenged. No physician would agree with a depressed person who wants to end his life that that choice would be best without challenging that belief. The same would apply to the anorexic person who believes that they should loose weight. Again such a belief would be challenged. Yet a belief that one is born in a wrong body and that irreversible life changing surgery is necessary is not challenged. In fact to do so is hateful. This is the total perversion of medical care as I understand such care to be.
Social phenomena come and go and were traditionally associated with the type of clothes your wore and the music you listened to. The ‘mods and rockers’ have had their day as have the ‘goths and punks’. Now the glue is social media, not clothes or music. Children that are marginalised for whatever reason are easy prey for transgender influencers. This particularly applies to children who are in the autistic spectrum. An academic article published in Nature Communications by Warrior et al in August 2020 showed higher rates of autism and psychiatric conditions in children who identify as transgender. The autism rate amongst children who identify as transgender is between three and six times higher than in the normal population depending on which academic article you read.
It is essential to challenge the belief as one would do with any other situation that has life changing consequences. The same standards should apply in transgender care as applies everywhere else. Lobbyists should have no place in clinical decision making. Reject transgender ideology and support young people by offering real help and support that will get them over a difficult period in their lives.
What is remarkable about transgender care is the total absence of quality long term follow up studies. This glaring omission was highlighted in the Cass Report but still it is not a topic of concern for government or advocacy groups. The absence of follow up studies seems based on the assumption that they are not needed. If one has a ‘problem’, for example if biological sex and gender don’t align and if that ‘problem’ is fixed then there is no need to follow up. That appears to be the attitude of transgender care advocates. If that assumption is questioned the person who questions it becomes ‘transphobic’ and that can result in attacks on social media and professional damage. It is easier to say nothing, to avoid becoming involved or simply leave the whole area of transgender care to adgendaists, the pharmaceutical industry and weak government.
A question that is never asked but yet should be central in charting a way forward with transgender care is whether this is a medical issue or a social phenomenon. Central to the transgender issue is whether biological sex and gender are different and disconnected. The theory is that sometimes they align and sometimes they do not. Gender is a choice based on how you feel and that is how you should be defined, biological sex is different and must be modified if possible to fit in with your gender, your real self. That is the theory. This means that your ‘feelings’ should be accepted and not challenged according to transgender activists. This is called affirmative care, the child’s belief is taken at face value, as fact. Yet in all other medical conditions based on ‘feelings’ your belief would be challenged. No physician would agree with a depressed person who wants to end his life that that choice would be best without challenging that belief. The same would apply to the anorexic person who believes that they should loose weight. Again such a belief would be challenged. Yet a belief that one is born in a wrong body and that irreversible life changing surgery is necessary is not challenged. In fact to do so is hateful. This is the total perversion of medical care as I understand such care to be.
Social phenomena come and go and were traditionally associated with the type of clothes your wore and the music you listened to. The ‘mods and rockers’ have had their day as have the ‘goths and punks’. Now the glue is social media, not clothes or music. Children that are marginalised for whatever reason are easy prey for transgender influencers. This particularly applies to children who are in the autistic spectrum. An academic article published in Nature Communications by Warrior et al in August 2020 showed higher rates of autism and psychiatric conditions in children who identify as transgender. The autism rate amongst children who identify as transgender is between three and six times higher than in the normal population depending on which academic article you read.
It is essential to challenge the belief as one would do with any other situation that has life changing consequences. The same standards should apply in transgender care as applies everywhere else. Lobbyists should have no place in clinical decision making. Reject transgender ideology and support young people by offering real help and support that will get them over a difficult period in their lives.
Log in to unlock more functionality.