Covid Truth Network
This is the channel of a group of public health, science, and media experts who will clarify the truth about Covid-19 and the associated measures and therapies.
TGlist rating
0
0
TypePublic
Verification
Not verifiedTrust
Not trustedLocation
LanguageOther
Channel creation dateMar 15, 2025
Added to TGlist
Mar 15, 2025Linked chat
Covid Truth Network Chat
1.1K
Latest posts in group "Covid Truth Network"
Reposted from:
Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
07.05.202506:09
RFK JR: “Anthony Fauci essentially restarted the bio-weapons arms race under the pretention of developing vaccines…eventually moving his experiments offshore, mainly to the Wuhan Lab. Today, we moved to shut down this kind of research…”
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
06.05.202508:27
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday banning all federal funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in China, Iran and other countries and blocking all federal funding for foreign research that could cause another pandemic.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:
Dr. Simon
04.05.202506:07
🚨COVID WASN’T A COINCIDENCE. IT WAS A SYMPTOM OF A BROKEN SYSTEM.
Let me explain how "science" actually works today.
THROWBACK: There was a time, not long ago, when scientists got hired by universities or research institutes for life. They had true academic freedom. They could set their own hypotheses, freely choose research topics, question established theories, and be as critical as necessary without fear of losing their career.
NOWADAYS: Today, if you're a young and ambitious scientist, everything is different. You only get temporary contracts, typically tied to research projects that last 3 to 4 years and usually have to find your own funding by writing research proposals.
Unfortunately, writing such a proposal today isn't just about good science. It’s about ticking the "right" political boxes:
▪️Gender equality plans
▪️Climate change mitigation
▪️Diversity and inclusion policies
▪️ESG alignment (Environmental, Social, Governance)
▪️SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
Real science isn't enough anymore.
You have to signal political loyalty.
If you're too critical of existing theories, if you dare to question things like the 73 genders narrative, or show skepticism toward the climate dogma, you simply won't get funding. And even if you manage to get funding, if your findings don't align with the Green Deal framework or the gender narrative, it will be the last grant you’ll ever see.
And what’s even worse: you may never work in academia again. Most of my former colleagues, for instance, now view me as a traitor, except for one, who sent me a long email expressing his admiration for the courage I showed, a courage he admitted he himself did not have.
I am no longer invited to join scientific consortia.
My career as an institutional scientist is over.
I have come to accept this reality, and over time, I have made my peace with it.
But my story is not just personal. It’s part of a much bigger, and growing, danger for society. Because the scientists who comply today, the ones who "know what to say" to survive, will become the professors who teach your children tomorrow.
The system doesn't promote free thinkers. It rewards obedience.
Everyone who treats science seriously, who dares to question, test, and reject, inevitably gets purged. In the medium and long term, the system produces nothing but brainless minions who see critical thinking as a threat.
A society like that can no longer innovate, it can only obey.
We already saw it during COVID:
▪️"The science is settled."
▪️"Misinformation kills."
▪️"Censorship is necessary to protect public health."
▪️"If you question it, you’re endangering lives."
▪️"We have no time for debate — lives are at stake."
▪️"Your freedom ends where others' health begins."
▪️"Trust the experts."
Those who asked critical questions usually lost their jobs — myself included.
The entire scientific principle of testing hypotheses and trying to reject your own ideas was buried under a mountain of fear, censorship, and politics. Instead of testing reality, COVID "science" relied on speculative models. Models that assumed worst-case scenarios, amplified fear, and justified the largest suspension of human freedoms in modern history.
Garbage data went in, garbage predictions came out, and yet all the so-called experts treated these models as untouchable truth. Not evidence, not observation, yet mathematical speculation was used to shut down societies.
This wasn’t science guiding society. It was fear-driven pseudoscience hijacking it, and it set the stage for something far more dangerous. What I'm talking about is SCIENTISM — an Orwellian religion wearing a lab coat.
A system where questioning power is called "misinformation," and blind loyalty is rewarded as "critical thinking."
SCIENTISM is not real science.
It’s when science is turned into an unquestionable ideology or belief system, treated like a new religion where authorities are worshiped and dissent is forbidden.
Let me explain how "science" actually works today.
THROWBACK: There was a time, not long ago, when scientists got hired by universities or research institutes for life. They had true academic freedom. They could set their own hypotheses, freely choose research topics, question established theories, and be as critical as necessary without fear of losing their career.
NOWADAYS: Today, if you're a young and ambitious scientist, everything is different. You only get temporary contracts, typically tied to research projects that last 3 to 4 years and usually have to find your own funding by writing research proposals.
Unfortunately, writing such a proposal today isn't just about good science. It’s about ticking the "right" political boxes:
▪️Gender equality plans
▪️Climate change mitigation
▪️Diversity and inclusion policies
▪️ESG alignment (Environmental, Social, Governance)
▪️SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
Real science isn't enough anymore.
You have to signal political loyalty.
If you're too critical of existing theories, if you dare to question things like the 73 genders narrative, or show skepticism toward the climate dogma, you simply won't get funding. And even if you manage to get funding, if your findings don't align with the Green Deal framework or the gender narrative, it will be the last grant you’ll ever see.
And what’s even worse: you may never work in academia again. Most of my former colleagues, for instance, now view me as a traitor, except for one, who sent me a long email expressing his admiration for the courage I showed, a courage he admitted he himself did not have.
I am no longer invited to join scientific consortia.
My career as an institutional scientist is over.
I have come to accept this reality, and over time, I have made my peace with it.
But my story is not just personal. It’s part of a much bigger, and growing, danger for society. Because the scientists who comply today, the ones who "know what to say" to survive, will become the professors who teach your children tomorrow.
The system doesn't promote free thinkers. It rewards obedience.
Everyone who treats science seriously, who dares to question, test, and reject, inevitably gets purged. In the medium and long term, the system produces nothing but brainless minions who see critical thinking as a threat.
A society like that can no longer innovate, it can only obey.
We already saw it during COVID:
▪️"The science is settled."
▪️"Misinformation kills."
▪️"Censorship is necessary to protect public health."
▪️"If you question it, you’re endangering lives."
▪️"We have no time for debate — lives are at stake."
▪️"Your freedom ends where others' health begins."
▪️"Trust the experts."
Those who asked critical questions usually lost their jobs — myself included.
The entire scientific principle of testing hypotheses and trying to reject your own ideas was buried under a mountain of fear, censorship, and politics. Instead of testing reality, COVID "science" relied on speculative models. Models that assumed worst-case scenarios, amplified fear, and justified the largest suspension of human freedoms in modern history.
Garbage data went in, garbage predictions came out, and yet all the so-called experts treated these models as untouchable truth. Not evidence, not observation, yet mathematical speculation was used to shut down societies.
This wasn’t science guiding society. It was fear-driven pseudoscience hijacking it, and it set the stage for something far more dangerous. What I'm talking about is SCIENTISM — an Orwellian religion wearing a lab coat.
A system where questioning power is called "misinformation," and blind loyalty is rewarded as "critical thinking."
SCIENTISM is not real science.
It’s when science is turned into an unquestionable ideology or belief system, treated like a new religion where authorities are worshiped and dissent is forbidden.
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
02.05.202512:03
Canadian Government Begins Testing Inhaled Covid mRNA 'AeroVax'
"The Canadian government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public.
Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled.
The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients.
The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.
According to researchers, the Canadian government’s Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) has now invested $8 million in taxpayer funding into the AeroVax project as scientists prepare for the next round of clinical tests.
The scientists developing the experimental “Serova” Covid mRNA “vaccine” insist that it will be administered as a nasal spray.
However, the development of inhaled “vaccines” could allow for large numbers of people to be “vaccinated” at once if the AeroVax were sprayed into the atmosphere.
If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent.
Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme."
https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-testing-inhaled-covid-mrna-aerovax/
📱 ROBINMG
"The Canadian government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public.
Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled.
The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients.
The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.
According to researchers, the Canadian government’s Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) has now invested $8 million in taxpayer funding into the AeroVax project as scientists prepare for the next round of clinical tests.
The scientists developing the experimental “Serova” Covid mRNA “vaccine” insist that it will be administered as a nasal spray.
However, the development of inhaled “vaccines” could allow for large numbers of people to be “vaccinated” at once if the AeroVax were sprayed into the atmosphere.
If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent.
Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme."
https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-testing-inhaled-covid-mrna-aerovax/
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
29.04.202504:35
Who said Covid "vaccines" don't work? They work exactly as they were intended to.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202514:10
WHAT DOES BLACKROCK WANT?
"Social problems in substituting humans for machines will be easier in developed countries with declining populations. "
Larry Fink of BlackRock.
Share on X:
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1916856275062739274
📱 ROBINMG
"Social problems in substituting humans for machines will be easier in developed countries with declining populations. "
Larry Fink of BlackRock.
Share on X:
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1916856275062739274
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:52
Warren Buffett participated in the "Good Club" meeting which set the agenda for depopulation:
Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
"The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."
📱 ROBINMG
Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
"The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:51
WHO OWNS BLACKROCK?
Warren Buffett is a main owner of Vanguard/ BlackRock. BlackRock is largely owned by Merrill Lynch who are owned by Bank of America.
Credit: Ian Carroll
📱 ROBINMG
Warren Buffett is a main owner of Vanguard/ BlackRock. BlackRock is largely owned by Merrill Lynch who are owned by Bank of America.
Credit: Ian Carroll
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:51
BlackRock own both Big Pharma and the arms manufacturers producing bombs for both Israel & Ukraine. It is really not difficult to see they drove the Covid19 psyop, the Ukraine war, and the Gaza genocide. The SAME PEOPLE are behind all three because they PROFIT from all three and more.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
25.04.202507:02
Did you know that the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of BioNTech is an advisor to ARIA the agency that wants to dim the Sun in the UK? What an amazing coincidence!
t.me/robinmg/41400
📱 ROBINMG
t.me/robinmg/41400
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
23.04.202517:49
THE AGENDA: "An attempt is under way to collapse liberal democracy and to replace it with global technocracy. "
t.me/robinmg/41379
📱 ROBINMG
t.me/robinmg/41379
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:
Becker News
21.04.202501:49
NEW REPORT: Dr. Anthony Fauci Has Made a Killing After Retirement from 'Public Service'
Newly released records also show a previously unknown scandal about Dr. Anthony Fauci stemming from his so-called "retirement."
https://www.thekylebecker.com/p/dr-anthony-fauci-has-made-a-killing
Newly released records also show a previously unknown scandal about Dr. Anthony Fauci stemming from his so-called "retirement."
https://www.thekylebecker.com/p/dr-anthony-fauci-has-made-a-killing
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
19.04.202506:20
A Foreign Hand in American Silence: Tulsi Releases Biden’s Hidden Censorship Strategy
🇬🇧 Foreign Influence, Domestic Damage
"The most damning revelation? The Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) confirms that the Biden Administration's censorship and surveillance architecture was deeply shaped by foreign-origin strategies, specifically those known to have been advocated by the UK’s Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU).
While the CDU is not explicitly named in the SIP, internal CDC records released through AFL litigation show that U.S. agencies—including the White House, NSC, ODNI, and CDC—were directly briefed by the UK CDU in 2021. These briefings outlined tactics for centralizing censorship, partnering with tech platforms, and using NGOs to suppress dissent—nearly all of which are echoed in the declassified SIP.
The imported methods—psychological manipulation ("nudge units"), domestic disinformation command centers, tech collaboration, and regulatory pressure on speech platforms—have now been codified in federal policy. This means that the U.S. executive branch operated, in part, under a censorship doctrine incubated overseas, coordinated with foreign entities, and turned inward on the American people.
This is not just a policy scandal—it is being compared by many to a modern-day 1776 moment, as the British once again played a covert role in undermining American sovereignty. Only this time, the redcoats didn’t arrive with muskets, but with algorithms, foreign think tanks, and disinformation task forces that infiltrated our executive agencies and influenced the outcome of a U.S. election.
This isn’t speculative. It’s now a matter of record.
We were not imagining it. We were living it.
A Moment of Truth for the Disinformation Dozen
I was one of the twelve (it was actually 13; CCDH miscounted). Labeled. Targeted. Silenced.
Here are the others:
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Ty and Charlene Bollinger
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Rizza Islam
Dr. Rashid Buttar
Erin Elizabeth
Dr. Kelly Brogan
Dr. Christiane Northrup
Dr. Ben Tapper
Kevin Jenkins
Not because we committed a crime. Not because I advocated violence. But because we dared to speak about natural health, bodily sovereignty, and the right to question centralized narratives."
Sayer Ji
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/a-foreign-hand-in-american-silence
📱 ROBINMG
🇬🇧 Foreign Influence, Domestic Damage
"The most damning revelation? The Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) confirms that the Biden Administration's censorship and surveillance architecture was deeply shaped by foreign-origin strategies, specifically those known to have been advocated by the UK’s Counter Disinformation Unit (CDU).
While the CDU is not explicitly named in the SIP, internal CDC records released through AFL litigation show that U.S. agencies—including the White House, NSC, ODNI, and CDC—were directly briefed by the UK CDU in 2021. These briefings outlined tactics for centralizing censorship, partnering with tech platforms, and using NGOs to suppress dissent—nearly all of which are echoed in the declassified SIP.
The imported methods—psychological manipulation ("nudge units"), domestic disinformation command centers, tech collaboration, and regulatory pressure on speech platforms—have now been codified in federal policy. This means that the U.S. executive branch operated, in part, under a censorship doctrine incubated overseas, coordinated with foreign entities, and turned inward on the American people.
This is not just a policy scandal—it is being compared by many to a modern-day 1776 moment, as the British once again played a covert role in undermining American sovereignty. Only this time, the redcoats didn’t arrive with muskets, but with algorithms, foreign think tanks, and disinformation task forces that infiltrated our executive agencies and influenced the outcome of a U.S. election.
This isn’t speculative. It’s now a matter of record.
We were not imagining it. We were living it.
A Moment of Truth for the Disinformation Dozen
I was one of the twelve (it was actually 13; CCDH miscounted). Labeled. Targeted. Silenced.
Here are the others:
Dr. Joseph Mercola
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Ty and Charlene Bollinger
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Rizza Islam
Dr. Rashid Buttar
Erin Elizabeth
Dr. Kelly Brogan
Dr. Christiane Northrup
Dr. Ben Tapper
Kevin Jenkins
Not because we committed a crime. Not because I advocated violence. But because we dared to speak about natural health, bodily sovereignty, and the right to question centralized narratives."
Sayer Ji
https://sayerji.substack.com/p/a-foreign-hand-in-american-silence
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
19.04.202506:10
Finally real mask science returns to the White House. I have been working on this subject since 2020 publishing endless scientific studies on this!
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
18.04.202515:40
Guess who funds the self amplifying RNA shots Trump & Kennedy's FDA just fast tracked?
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Records
14.03.202514:09
75.5KSubscribers15.03.202523:59
100Citation index17.03.202512:55
7.3KAverage views per post17.03.202512:55
7.3KAverage views per ad post24.03.202509:30
12.41%ER17.03.202517:43
9.74%ERRReposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
02.05.202512:03
Canadian Government Begins Testing Inhaled Covid mRNA 'AeroVax'
"The Canadian government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public.
Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled.
The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients.
The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.
According to researchers, the Canadian government’s Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) has now invested $8 million in taxpayer funding into the AeroVax project as scientists prepare for the next round of clinical tests.
The scientists developing the experimental “Serova” Covid mRNA “vaccine” insist that it will be administered as a nasal spray.
However, the development of inhaled “vaccines” could allow for large numbers of people to be “vaccinated” at once if the AeroVax were sprayed into the atmosphere.
If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent.
Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme."
https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-testing-inhaled-covid-mrna-aerovax/
📱 ROBINMG
"The Canadian government has begun ramping up testing for a chilling new Covid mRNA “AeroVax” that seeks to overcome “vaccine hesitancy” by using aerosols to “vaccinate” the general public.
Unlike traditional “vaccines” that are deployed using injections, the new AeroVax is an atomized spray that is inhaled.
The new “vaccines” are sprayed in aerosol form and breathed in by recipients.
The AeroVax was developed by researchers at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation-funded McMaster University in Canada.
According to researchers, the Canadian government’s Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) has now invested $8 million in taxpayer funding into the AeroVax project as scientists prepare for the next round of clinical tests.
The scientists developing the experimental “Serova” Covid mRNA “vaccine” insist that it will be administered as a nasal spray.
However, the development of inhaled “vaccines” could allow for large numbers of people to be “vaccinated” at once if the AeroVax were sprayed into the atmosphere.
If the AeroVax were deployed atmospherically, it could “vaccinate” entire towns and cities at once, bypassing individual consent.
Populations could be “vaccinated” without their knowledge under such a scheme."
https://slaynews.com/news/canadian-government-testing-inhaled-covid-mrna-aerovax/
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
06.05.202508:27
President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Monday banning all federal funding for dangerous gain-of-function research in China, Iran and other countries and blocking all federal funding for foreign research that could cause another pandemic.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:
William Makis MD
16.04.202515:23
BREAKING NEWS: A new COVID-19 Vaccine Myocarditis paper has just been published! 👏
This is the most extensive review and comparison of MYOCARDITIS after COVID-19 Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection ever published!
Conclusion: "We urge governments to remove the COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage"
Let's finally get the toxic COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines off the market!
@WilliamMakis
This is the most extensive review and comparison of MYOCARDITIS after COVID-19 Vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 Infection ever published!
Conclusion: "We urge governments to remove the COVID-19 mRNA products from the market due to the well-documented risk of myocardial damage"
Let's finally get the toxic COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines off the market!
@WilliamMakis
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202514:10
WHAT DOES BLACKROCK WANT?
"Social problems in substituting humans for machines will be easier in developed countries with declining populations. "
Larry Fink of BlackRock.
Share on X:
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1916856275062739274
📱 ROBINMG
"Social problems in substituting humans for machines will be easier in developed countries with declining populations. "
Larry Fink of BlackRock.
Share on X:
https://x.com/robinmonotti/status/1916856275062739274
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
29.04.202504:35
Who said Covid "vaccines" don't work? They work exactly as they were intended to.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
07.05.202506:09
RFK JR: “Anthony Fauci essentially restarted the bio-weapons arms race under the pretention of developing vaccines…eventually moving his experiments offshore, mainly to the Wuhan Lab. Today, we moved to shut down this kind of research…”
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Dr. Simon
04.05.202506:07
🚨COVID WASN’T A COINCIDENCE. IT WAS A SYMPTOM OF A BROKEN SYSTEM.
Let me explain how "science" actually works today.
THROWBACK: There was a time, not long ago, when scientists got hired by universities or research institutes for life. They had true academic freedom. They could set their own hypotheses, freely choose research topics, question established theories, and be as critical as necessary without fear of losing their career.
NOWADAYS: Today, if you're a young and ambitious scientist, everything is different. You only get temporary contracts, typically tied to research projects that last 3 to 4 years and usually have to find your own funding by writing research proposals.
Unfortunately, writing such a proposal today isn't just about good science. It’s about ticking the "right" political boxes:
▪️Gender equality plans
▪️Climate change mitigation
▪️Diversity and inclusion policies
▪️ESG alignment (Environmental, Social, Governance)
▪️SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
Real science isn't enough anymore.
You have to signal political loyalty.
If you're too critical of existing theories, if you dare to question things like the 73 genders narrative, or show skepticism toward the climate dogma, you simply won't get funding. And even if you manage to get funding, if your findings don't align with the Green Deal framework or the gender narrative, it will be the last grant you’ll ever see.
And what’s even worse: you may never work in academia again. Most of my former colleagues, for instance, now view me as a traitor, except for one, who sent me a long email expressing his admiration for the courage I showed, a courage he admitted he himself did not have.
I am no longer invited to join scientific consortia.
My career as an institutional scientist is over.
I have come to accept this reality, and over time, I have made my peace with it.
But my story is not just personal. It’s part of a much bigger, and growing, danger for society. Because the scientists who comply today, the ones who "know what to say" to survive, will become the professors who teach your children tomorrow.
The system doesn't promote free thinkers. It rewards obedience.
Everyone who treats science seriously, who dares to question, test, and reject, inevitably gets purged. In the medium and long term, the system produces nothing but brainless minions who see critical thinking as a threat.
A society like that can no longer innovate, it can only obey.
We already saw it during COVID:
▪️"The science is settled."
▪️"Misinformation kills."
▪️"Censorship is necessary to protect public health."
▪️"If you question it, you’re endangering lives."
▪️"We have no time for debate — lives are at stake."
▪️"Your freedom ends where others' health begins."
▪️"Trust the experts."
Those who asked critical questions usually lost their jobs — myself included.
The entire scientific principle of testing hypotheses and trying to reject your own ideas was buried under a mountain of fear, censorship, and politics. Instead of testing reality, COVID "science" relied on speculative models. Models that assumed worst-case scenarios, amplified fear, and justified the largest suspension of human freedoms in modern history.
Garbage data went in, garbage predictions came out, and yet all the so-called experts treated these models as untouchable truth. Not evidence, not observation, yet mathematical speculation was used to shut down societies.
This wasn’t science guiding society. It was fear-driven pseudoscience hijacking it, and it set the stage for something far more dangerous. What I'm talking about is SCIENTISM — an Orwellian religion wearing a lab coat.
A system where questioning power is called "misinformation," and blind loyalty is rewarded as "critical thinking."
SCIENTISM is not real science.
It’s when science is turned into an unquestionable ideology or belief system, treated like a new religion where authorities are worshiped and dissent is forbidden.
Let me explain how "science" actually works today.
THROWBACK: There was a time, not long ago, when scientists got hired by universities or research institutes for life. They had true academic freedom. They could set their own hypotheses, freely choose research topics, question established theories, and be as critical as necessary without fear of losing their career.
NOWADAYS: Today, if you're a young and ambitious scientist, everything is different. You only get temporary contracts, typically tied to research projects that last 3 to 4 years and usually have to find your own funding by writing research proposals.
Unfortunately, writing such a proposal today isn't just about good science. It’s about ticking the "right" political boxes:
▪️Gender equality plans
▪️Climate change mitigation
▪️Diversity and inclusion policies
▪️ESG alignment (Environmental, Social, Governance)
▪️SDGs (Sustainable Development Goals)
Real science isn't enough anymore.
You have to signal political loyalty.
If you're too critical of existing theories, if you dare to question things like the 73 genders narrative, or show skepticism toward the climate dogma, you simply won't get funding. And even if you manage to get funding, if your findings don't align with the Green Deal framework or the gender narrative, it will be the last grant you’ll ever see.
And what’s even worse: you may never work in academia again. Most of my former colleagues, for instance, now view me as a traitor, except for one, who sent me a long email expressing his admiration for the courage I showed, a courage he admitted he himself did not have.
I am no longer invited to join scientific consortia.
My career as an institutional scientist is over.
I have come to accept this reality, and over time, I have made my peace with it.
But my story is not just personal. It’s part of a much bigger, and growing, danger for society. Because the scientists who comply today, the ones who "know what to say" to survive, will become the professors who teach your children tomorrow.
The system doesn't promote free thinkers. It rewards obedience.
Everyone who treats science seriously, who dares to question, test, and reject, inevitably gets purged. In the medium and long term, the system produces nothing but brainless minions who see critical thinking as a threat.
A society like that can no longer innovate, it can only obey.
We already saw it during COVID:
▪️"The science is settled."
▪️"Misinformation kills."
▪️"Censorship is necessary to protect public health."
▪️"If you question it, you’re endangering lives."
▪️"We have no time for debate — lives are at stake."
▪️"Your freedom ends where others' health begins."
▪️"Trust the experts."
Those who asked critical questions usually lost their jobs — myself included.
The entire scientific principle of testing hypotheses and trying to reject your own ideas was buried under a mountain of fear, censorship, and politics. Instead of testing reality, COVID "science" relied on speculative models. Models that assumed worst-case scenarios, amplified fear, and justified the largest suspension of human freedoms in modern history.
Garbage data went in, garbage predictions came out, and yet all the so-called experts treated these models as untouchable truth. Not evidence, not observation, yet mathematical speculation was used to shut down societies.
This wasn’t science guiding society. It was fear-driven pseudoscience hijacking it, and it set the stage for something far more dangerous. What I'm talking about is SCIENTISM — an Orwellian religion wearing a lab coat.
A system where questioning power is called "misinformation," and blind loyalty is rewarded as "critical thinking."
SCIENTISM is not real science.
It’s when science is turned into an unquestionable ideology or belief system, treated like a new religion where authorities are worshiped and dissent is forbidden.
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:52
Warren Buffett participated in the "Good Club" meeting which set the agenda for depopulation:
Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
"The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."
📱 ROBINMG
Billionaire club in bid to curb overpopulation
"The philanthropists who attended a summit convened on the initiative of Bill Gates, the Microsoft co-founder, discussed joining forces to overcome political and religious obstacles to change.
Described as the Good Club by one insider it included David Rockefeller Jr, the patriarch of America's wealthiest dynasty, Warren Buffett and George Soros, the financiers, Michael Bloomberg, the mayor of New York, and the media moguls Ted Turner and Oprah Winfrey.
They gathered at the home of Sir Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize biochemist and president of the private Rockefeller University, in Manhattan on May 5. The informal afternoon session was so discreet that some of the billionaires' aides were told they were at "security briefings".
Taking their cue from Gates they agreed that overpopulation was a priority."
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
18.04.202515:40
Trump Administration Fast-Tracks Controversial Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccine for H5N1 Bird Flu
"The Trump administration has granted Fast Track designation to a groundbreaking — and controversial — self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine candidate targeting the H5N1 avian influenza virus.
The vaccine, ARCT-2304, developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, is now in Phase 1 trials and has been positioned by federal health authorities as a front-line defense against a potential bird flu pandemic.
The designation, announced April 10, was awarded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in partnership with the Department of Health and Human Services and its Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
The Fast Track designation from the FDA expedites the review of drugs intended for serious or life-threatening conditions that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.
This designation aims to get new treatments to patients faster by encouraging more frequent communication between the FDA and the drug developer and allowing for a rolling review of the application.
Unlike traditional vaccines, the ARCT-2304 candidate uses a self-replicating mRNA platform, meaning the genetic material continues reproducing inside the recipient’s cells to boost production of flu-fighting proteins. Arcturus claims this results in a stronger immune response with smaller doses."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/trump-administration-fast-tracks-controversial-self-amplifying-mrna/
📱 ROBINMG
"The Trump administration has granted Fast Track designation to a groundbreaking — and controversial — self-amplifying mRNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine candidate targeting the H5N1 avian influenza virus.
The vaccine, ARCT-2304, developed by Arcturus Therapeutics, is now in Phase 1 trials and has been positioned by federal health authorities as a front-line defense against a potential bird flu pandemic.
The designation, announced April 10, was awarded by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in partnership with the Department of Health and Human Services and its Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA).
The Fast Track designation from the FDA expedites the review of drugs intended for serious or life-threatening conditions that demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs.
This designation aims to get new treatments to patients faster by encouraging more frequent communication between the FDA and the drug developer and allowing for a rolling review of the application.
Unlike traditional vaccines, the ARCT-2304 candidate uses a self-replicating mRNA platform, meaning the genetic material continues reproducing inside the recipient’s cells to boost production of flu-fighting proteins. Arcturus claims this results in a stronger immune response with smaller doses."
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/trump-administration-fast-tracks-controversial-self-amplifying-mrna/
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:
World Council for Health
18.04.202514:12
💉 "This is Worse Than COVID shots" – and the FDA Just Fast-Tracked It
📌 The self-amplifying RNA threat is real. Understand the implications and take action.
📌 The FDA is fast-tracking self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines, a technology so radical it makes the original COVID shots look like child’s play.
➡️ If you thought mRNA was sketchy, buckle up—saRNA is mRNA on steroids. It doesn’t just deliver genetic instructions; it self-replicates inside a person’s cells, turning their body into a mini-factory for synthetic proteins.
And guess what?
📌 No long-term safety data. No real transparency. Just full-speed ahead.
🌐
Read more:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/this-is-worse-than-covid-shots-and
📌 The self-amplifying RNA threat is real. Understand the implications and take action.
📌 The FDA is fast-tracking self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines, a technology so radical it makes the original COVID shots look like child’s play.
➡️ If you thought mRNA was sketchy, buckle up—saRNA is mRNA on steroids. It doesn’t just deliver genetic instructions; it self-replicates inside a person’s cells, turning their body into a mini-factory for synthetic proteins.
And guess what?
📌 No long-term safety data. No real transparency. Just full-speed ahead.
🌐
Read more:
https://worldcouncilforhealth.substack.com/p/this-is-worse-than-covid-shots-and
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
25.04.202507:02
Did you know that the co-founder and Chief Medical Officer of BioNTech is an advisor to ARIA the agency that wants to dim the Sun in the UK? What an amazing coincidence!
t.me/robinmg/41400
📱 ROBINMG
t.me/robinmg/41400
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:51
WHO OWNS BLACKROCK?
Warren Buffett is a main owner of Vanguard/ BlackRock. BlackRock is largely owned by Merrill Lynch who are owned by Bank of America.
Credit: Ian Carroll
📱 ROBINMG
Warren Buffett is a main owner of Vanguard/ BlackRock. BlackRock is largely owned by Merrill Lynch who are owned by Bank of America.
Credit: Ian Carroll
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
18.04.202515:40
Guess who funds the self amplifying RNA shots Trump & Kennedy's FDA just fast tracked?
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
19.04.202506:10
Finally real mask science returns to the White House. I have been working on this subject since 2020 publishing endless scientific studies on this!
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Reposted from:Robin Monotti ( + Cory Morningstar )
28.04.202508:51
BlackRock own both Big Pharma and the arms manufacturers producing bombs for both Israel & Ukraine. It is really not difficult to see they drove the Covid19 psyop, the Ukraine war, and the Gaza genocide. The SAME PEOPLE are behind all three because they PROFIT from all three and more.
📱 ROBINMG
📱 ROBINMG
Log in to unlock more functionality.