Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
View
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
View
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
View
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
View
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
View
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
View
Christian Apologetics avatar

Christian Apologetics

Channel about Christian Apologetics and posts related to that.
Join the chat group @lwchristianchat
Contact: @AnbuOpS
Note: We never dm any of our followers, if you get any msgs from accounts which are similar to the channel, please report and block them
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verified
Trust
Not trusted
Location
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateMay 22, 2019
Added to TGlist
Jun 03, 2024
I own this channel
History of changes
Linked chat
Living Water Christian Chat
Living Water Christian Chat
274
More details

Records

22.04.202523:59
4.9KSubscribers
01.06.202423:59
0Citation index
21.05.202412:04
573Average views per post
19.02.202505:06
539Average views per ad post
18.01.202523:59
13.37%ER
25.02.202505:05
11.43%ERR

Growth

More details
Subscribers
Citation index
Avg views per post
Avg views per ad post
ER
ERR
JUL '24OCT '24JAN '25APR '25
More details

Popular posts Christian Apologetics

All posts
10.04.202516:23
“God’s creation of woman from man’s own flesh indicates their essential similarity and equal status before God. Unlike the animals, she is his counterpart.

Why, then, does God call her the man’s “helper”? Because the man cannot fulfill his purpose alone. He lacks. He needs her. Humans are made for community. The rest of the Old Testament will use the same word “helper” (ʿezer in Hebrew) in two main ways: (1) to refer to allied soldiers who assist in battle (see, for example, Joshua 1: 14; 1 Chronicles 12: 1-22), and (2) to refer to God as Israel’s helper (see, for example, Genesis 49: 25; 2 Chronicles 32: 8; Psalm 10: 14; Isaiah 41: 10-14). Clearly, in those passages, the “helper” does not have a subservient role. If anything, it is the opposite. God supplies what Israel lacks. In fact, the word ʿezer occurs as a common noun over ninety times in the Old Testament but never refers to what servants or subordinates do for their masters. ʿEzer is primarily used in military contexts and is best translated “ally.” The first man, placed in the garden and given a task and a command, needed an ally to help him fulfill these directives—someone more like him than the animals. God made woman to fill this role. Why would we read subservience into Genesis 2: 18? Perhaps we rush ahead to the disastrous consequences of human rebellion in Genesis 3, supposing that those consequences illustrate God’s intended design. But God didn’t desire thorns, thistles, and domination of the woman any more than expectant parents carefully design a time-out corner for their children before they are born. Before Adam and Eve rebel against God, no hierarchy separates them. 23 Both male and female are God’s image (Genesis 1: 27). Neither one rules the other. God’s plan is for us to work as partners. Both are to rule creation. Both sexes are required to produce offspring (Genesis 1: 28). 24”

— Being God's Image: Why Creation Still Matters by Carmen Joy Imes
19.04.202523:52
http://veritasdomain.wordpress.com/2025/03/12/free-bahnsens-lectures-the-philosophy-of-christianity/
Reposted from:
Answering Islam avatar
Answering Islam
02.04.202522:48
GodLogic Takes on Ali Dawah in a Debate On Is Jesus A Muslim?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVUGZdMMTdw
Reposted from:
Catholicism and Orthodoxy avatar
Catholicism and Orthodoxy
03.04.202516:41
How to Engage Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic Critics w/ Gavin Ortlund and Adriel Sanchez

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gn75IfXFxbo
01.04.202523:41
Paul and the Imperial Cults in Pisidian Antioch

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4qJAsfU-PE
21.04.202515:42
3 Things Every Good Muslim Should Ask a Christian

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG0Ta2K-WI8
03.04.202521:17
The History of the Vulgate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EF98_HnYHjQ
05.04.202509:08
“First, everyone has presuppositions—basic beliefs that we take for granted before we begin to draw conclusions about the universe. These include things like laws of logic and the reliability of our senses. All of our presuppositions taken together form our worldview. Our worldview determines how we interpret the facts, and even what constitutes a "fact." Most people are not aware that they have a worldview, and consequently have not given much thought to it. Second, the presuppositions of the unbeliever do not comport; they don't "go well together." They are inconsistent, often self-refuting, and would make knowledge impossible. The unbeliever's worldview cannot account for the preconditions of intelligibility—those things that are required in order for us to know anything. Preconditions of intelligibility include things like laws of logic, uniformity of nature, and absolute morality. Without a rational basis for the preconditions of intelligibility, the unbeliever cannot really know anything by his own worldview. He can certainly believe things, but he has no way to prove them, and thus he doesn't actually know them, based on his own worldview. Third, unbelievers cannot consistently act upon their own professed worldview. If they did, they couldn't know anything; they wouldn't be able to function at all. Their own presuppositions cannot make sense of the universe. Therefore, unbelievers will compulsively "steal" Christian presuppositions in order to function. They are "presuppositional kleptomaniacs," constantly assuming things (like laws of logic) that make no sense upon their professed unbiblical worldview. The fact that unbelievers consistently fail to embrace their own presuppositions shows that in their heart of hearts, they really do know the biblical God. Fourth, to expose the inconsistency in unbelieving thought, we should use the "don't answer, answer" strategy. That is, we never embrace the presuppositions of the unbeliever; otherwise, we, too, will draw the wrong conclusions about the evidence and will be reduced to foolishness. However, we do show for the sake of argument where the non-biblical assumptions of the unbeliever would lead if they were true. We show that the unbeliever cannot make sense of anything as judged by his own standards. We are exposing the fact that the unbeliever does know the biblical God but has suppressed that truth in unrighteousness (Rom. 1: 18). We expose the foolishness of the unbeliever with an attitude of reverence and humility, remembering that the unbeliever is also made in the image of God (Gen. 1: 26–27), and is to be treated with respect.”

— The Ultimate Proof of Creation by Jason Lisle
Reposted from:
Answering Islam avatar
Answering Islam
19.04.202513:33
Does This Crucifixion Contradiction DESTROY Christianity?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xt0_2fgMQSo
08.04.202500:56
The KEY Point in the Alex O'Connor vs. David Wood Debate (The Divine Council in John 10)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJb_kw_FwgE
Reposted from:
Catholicism and Orthodoxy avatar
Catholicism and Orthodoxy
10.04.202515:33
Evangelicals, We Must Learn From This

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8mLFnEXmjk
Reposted from:
Catholicism and Orthodoxy avatar
Catholicism and Orthodoxy
06.04.202517:17
How can Protestants know the canon of Scripture?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSQfeS1pvvg&pp=0gcJCX4JAYcqIYzv
05.04.202509:29
“Worldviews are a bit like kidneys. Everyone has them—you can't live or function without them. Yet, most people are unaware of their own . . . until something goes wrong with them. To force the unbeliever to think through his worldview, we want to give him the intellectual equivalent of a kidney stone (for his own benefit!). We remind him of information that he already knows to be true but which he has not carefully considered—information that his worldview cannot process. Like a kidney stone, this procedure may be very painful for the evolutionist; he's not going to be happy about it. But his erroneous worldview must be exposed for the folly it is if he is ever going to come to the knowledge of the truth. An internal critique is therefore necessary so that the unbeliever cannot "be wise in his own eyes" (Prov. 26: 5; NKJV).”

— The Ultimate Proof of Creation by Jason Lisle
05.04.202516:12
Watch THIS Before You Watch Another Dan McClellan Video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyQaVp38_lA
07.04.202502:39
Mohammad Hijab FAILS to Refute Wes Huff on the Islamic Dilemma

https://youtu.be/0JELekAX1no?si=I5ATYeBGpdNKBW5c
Log in to unlock more functionality.