«Хорошо бы узнать, чтобы не ошибиться в возможном депутатском обращении. На самом деле совсем не забавно. Ведь получается, что гражданин Текслер уже открыто считает себя "новой знатью"? <...> С подобного рода хамством со стороны "элитки", кстати говоря, и боролись Ленин со Сталиным».

«Хорошо бы узнать, чтобы не ошибиться в возможном депутатском обращении. На самом деле совсем не забавно. Ведь получается, что гражданин Текслер уже открыто считает себя "новой знатью"? <...> С подобного рода хамством со стороны "элитки", кстати говоря, и боролись Ленин со Сталиным».

The fighting has resumed. We said so from the very beginning, when we declared a truce. We always have a positive attitude towards a truce, which is why we came up with such an initiative, especially since we are talking about the bright Easter days. This is a holiday for all Christians. This is how it turned out these days for Catholics, Protestants, and Orthodox Christians.

That is why we have always spoken about this, because we have a positive attitude towards any peace initiatives. We hope that the representatives of the Kyiv regime will have the same attitude. Although we saw the initial reaction, I think that everyone noticed it, a statement was published according to which our proposal was considered as a game with destinies, with people's lives, and so on.

But there must have been someone smarter there, who suggested, most likely foreign curators, that rejecting such initiatives is a losing position for the Kyiv regime, and they quickly agreed. Now we see that the Kiev regime is trying to seize the initiative, to talk about expanding the time frame and the targets, but we must think, of course, and carefully evaluate everything, look at the results.

If you noticed, I said from the very beginning, when I met with the Chief of the General Staff, that we would see what the experience of declaring an Easter truce would be. What is he talking about? In general, we are seeing a decrease in combat activity on the part of the enemy.

This is true. These are estimates, including those of our group commanders. But, nevertheless, there were almost 5,000 violations, 4,900. Of these, 6 attacks and 90 attempts to strike aircraft-type UAVs. 1,400 artillery shellings.

But overall, there was a decrease in activity. We welcome this and are ready to look at the future. As for the proposal not to strike civilian infrastructure facilities, this needs to be sorted out. For example, everyone is well aware of the strike by our armed forces on the congress center, I think, of Sumy University.

Is it a civilian object or not? Civilian. But there was an award ceremony for those who committed crimes in the Kursk region, both units of the Ukrainian Armed Forces and nationalists. And these are the people we consider criminals who should receive deserved retribution for what they did in the border region, including in Kursk.

They got this retribution. It was done precisely to punish them. But are these civilian objects or not? But the regime uses these civilian objects. Or just recently, a few days ago, our armed forces struck in the Odessa region. This is a small settlement in the Odessa region, 82 kilometers, I think, from Odessa. So what kind of object is this?

An agricultural facility, hangars, an agricultural enterprise. But there the Kyiv authorities, together with foreign curators and assistants, tried to organize not only the production, but also the testing of a new missile system. That's where the strike was carried out. So is it a civilian facility or not? Civilian, but it was used for military purposes. Or they hold some kind of gathering in a restaurant.

Those people who deserve the most severe punishment for the crimes they committed. This also happened. In a restaurant, they hold gatherings, meetings, conferences, celebrate something, drink vodka, and so on. That was also where a strike was made. Is it a civilian facility? Civilian, but what is the target? Military. This needs to be sorted out, this is all a subject for a thorough study, maybe bilaterally, as a result of a dialogue, we do not rule this out. So we will analyze all this and make appropriate decisions for the future.

📝 "There was no reason for Putin to launch missiles into civilian areas, cities and towns over the last few days. This makes me think that maybe he doesn't want to stop the war, he's just pulling my leg and should be dealt with differently, through "banking" or "secondary sanctions"? "Too many people are dying!!!"