Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
View
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
View
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
View
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
View
Труха⚡️Україна
Труха⚡️Україна
View
Николаевский Ванёк
Николаевский Ванёк
View
NH

NS Heathenry Exposed

Channel that deals with debunking the arguments of the telegram channel called "NS Heathenry"
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verified
Trust
Not trusted
Location
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateFeb 06, 2025
Added to TGlist
Mar 06, 2025
I own this channel
History of changes
Linked chat
NS Heathenry Exposed chat
NS Heathenry Exposed chat
67

Records

11.04.202523:59
552Subscribers
02.03.202502:38
67Citation index
10.04.202518:14
583Average views per post
03.04.202523:59
408Average views per ad post
08.03.202523:59
26.09%ER
28.02.202519:42
218.64%ERR

Growth

More details
Subscribers
Citation index
Avg views per post
Avg views per ad post
ER
ERR
БЕР '25БЕР '25БЕР '25БЕР '25КВІТ '25КВІТ '25КВІТ '25
More details

Popular posts NS Heathenry Exposed

All posts
Reposted from:
ϟϟ-Nomaden avatar
ϟϟ-Nomaden
24.03.202517:44
When "Christian Nazis" are promoting their ideology, both Christians AND National Socialists should actively work to:

1. Expose historical facts. Show how the NSDAP persecuted clergy and replaced Christian symbols with pagan or state-controlled alternatives.

2. Debunk logical inconsistencies. Show how NS ideology is fundamentally about race, whereas Christianity is about faith, making them fundamentally incompatible.

3. Use their own sources against them. If they claim Hitler was a Christian, share quotes like this: "Christianity is a rebellion against natural law, a protest against nature. Taken to its logical extreme, Christianity would mean the systematic cultivation of the human failure."

4. Expose their manipulation. Ask them why, if the NS Germans were truly Christian, they persecuted clergymen, removed crosses, rewrote the Bible to remove Jewish influences, and arrested Christian leaders.

5. Call out manipulation by the Germans. Point out that Hitler and the German leadership used Christianity as a political tool, because they had to, while actively working to replace it. Mention how they persecuted faithful Christians who resisted their ideology.
08.04.202523:04
SS — Pagan Graves?

No. We need to understand Himmler to understand the context of the graves and the pre-Christian [although not many] elements of the SS.

— Hans Schmidt, SS Panzergrenadier, p. 43:

“Within a little more than two years after being appointed as the Reichsfuhrer or national commander of the SS, Heinrich Himmler had managed to enlarge his organization to about 30,000 men. No mean feat for anybody. He also imbued his order with a mythology combining Germanic (pre-Christian) rites, a strict adherence to racial laws and unquestioned fealty to Adolf Hitler.” [1]

Read 'SS Defender Against Bolshevism' to understand the context of the graves and the other ancient traditions. They considered the graves to be ancient Germanic graves, they didn't see them as pagan. NS Heathenry seems to don't understand this basic concept.

Here's another example of this, in SS Defender Against Bolshevism, Germanic Law:

“Ancient Germanic law prevented any unauthorized individual from destroying anything in nature that is holy for all men and created by God. Until relatively recent times it was forbidden in Germanic settlements to cut down a tree within the village without the agreement of the other peasants. If a tree was cut down, this was tied to the obligation to plant three new young trees.” [2]

Heathen/pagan law Ancient Germanic Law. Also read the 'Faith in God' chapter:

The answer is: “We swear to you, Adolf Hitler, as führer and chancellor of the German Reich, loyalty and courage. We promise you and the superiors designated by you obedience unto death. So help us GOD!”
The second question is: “So you believe in a God?”
The answer is: “Yes, I believe in a God!”
The third question is: “What do you think of a person who does not
believe in God?”
The answer is: “I consider him arrogant, megalomaniac and dumb. He is not suited for us.”
I have informed you of these three questions and answers in order to clearly present our stand on religion. Be assured that we would not be able to form such an ironclad corps, if we did not have conviction and faith in a God who stands over us, who has created us, our fatherland, our folk and the earth, and who has sent us our Führer. We are piously convinced that in accordance with the eternal laws of this earth we must stand by every deed, every word and every thought. Everything that our mind thinks up, our tongue speaks and our hand carries out does not stop with its execution, rather it is a cause that will have an effect, an inescapable course that will return to us and our folk as a blessing or as a curse. Believe me, people with this stance are anything but atheists. We refuse to allow ourselves to be slandered as atheists - through misuse of the term PAGAN - simply because we as a community do not embrace a particular denomination or dogma or demand this from any of our men. We allow ourselves the right and the freedom to draw a sharp and distinct line between religious/church/denominational activity and political/world-view soldiery, and we will fiercely combat any violation. Likewise, we teach our men - despite much justified outrage and many bad experiences that our folk has had in this area in the past - to respect everything that is holy to any folk comrade - due to his education and conviction - without any insult in word or deed. [Ibid]


They recognized these graves as ancient traditions of their people, not as pagan graves. It was entirely under a different context. And also: the SS refused to the idea that they were atheist, and view the term "pagan" as an insult. Drawing a sharp and distinct line between religious/church/denominational activity and political/world-view soldiery

You can still find Christians celebrating their nations ancient traditions (not worship of old deities), practically all over Europe. This doesn't make them heathens or anti-Christians.

Source:
[1] Hans Schmidt, SS Panzergrenadier, p. 43
[2] SS Defender Against Bolshevism, pp. 7, 19.
10.04.202522:16
The Reichsführer-ᛋᛋ Personal Staff
Berlin, January 31, 1940

Attached, I am sending, on behalf of the Reichsführer-ᛋᛋ, a Bible dating from the 13th century, which was secured during the occupation of the Catholic seminary in Płock.

The Reichsführer-ᛋᛋ requests that this Bible be restored as necessary since he intends to keep it in the library of Monestary Wewelsburg. Please inform me when the Bible is finished and available for dispatch. On behalf of

ᛋᛋ-Hauptsturmführer
AgAD3BkAAvqbwFM
779 kB
Post media background
Post media
28.03.202511:48
The NSDAP's four-point plan to curb Evola's influence in Germany

A 1937 investigation by the SS into Baron Evola concluded the following:

"There exist no grounds for National Socialism to place itself at the disposal of Baron Evola. His political plans for a Romano-Germanic Imperium are of a utopian character and moreover very apt to cause ideological confusions. Since Evola is also only tolerated and barely supported by Fascism, it is tactically not necessary to accommodate his tendencies from our side. It is therefore recommended to:

1. NOT SUPPORT EVOLA'S CURRENT EFFORTS for the establishment of a secret supra-national order and the founding of a magazine directed toward this goal.

2. CURB HIS PUBLIC ACTIVITIES in
Germany after this lecture series, without taking any
special measures.

3. PREVENT HIS FURTHER PENETRATION into leading offices of the party and the state.

4. OBSERVE HIS PROPAGANDA ACTIVITY in neighboring countries.

In a short letter (AR/83) dated August 8, 1938, it then says laconically: "The Reichsfuhrer-SS has acknowledged the report regarding the lectures of Baron Evola and is in full agreement with the thoughts and recommendations stated in the last paragraph thereof."

Citations:
1. Personal staff of the Reichsführer-SS (file AR/126)
2. Personal staff of the Reichsführer-SS (AR/83)
3. Men Among the Ruins by Julius Evola, pp.63-64
06.04.202521:39
Post media background
Post media
25.03.202523:07
"The cross of Christ and the Hooked Cross do not need to oppose each other, and must not do so, but rather they can and should stand together. One should not dominate the other, but rather each should maintain its own meaning and significance. The cross of Christ points toward heaven and admonishes us: Remember that you are Christian people, carried by the eternal love of the heavenly father, free through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, sanctified by the power of God’s spirit."

— Gerhard Hahn

Source: Christuskreuz und Hakenkreuz, Schriftenreihe der “Deutschen Christen” Hannovers, Nr. 1 (1934).
Post media background
Post media
10.04.202505:33
Reinhard Heydrich was a devout Catholic

"In 1936 he (Reinhard Heydrich)
surprised me by confessing that he had left the Church. And at that moment I also confessed my sin to him. However, he left the Church for a completely different reason than I did. Despite our evangelical wedding, he remained a Catholic.
In his official or work activities, he encountered political Catholicism."

Lina Heidrich
Leben mit einem Kriegsverbrecher
pp 57-58
Post media background
Post media
28.03.202521:48
Source: Otto Skorzeny, La Guerre Inconnue p.330
30.03.202521:22
The "Ns Heathenry" channel has once again cited sources without apparently reading or understanding their content. Regarding the "Mein Kampf" chapter, we have already provided a thorough refutation and explanation of its meaning. [1] [2]

As for the "Table Talks", you have once again relied on an unreliable source and misrepresented Mikael Nilsson’s book to make it appear as though they are credible. Now, let’s expose the truth you are trying to conceal.

When Mikael Nilsson says that Table Talks could only be used if confirmed by other independent sources, he did not mean using similar quotes always from the same source, i.e., Table Talks itself, to confirm their reliability. Nilsson meant that it is necessary to use external and independent sources that confirm the quotes from Table Talks.

Furthermore, what you have shown is a clear example of a probable manipulation of the notes by Martin Bormann. In fact, in a speech at the Platterhof to generals and officers on May 26, 1944, Hitler addresses the theme of violence in Christianity but first states that he "DOES NOT DEFEND AN ANTI-CHRISTIAN PRINCIPLE." [3]

This means that when Hitler refers to violence in Christianity, he is not being critical in any way and cannot be interpreted as such.

Furthermore, Nilsson demonstrated that these Table Talks cannot be considered as Hitler's actual words and that, moreover, the notes from these conversations were edited by Bormann himself:

The idea that the Table Talks contain Hitler's words
 as they were actually spoken to his entourage in the various military HQs during the war must, as a result, be considered to have been conclusively disproven. The table talks are not that kind of sources, since they, contrary to what has been assumed by prior research, were not the product of stenographic notes. Instead, they were re-constructed entirely from memory, and sometimes partly from so-called supporting words. Heim's proof pages show that they were not only edited later on – text was added, taken out, or moved around – and sometimes finished long after the date on them. [...]
This means that they are not Hitler's words and that they cannot, and should not, be quoted as such. [4]
So, in conclusion, when Hitler refers to the relationship between violence and Christianity, he is not making a critique of it. The only instance where this appears to happen is in the "Table Talks", but as demonstrated, these are unreliable and contradict other sources that can be considered reliable.

SOURCE:
[1] Hitler Mein Kampf 1
[2] Hitler Mein Kampf 2
[3] Hitler's Speech 26 May 1944
[4] Hitler Redux Page 384
Reposted from:
NS Heathenry avatar
NS Heathenry
10.04.202522:12
Purium

"The BIBLE gives us one of the historical examples of the radical annihilation of an Aryan folk by Bolshevik-Jewish methods. Read this a part of Jewish history where it is written that the Jews were distributed among the Persians, in all cities and villages and in the capitol Sufa. The Aryan Persians recognized the danger posed by these Jews. The will to solve the Jewish question in Persia was personified by Minister Haman. The king, who the Bible calls Ahasveros but who was really Xeres, was separated from his Persian wife Basthi by the extremely clever intrigue of the court Jews. The king was influenced by Jewish girls, especially by the Jewish harlot Esther."

— SS defender against Bolshevism by Heinrich Himmler

@NSHeathenry
29.03.202523:37
—On this point it is fundamental to state: in every age and among all peoples there were upheavals in the religious field;
one will not want to deny the right of our time to be allowed to seek a belief in God that is in our nature." - page 24
"
The claim that many lodges are Christian is also a deception. Proof: Wherever the Masons have gained political power, they have acted violently against Christianity. [...] so with the Freemasons Lenin, Trotsky and Stalin in Russia." - page 102
Léon Degrelle, our previous source, was also mentioned in these leaflets - quoted and praised.

Himmler's theology may be a bit flawed (primarily regarding the OT), but he is clearly FAR from any sort of "heathenry" at this point.

In the leaflets we see NO MENTION of "Waralda/Wralda" or any similar nonsense.

Himmler also advocated for releasing Christian clergy "in one case or another", who were interned mostly for their work against the state, as shown by a document from 1945.

Apart from these writings, we also have physical examples one can see even today - the amount of Christian art kept in the Wewelsburg monastery:

"Photographs taken at Himmler's Wewelsburg SS Monastery by Damian Entwistle, decor found in Himmler's main rooms;

- Statue of Martin Luther
- Statue of St. Anthony of Padua
- Two statues of the Virgin Mary and the Child
- Large crucifix removed from Himmlers bedroom
- Large bust of Saint Augustine

A Holy Lance was also discovered on Himmler’s desk; it was found broken. Later, it was restored to its original form."

If Himmler really commited to this idea of "replacing" Christianity, wouldn't he have atleast started with his own castle?

Conclusion: Himmler apostasized from Christianity, but through the help of Léon Degrelle (and perhaps others which we do not know of — for example Himmler's cousin, a high ranking SS man and Catholic theologian) he was brought back to the faith.

NOTE: Not a SINGLE source on this post is derived from the site "Mourning the Ancient", due to it's questionable imagery and lack of audio recorded interviews. This is not to say that the interviews there are falsificates, but all the sources used here are independent and can be backed up.

I also decided to avoid using any images of Himmler at churches/cathedrals, since this can also be written off as merely "political" in nature.

God bless!
10.04.202522:16
FAIL

This quote is not a direct attack on Christianity or the Bible. Rather, Himmler references a biblical episod —the story of Esther—to construct a narrative about the so-called Jewish threat, in line with typical National Socialist ideology. The Bible is used as a historical source to support the idea that Jews have conspired against “Aryan” peoples since ancient times, in this case, the Persians. The intent is not to criticize the Christian religion, but to use a religious text to illustrate the Nationalsocialist vision of the “Jewish threat.” For this reason, reading the quote as an anti-Christian statement is misleading; therefore your interpretation represents a fundamental misreading of the quotation and a desperate attempt to twist his words.

Furthermore, it is known that Himmler had a particular fascination with the Bible, to the extent that he ordered the restoration of a 13th-century Bible to be kept at Wewelsburg Castle. [1]

In conclusion, with this post that you believed supported your argument, you have in fact demonstrated the opposite—showing how the Bible was actually central to Himmler’s life, as evidenced by his extensive knowledge of it and his inclusion of a biblical story in one of his most important theoretical writings.

SOURCE:
[1] NS 19/601
24.03.202517:49
A group of pagans seems to continue to spread this to prove that the NSDAP was pagan, so let's refute this bullshit point by point:

1- The hooked cross is a Christian symbol and is a political representation of what Christianity wants and should want [1]. Moreover, the hooked cross and the cross of Christ did not oppose each other:

The cross of Christ and the Hooked Cross do not need to oppose each other, and must not do so, but rather they can and should stand together
. One should not dominate the other, but rather each should maintain its own meaning and significance. The cross of Christ points toward heaven and admonishes us: Remember that you are Christian people, carried by the eternal love of the heavenly father, free through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, sanctified by the power of God’s spirit. The Hooked Cross, however, points to the world as a divine creation and admonishes us: Remember that you are German, born in German territory to parents of German blood, filled with the German spirit and essence, formed according to German nature. Both together, however, the cross of Christ and the swastika, admonish us: Remember that you are German Christian people and should become ever more whole German Christian people, and remain so! [2]

2- In fact, the Bible addresses the issue of race multiple times, stating that racial mixing is forbidden (Genesis 1:24; Deuteronomy 23:2-3; Deuteronomy 7:3; Jude 1:7; Daniel 2:43; Micah 5:7; Joel 1:4; Ezra 9:2; Numbers 25:6-17; Malachi 1:2-3), and emphasizing the importance of race even after Christ (1 Peter 2:9; Romans 9:3). However, some pagans might respond by citing Galatians 3:28. Galatians 3:28 is by far one of the most misquoted and misinterpreted sections of the New Testament in regards to Theology. Superficially, this verse appears to be pushing for racial egalitarianism, and denies the material reality of race and racial hierarchy in the world, but this interpretation is nothing more than a Gnostic heresy. Contrary to the conventional understanding of this verse, the actual dogmatic commentaries on Galatians preach the exact opposite message, being that Race as a material reality will forever remain engrained into the character of an individual regardless if they adhere to Christianity or not:
St. Augustine explains perfectly that this verse does not diminish the carnal racial and genetic conditions of the different races.

Difference of race
 or condition or sex is indeed taken away by the unity of faith, but it remains embedded in our mortal interactions, and in the journey of this life the apostles themselves teach that it is to be respected, and they even proposed living in accord with the racial differences between Jews and Greeks as a wholesome rule. For we observe in the unity of faith that there are no such distinctions. Yet within the orders of this life they persist. [3]

As can be seen here, St Augustine affirms that as Christians we are united by our faith and thus our souls are equal in the eyes of God, however he dispels the notion that racial distinctions do not exist and points out that these distinctions are to be respected and treated as a "wholesome rule". It is clear then, that Paul is not denying the existence of racial distinctions, and as the Church Fathers have pointed out, despite our unity in faith, we are still distinct from each other racially in accordance with the races that God fashioned (Acts 17:26), clearly disproving attempts made to show that this verse illustrates the irrelevance of race.
Post media background
Post media
27.03.202522:31
"the Fuhrer, educated in Catholicism, never renounced this religion."

Source: Otto Skorzeny, La Guerre Inconnue p.330

@NsHeathenryExposed
26.03.202516:18
VON SCHIRACH: No. A comparison between Hitler and God has never been made by me; and I see BLASPHEMY in it, and I have always seen blasphemy in such a comparison.

It is true that in the long years in which I believed in Hitler I saw in him a leader of the people sent by God. [525] I believe that one can address every great man in history - and I used to see Hitler as such - as one sent by God."

Source: Geschichte, Der Nürnberger Prozeß, Einhundertachtunddreißigster Tag. Freitag, 24. Mai 1946, p. 523-525
Log in to unlock more functionality.