Elon Musk Relay
Reposted from:
America Uncovered
23.02.202519:10
Guess Who LOVES Trump’s Response to Ukraine
Duration: 00:14:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-hLZn0doKY
Duration: 00:14:06
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-hLZn0doKY
Reposted from:
NewsShare
23.02.202518:41
An American Airlines flight made a safe landing in Rome after a mid-air bomb threat prompted an emergency diversion.
Italian Air Force Eurofighters were seen escorting the Boeing aircraft as it touched down under the protection of Italian fighter jets.
A heavy security presence has now been established at Rome's airport, where the plane will undergo a thorough inspection.
Italian Air Force Eurofighters were seen escorting the Boeing aircraft as it touched down under the protection of Italian fighter jets.
A heavy security presence has now been established at Rome's airport, where the plane will undergo a thorough inspection.
Reposted from:
Russell Brand
23.02.202516:47
Why don't you just say China's a sh*thole while you're at it?
Reposted from:
FuxNews
22.02.202522:32
Elon Musk makes stunning discovery in social security database
Duration: 00:12:03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkklLJcwjxE
Duration: 00:12:03
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkklLJcwjxE
Reposted from:
The Storm
22.02.202506:56
😁 BREAKING: Pam Bondi just declared that restrictions shielding administrative law judges from removal are unconstitutional and will no longer defend them in court.
Pam Bondi, as U.S. Attorney General, has indeed taken a stance against the removal restrictions for administrative law judges (ALJs). On February 20, 2025, the U.S. Justice Department, under her leadership, announced that it considers the multiple layers of protection shielding ALJs from presidential removal to be unconstitutional. This shift in policy means the DOJ will no longer defend these restrictions in court, aligning with a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce the power of federal regulatory agencies. This was reported by Reuters and corroborated by posts on X reflecting current sentiment.
This move builds on prior legal groundwork. You mentioned last year’s Supreme Court ruling, which likely refers to the June 27, 2024, decision in SEC v. Cochran. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s use of in-house administrative law judges to adjudicate enforcement actions violated the Constitution, specifically the Appointments Clause and the right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment. This decision weakened the legal foundation for ALJs operating independently within agencies, supporting the argument that such judges should be subject to greater executive control.
The implication here is that, with the DOJ’s new position, President Trump could potentially remove ALJs more easily, targeting those perceived as obstructing his agenda—though the claim of them "secretly perverting the Constitution" is an opinion not directly substantiated by legal documents. The "deep-state judges" losing "all their legal support" is also a rhetorical flourish rather than a precise legal outcome, but it reflects a narrative of dismantling bureaucratic resistance, consistent with sentiments expressed in various X posts and conservative commentary.
This development doesn’t immediately strip all ALJs of their roles—it opens the door to legal challenges and executive actions that could reshape how these judges function across agencies like the Social Security Administration, the National Labor Relations Board, and others. However, any mass removal would still face practical and legal hurdles, including court battles and the need to redefine adjudication processes. The broader impact remains uncertain and will likely unfold through future litigation and policy changes.
Pam Bondi, as U.S. Attorney General, has indeed taken a stance against the removal restrictions for administrative law judges (ALJs). On February 20, 2025, the U.S. Justice Department, under her leadership, announced that it considers the multiple layers of protection shielding ALJs from presidential removal to be unconstitutional. This shift in policy means the DOJ will no longer defend these restrictions in court, aligning with a broader effort by the Trump administration to reduce the power of federal regulatory agencies. This was reported by Reuters and corroborated by posts on X reflecting current sentiment.
This move builds on prior legal groundwork. You mentioned last year’s Supreme Court ruling, which likely refers to the June 27, 2024, decision in SEC v. Cochran. In that case, the Supreme Court ruled that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s use of in-house administrative law judges to adjudicate enforcement actions violated the Constitution, specifically the Appointments Clause and the right to a jury trial under the Seventh Amendment. This decision weakened the legal foundation for ALJs operating independently within agencies, supporting the argument that such judges should be subject to greater executive control.
The implication here is that, with the DOJ’s new position, President Trump could potentially remove ALJs more easily, targeting those perceived as obstructing his agenda—though the claim of them "secretly perverting the Constitution" is an opinion not directly substantiated by legal documents. The "deep-state judges" losing "all their legal support" is also a rhetorical flourish rather than a precise legal outcome, but it reflects a narrative of dismantling bureaucratic resistance, consistent with sentiments expressed in various X posts and conservative commentary.
This development doesn’t immediately strip all ALJs of their roles—it opens the door to legal challenges and executive actions that could reshape how these judges function across agencies like the Social Security Administration, the National Labor Relations Board, and others. However, any mass removal would still face practical and legal hurdles, including court battles and the need to redefine adjudication processes. The broader impact remains uncertain and will likely unfold through future litigation and policy changes.
Reposted from:
Pedo Pete
22.02.202504:41
"Why’s Eric Swalwell yelling so loud about Kash Patel?
Because the only thing barking louder than his speeches is his conscience after that Fang Fang fiasco!"
This is Eric Swalwell unfiltered—part prosecutor, part preacher—sounding the alarm on Patel’s FBI gig like it’s the final straw in Trump’s authoritarian playbook. It’s vintage Swalwell: loud, combative, and leaning hard into his base’s anxieties.
He’s right that the Senate’s 51-49 vote shows GOP lockstep with Trump, but his apocalyptic leaps—mass arrests, a dissolved Congress—feel more like red meat for his X followers than a measured take.
The real juice is in his fight-back plan: courts, states, budget hardball. It’s scrappy and doable, especially from a California perch. But Swalwell’s not just rallying—he’s warning that if Patel’s the attack dog he fears, democracy’s in the crosshairs. We’ll see if he’s crying wolf or calling the shot.
For now, he’s got his district’s ear—and he’s not letting go.
Because the only thing barking louder than his speeches is his conscience after that Fang Fang fiasco!"
This is Eric Swalwell unfiltered—part prosecutor, part preacher—sounding the alarm on Patel’s FBI gig like it’s the final straw in Trump’s authoritarian playbook. It’s vintage Swalwell: loud, combative, and leaning hard into his base’s anxieties.
He’s right that the Senate’s 51-49 vote shows GOP lockstep with Trump, but his apocalyptic leaps—mass arrests, a dissolved Congress—feel more like red meat for his X followers than a measured take.
The real juice is in his fight-back plan: courts, states, budget hardball. It’s scrappy and doable, especially from a California perch. But Swalwell’s not just rallying—he’s warning that if Patel’s the attack dog he fears, democracy’s in the crosshairs. We’ll see if he’s crying wolf or calling the shot.
For now, he’s got his district’s ear—and he’s not letting go.
Reposted from:Pedo Pete
23.02.202518:54
"Why’d the mind virus take so long to ruin the party?
It was too busy hiding in the small talk, waiting for everyone to forget it RSVP’d!"
It was too busy hiding in the small talk, waiting for everyone to forget it RSVP’d!"
23.02.202516:25
Reposted from:
TrumpRelay
22.02.202522:32
JUST IN: Border Czar Tom Homan Shares Extremely Blunt Message To Illegal Immigrants Still In U.S.
Duration: 00:14:46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwCUZfGB3_8
Duration: 00:14:46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwCUZfGB3_8
Reposted from:
X22-Report
22.02.202506:37
X22-3577-Report
The beginning 👉 03:11
Operation Whirlwind,Red Cross On Deck,Kash Is Going To Drop The Hammer,Setting The Stage – Ep. 3577
February 20, 2025
The beginning 👉 03:11
Operation Whirlwind,Red Cross On Deck,Kash Is Going To Drop The Hammer,Setting The Stage – Ep. 3577
February 20, 2025
Reposted from:
Twitter Relay
23.02.202518:45
AfD politician Björn Höcke ERUPTS:
“Germany is our country, our land, our nation. Germany is non-negotiable. Let’s take our country back!” 🇩🇪
“Germany is our country, our land, our nation. Germany is non-negotiable. Let’s take our country back!” 🇩🇪
Reposted from:TrumpRelay
22.02.202522:31
Trump delivers remarks on final day of CPAC
Duration : 1:16:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnH_na_TjnQ
Duration : 1:16:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnH_na_TjnQ
Reposted from:
Tucker Carlson on X
22.02.202506:32
Tucker Carlson Friday February 21, 2025
Ray Dalio- America’s Hidden Civil War, and the Race to Beat China in Tech, Economics, and Academia
Duration : 42:38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0j1gcGD5DrA
Ray Dalio on AI, the debt crisis and what actually makes people happy.
(0:00) The Hidden Civil War Happening in the US
(5:00) What Caused This Mass Polarization?
(8:03) Will the Advancement of Tech Destroy Us?
(15:44) Ray Dalio’s Predictions About AI
(19:09) AI’s Impact on Economics
(26:21) Should We End the Development of AI?
(28:19) China vs. the US In the Race for AI Advancement
(32:00) Are We Seeing the End of Academia?
(35:54) How Advanced Tech Will Impact Harmony, Happiness, and God
Includes paid partnerships.
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1893045548459954510
Ray Dalio- America’s Hidden Civil War, and the Race to Beat China in Tech, Economics, and Academia
Duration : 42:38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0j1gcGD5DrA
Ray Dalio on AI, the debt crisis and what actually makes people happy.
(0:00) The Hidden Civil War Happening in the US
(5:00) What Caused This Mass Polarization?
(8:03) Will the Advancement of Tech Destroy Us?
(15:44) Ray Dalio’s Predictions About AI
(19:09) AI’s Impact on Economics
(26:21) Should We End the Development of AI?
(28:19) China vs. the US In the Race for AI Advancement
(32:00) Are We Seeing the End of Academia?
(35:54) How Advanced Tech Will Impact Harmony, Happiness, and God
Includes paid partnerships.
https://x.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1893045548459954510
Reposted from:Twitter Relay
23.02.202518:43
"Germany’s election just proved it: the silent majority’s fed up with woke experiments and open borders. CDU’s back in charge, AfD’s roaring, and the left’s licking its wounds. Time to put common sense over ideology—who’s with me?"
Reposted from:The Storm
23.02.202518:25
The German election results have indeed sparked a wave of reactions, reflecting the seismic shift in the country's political landscape as of February 23, 2025.
The center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), led by Friedrich Merz, has clinched a victory, positioning Merz as the likely next chancellor. This outcome marks a significant turnaround after the collapse of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s “traffic light” coalition—comprising the Social Democratic Party (SPD), Greens, and Free Democratic Party (FDP)—late last year. Carsten Linnemann, CDU General Secretary, didn’t mince words, celebrating the end of the coalition’s tenure and confidently declaring Merz as the incoming chancellor. It’s a clear signal that the CDU sees this as a mandate to steer Germany in a new direction, likely with a sharper focus on economic recovery and tighter migration policies, which dominated the campaign.
Meanwhile, the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) has achieved a historic second-place finish, nearly doubling its 2021 performance. Alice Weidel, the AfD’s chancellor candidate, wasted no time extending an offer to collaborate with the CDU, saying, “Our hand remains outstretched.” This gesture, while bold, seems more symbolic than practical—Merz has consistently ruled out any coalition with the AfD, a stance rooted in Germany’s postwar political taboo against partnering with the far right. Still, the AfD’s surge sends shockwaves, underscoring a growing appetite among voters for its hardline anti-immigration stance, especially after recent high-profile attacks linked to migrants.
On the flip side, the SPD’s collapse is stark—its worst showing in over a century under its current name, landing at around 16% per exit polls. Matthias Miersch’s somber “very bitter evening” sums up the mood: the party that topped the 2021 vote has been relegated to third place, a humbling fall for Scholz’s leadership. The Greens and FDP didn’t fare much better, with the former at 13.3% and the latter struggling to clear the 5% threshold for parliamentary seats. This rout of the left-leaning coalition reflects widespread frustration with economic stagnation and immigration policies that many voters felt went too far under Scholz.
Reactions beyond the party lines are telling. Angela Merkel, Merz’s predecessor and longtime CDU leader, had criticized his pre-election flirtation with AfD-backed migration measures, hinting at lingering tensions within the conservative camp. Protests against any CDU-AfD alignment have already flared up, showing that Germany’s “firewall” against the far right remains a raw nerve. For Merz, the challenge now is coalition-building—most likely with the SPD or Greens, despite ideological gaps widened by his rightward shift. The AfD, though shut out of government, looms large as a potential opposition force, promising to “hound” the mainstream parties. Germany’s next chapter looks set to be anything but dull.
The center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), led by Friedrich Merz, has clinched a victory, positioning Merz as the likely next chancellor. This outcome marks a significant turnaround after the collapse of Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s “traffic light” coalition—comprising the Social Democratic Party (SPD), Greens, and Free Democratic Party (FDP)—late last year. Carsten Linnemann, CDU General Secretary, didn’t mince words, celebrating the end of the coalition’s tenure and confidently declaring Merz as the incoming chancellor. It’s a clear signal that the CDU sees this as a mandate to steer Germany in a new direction, likely with a sharper focus on economic recovery and tighter migration policies, which dominated the campaign.
Meanwhile, the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) has achieved a historic second-place finish, nearly doubling its 2021 performance. Alice Weidel, the AfD’s chancellor candidate, wasted no time extending an offer to collaborate with the CDU, saying, “Our hand remains outstretched.” This gesture, while bold, seems more symbolic than practical—Merz has consistently ruled out any coalition with the AfD, a stance rooted in Germany’s postwar political taboo against partnering with the far right. Still, the AfD’s surge sends shockwaves, underscoring a growing appetite among voters for its hardline anti-immigration stance, especially after recent high-profile attacks linked to migrants.
On the flip side, the SPD’s collapse is stark—its worst showing in over a century under its current name, landing at around 16% per exit polls. Matthias Miersch’s somber “very bitter evening” sums up the mood: the party that topped the 2021 vote has been relegated to third place, a humbling fall for Scholz’s leadership. The Greens and FDP didn’t fare much better, with the former at 13.3% and the latter struggling to clear the 5% threshold for parliamentary seats. This rout of the left-leaning coalition reflects widespread frustration with economic stagnation and immigration policies that many voters felt went too far under Scholz.
Reactions beyond the party lines are telling. Angela Merkel, Merz’s predecessor and longtime CDU leader, had criticized his pre-election flirtation with AfD-backed migration measures, hinting at lingering tensions within the conservative camp. Protests against any CDU-AfD alignment have already flared up, showing that Germany’s “firewall” against the far right remains a raw nerve. For Merz, the challenge now is coalition-building—most likely with the SPD or Greens, despite ideological gaps widened by his rightward shift. The AfD, though shut out of government, looms large as a potential opposition force, promising to “hound” the mainstream parties. Germany’s next chapter looks set to be anything but dull.
Reposted from:
VALUETAINMENT
22.02.202522:57
FULL SPEECH: Patrick Bet-David Delivers Remarks at CPAC 2025 - 2/22/25
Duration: 00:12:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-d6N_wgp1O4
Duration: 00:12:40
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-d6N_wgp1O4
Reposted from:TrumpRelay
22.02.202522:25
Trump delivers remarks on final day of CPAC
Duration : 1:16:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnH_na_TjnQ
Duration : 1:16:55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnH_na_TjnQ
Reposted from:TrumpRelay
22.02.202505:55
Why did Trump call Janet Mills “he”?
Because he thought “governor” was just a guy who governs the lobsters!
“President Trump referred to Maine’s Governor ‘Janet Mills’ as a ‘He’ or ‘Him’ at least 6 times during a phone call…”
Trump’s misgendering isn’t just a slip—it’s a microcosm of his approach: unscripted, divisive, and amplified by today’s media echo chamber. On February 21, 2025, as he navigates his second term (per recent reports), such moments test his administration’s credibility against foes like Mills, who’s ready to legally challenge him. It’s less about the pronoun than the pattern: Rice’s history shows how such controversies can define a legacy, for better or worse.
Because he thought “governor” was just a guy who governs the lobsters!
“President Trump referred to Maine’s Governor ‘Janet Mills’ as a ‘He’ or ‘Him’ at least 6 times during a phone call…”
Trump’s misgendering isn’t just a slip—it’s a microcosm of his approach: unscripted, divisive, and amplified by today’s media echo chamber. On February 21, 2025, as he navigates his second term (per recent reports), such moments test his administration’s credibility against foes like Mills, who’s ready to legally challenge him. It’s less about the pronoun than the pattern: Rice’s history shows how such controversies can define a legacy, for better or worse.
Reposted from:Twitter Relay
22.02.202503:31
The February 21, 2025, exchange between President Trump and Governor Mills encapsulates a pivotal moment in the intersection of sports policy, federal authority, and state autonomy. Trump’s assertive stance and Mills’ legal challenge highlight a deepening divide, with significant implications for educational funding, civil rights, and the future of transgender participation in athletics. As the situation unfolds, the anticipated courtroom showdown will be a critical juncture in resolving these contentious issues.
Immediate Aftermath
Hours after the confrontation, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced a Title IX investigation into the Maine Department of Education and a specific school district (Cumberland-North Yarmouth) for permitting a transgender student to compete in girls’ sports. This swift federal response signals an intent to escalate pressure on Maine, potentially as a test case for enforcing the executive order nationwide.
Immediate Aftermath
Hours after the confrontation, the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights announced a Title IX investigation into the Maine Department of Education and a specific school district (Cumberland-North Yarmouth) for permitting a transgender student to compete in girls’ sports. This swift federal response signals an intent to escalate pressure on Maine, potentially as a test case for enforcing the executive order nationwide.
Shown 1 - 24 of 742
Log in to unlock more functionality.