Folkish Worldview
21.04.202522:45
Chad Pastoralist is right. Paganism did not die on conversion, cannot die, will never die.
https://t.me/thechadpastoralist/3103
The preservation of the Eddas is a divine miracle, but they are not the only source. There is enough to reconstruct from folk traditions, which are thinly veiled pagan traditions anyway. And demanding that a Celt or a Balt worship Odin is ambiguously folkish at best. Drink from your own well. It is nowhere near as dry as you've been told.
There is power in showing how Christian history is really just schizophrenic pagan history. A history of confusion, self-doubt, and then renewal—but a glorious history nonetheless. Our history.
The foreign desert cult is a footnote in our history, we are not a footnote in its history.
@folkishworldview
https://t.me/thechadpastoralist/3103
The preservation of the Eddas is a divine miracle, but they are not the only source. There is enough to reconstruct from folk traditions, which are thinly veiled pagan traditions anyway. And demanding that a Celt or a Balt worship Odin is ambiguously folkish at best. Drink from your own well. It is nowhere near as dry as you've been told.
There is power in showing how Christian history is really just schizophrenic pagan history. A history of confusion, self-doubt, and then renewal—but a glorious history nonetheless. Our history.
The foreign desert cult is a footnote in our history, we are not a footnote in its history.
@folkishworldview
19.12.202409:50
Neoplatonists are Christians in togas. "Pagan fundamentalism" is just demanding that you meet even the most basic standards of piety, and not recast myths as something they obviously aren't because you don't like them.
https://t.me/FortissaxIsTyping/2780
https://t.me/FortissaxIsTyping/2780
01.12.202402:41
Christians: paganism is cringe
Not cringe:
Not cringe:
Пераслаў з:
Towards Wewelsburg!
17.10.202401:00
“There is no true piety except filial piety, extended to the ancestors, the lineage and the people. Our departed ancestors were neither spiritually dead nor moved to another world. They are at our side, in an invisible and rustling crowd.” - de Benoist
09.10.202401:46
Platonism has been subject to fatal criticism by folkish pagans lately. The most fatal has been criticism of its allegorical interpretation of the myths.
To be fair to neoplatonism, in its own terms, the gods are not quite allegories, but metaphysical principles which emanate daemons, and these daemons are the traditional gods of European myth. The real gods, what stands behind the allegorical myths, are disembodied minds that interact with the world, and neoplatonism claims to have made them as fundamental as possible to reality. It claims to have salvaged divinity in a world moving away from it.
The error is that mind is always necessarily embodied. Neoplatonism assumes idealism, which is false, and then accuses anyone abandoning idealism of abandoning divinity.
The reverse is the truth: disembodied mind is unreal, and by pushing all divinity on to disembodied mind, when we discover that it is unreal, divinity becomes unreal too. This is why neoplatonism failed and resulted in widespread atheism.
It's also why neoplatonism opened the way for Christianity, which stands upon the same metaphysical foundation, and which has also unsurprisingly resulted in widespread atheism. Only true folkish belief can cure atheism.
@folkishworldview
To be fair to neoplatonism, in its own terms, the gods are not quite allegories, but metaphysical principles which emanate daemons, and these daemons are the traditional gods of European myth. The real gods, what stands behind the allegorical myths, are disembodied minds that interact with the world, and neoplatonism claims to have made them as fundamental as possible to reality. It claims to have salvaged divinity in a world moving away from it.
The error is that mind is always necessarily embodied. Neoplatonism assumes idealism, which is false, and then accuses anyone abandoning idealism of abandoning divinity.
The reverse is the truth: disembodied mind is unreal, and by pushing all divinity on to disembodied mind, when we discover that it is unreal, divinity becomes unreal too. This is why neoplatonism failed and resulted in widespread atheism.
It's also why neoplatonism opened the way for Christianity, which stands upon the same metaphysical foundation, and which has also unsurprisingly resulted in widespread atheism. Only true folkish belief can cure atheism.
@folkishworldview
18.09.202415:54
Proto-Indo-European reconstruction is a dangerous business. It's very easy to draw unsound conclusions from nothing more than wild leaps and rough guesswork.
There are some in the right-wing pagan community who take this way too far. You'll see such wild generalizations as "Lugh = Odin = Zeus = Shiva" etc. It's easy to see things that aren't there.
For example, there's a well known Greek myth of Baucis and Philemon where two gods in disguise visit a town of wicked folk who violate the sacred custom of xenia, refusing to welcome the strangers. Only the good Baucis and Philemon take the strangers in and later only they are spared in a divine flood that wipes out the town. This is very clearly paralleled by the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah where YHVH sends two angels to test the wicked people of Sodom and only Lot welcomes them into his home, after which Sodom is destroyed and Lot is spared.
If you were to apply the Lugh = Odin = etc. approach, you could not ask for a more clear "reconstructed" myth between the "last common ancestor" of the Greeks and Jews, leading you to a putative "Proto-Helleno-Semitic" myth, which is clearly gibberish.
Proto-Indo-European reconstruction is fraught with danger and pitfalls. It should not be bandied about lightly. Seeing people proceed recklessly here, and then claim to be authoritative, is a big red flag.
@folkishworldview
There are some in the right-wing pagan community who take this way too far. You'll see such wild generalizations as "Lugh = Odin = Zeus = Shiva" etc. It's easy to see things that aren't there.
For example, there's a well known Greek myth of Baucis and Philemon where two gods in disguise visit a town of wicked folk who violate the sacred custom of xenia, refusing to welcome the strangers. Only the good Baucis and Philemon take the strangers in and later only they are spared in a divine flood that wipes out the town. This is very clearly paralleled by the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah where YHVH sends two angels to test the wicked people of Sodom and only Lot welcomes them into his home, after which Sodom is destroyed and Lot is spared.
If you were to apply the Lugh = Odin = etc. approach, you could not ask for a more clear "reconstructed" myth between the "last common ancestor" of the Greeks and Jews, leading you to a putative "Proto-Helleno-Semitic" myth, which is clearly gibberish.
Proto-Indo-European reconstruction is fraught with danger and pitfalls. It should not be bandied about lightly. Seeing people proceed recklessly here, and then claim to be authoritative, is a big red flag.
@folkishworldview
01.03.202514:46
Very mask-off moment for Fuentes here.
"I don't think the answer to liberalism, which says fuck your own people, love aliens is to say fuck aliens, only love your own people. It's like, love everybody."
He wants to have it both ways, but you can't.
Folkishness differs from Christianity in that aliens are outside the scope of moral consideration. What's good for them only matters as far as it's good for us that they get it. You can break bread with the alien, but unless you have very good reason, it would be better to give that bread to your cousin.
This is why you can't have folkish Christianity. If you "love everybody", then you love nobody, certainly not your own folk. People are getting wise to this, which is part of why white people are leaving Christianity in droves.
@folkishworldview
"I don't think the answer to liberalism, which says fuck your own people, love aliens is to say fuck aliens, only love your own people. It's like, love everybody."
He wants to have it both ways, but you can't.
Folkishness differs from Christianity in that aliens are outside the scope of moral consideration. What's good for them only matters as far as it's good for us that they get it. You can break bread with the alien, but unless you have very good reason, it would be better to give that bread to your cousin.
This is why you can't have folkish Christianity. If you "love everybody", then you love nobody, certainly not your own folk. People are getting wise to this, which is part of why white people are leaving Christianity in droves.
@folkishworldview
Пераслаў з:
Pagan Revivalism
15.12.202407:34
This post which APTA made is absolutely correct.
Traditional faiths held the legends, and how the blessed Gods were depicted, to be grand. They were songs of memories passed down from one generation to the next. Faiths which built entire civilizations from nothing and shall do so again.
We can see in this post the platonist denigrating the honor of the Gods and the legends saying they're "brutal" and implying the blessed holy Gods as immoral.
The goal of the platonist is not to revere traditional religion. It is to destroy and rewrite traditional religion. To wear the corpse of Paganism masquerading as holier than thou.
These are the same type of people who ironically accuse folkishness of being akin to protestants. But they themselves, in their sycophantic cult, follow their 'Martin Luther' Into rebellion against traditional religion and thus being reformers and revisionists in their own right.
Though they have suffered a critical defeat over the last year, it is wise to remember why we oppose them.
Traditional faiths held the legends, and how the blessed Gods were depicted, to be grand. They were songs of memories passed down from one generation to the next. Faiths which built entire civilizations from nothing and shall do so again.
We can see in this post the platonist denigrating the honor of the Gods and the legends saying they're "brutal" and implying the blessed holy Gods as immoral.
The goal of the platonist is not to revere traditional religion. It is to destroy and rewrite traditional religion. To wear the corpse of Paganism masquerading as holier than thou.
These are the same type of people who ironically accuse folkishness of being akin to protestants. But they themselves, in their sycophantic cult, follow their 'Martin Luther' Into rebellion against traditional religion and thus being reformers and revisionists in their own right.
Though they have suffered a critical defeat over the last year, it is wise to remember why we oppose them.
03.11.202412:33
Plato's political philosophy is what people point to when they want to make him look based and trad. It certainly isn't the metaphysics. Look, he's against democracy!
But Plato's ideal politics isn't based or traditional at all. Instead of the traditional criterion of monarchy, which is lineage, Plato offers a kind of meritocracy. "Experts should be in charge," he says. "Specifically, philosophers." Plato's ideal state is what we now call "technocracy".
These technocrats are not tied in any way to tradition, nor was Plato himself. He was happy to rewrite all of Greek religion to suit his own personal tastes. "Philosopher-kings should rule" is just the ancient version of "we just need technical experts in charge". But these "adults in the room" have separated themselves from tradition, so they have no epistemic authority. Just like the technical experts of today.
Plato's political philosophy is indistinguishable from today's authoritarian liberalism. It's baffling that anyone thinks they can oppose the current year on Platonist grounds.
@folkishworldview
But Plato's ideal politics isn't based or traditional at all. Instead of the traditional criterion of monarchy, which is lineage, Plato offers a kind of meritocracy. "Experts should be in charge," he says. "Specifically, philosophers." Plato's ideal state is what we now call "technocracy".
These technocrats are not tied in any way to tradition, nor was Plato himself. He was happy to rewrite all of Greek religion to suit his own personal tastes. "Philosopher-kings should rule" is just the ancient version of "we just need technical experts in charge". But these "adults in the room" have separated themselves from tradition, so they have no epistemic authority. Just like the technical experts of today.
Plato's political philosophy is indistinguishable from today's authoritarian liberalism. It's baffling that anyone thinks they can oppose the current year on Platonist grounds.
@folkishworldview
14.10.202417:00
This response completely misses the point of the criticism. It just repeats the same point over again.
https://t.me/occontent/6236
Whether you think people should be lied to for their own good is irrelevant.
The point is that if you go around saying that in public, you are definitely not involved in any initiatic order. Certainly not at any high level. You would be hustled out the door in no time.
Even worse, the implication is that qualification to rule comes from competence, presumably in philosophy. Whereas no traditional society ever worked that way. The traditional qualification to rule is lineage. That is literally the only thing that mattered.
These perennialists are really hard to take seriously. They don't even have a basic grasp of tradition.
@folkishworldview
https://t.me/occontent/6236
Whether you think people should be lied to for their own good is irrelevant.
The point is that if you go around saying that in public, you are definitely not involved in any initiatic order. Certainly not at any high level. You would be hustled out the door in no time.
Even worse, the implication is that qualification to rule comes from competence, presumably in philosophy. Whereas no traditional society ever worked that way. The traditional qualification to rule is lineage. That is literally the only thing that mattered.
These perennialists are really hard to take seriously. They don't even have a basic grasp of tradition.
@folkishworldview
28.09.202412:15
The problem with Fuentes is not that he's Christian, though that is bad enough. His Christianity is clearly a political and ethnic expression, and no more.
The problem with Fuentes is that he's universalist. You can't take your own side when you demand overarching moral neutrality. It's just liberalism, except liberals are two centuries ahead of you on this.
The problem with Fuentes is that he's universalist. You can't take your own side when you demand overarching moral neutrality. It's just liberalism, except liberals are two centuries ahead of you on this.
14.09.202417:12
What absolute garbage:
https://t.me/FolkAppalachia/1108
Germanic heathenry is orthopraxic over orthodox, but without making the primary sources... well, PRIMARY, you're just making things up because they sound cool.
"I do what I want" isn't folkish heathenry, it's secular humanism in a Viking costume.
@folkishworldview
https://t.me/FolkAppalachia/1108
Germanic heathenry is orthopraxic over orthodox, but without making the primary sources... well, PRIMARY, you're just making things up because they sound cool.
"I do what I want" isn't folkish heathenry, it's secular humanism in a Viking costume.
@folkishworldview
25.01.202516:48
20 minutes until William goes live to discuss the epic method, Rydberg, and the genealogy of the gods on the channel Pagan Revivalism. You will definitely want to listen in. There will be a Q and A section from the audience as well.
https://t.me/Pagan_Revivalism?livestream
https://t.me/Pagan_Revivalism?livestream
Пераслаў з:
Irminfolk Odinist Community
14.12.202406:20
Lithuania has recognized Baltic paganism at the state level
On December 12, the Seimas, guided by Article 43 of the Constitution, the Law on Religious Communities and Associations, and taking into account the conclusion of the Ministry of Justice of December 29, 2017, granted state recognition to the ancient Balt religious community " Romuva "
Back in 2019, the Romuva association tried to push such a solution through the Lithuanian Seimas, but the decision was repeatedly postponed and ultimately not supported, primarily for political reasons. Romuva then filed an application with the ECHR, and after consideration in 2021, the court ruled in favor of the community.
Last September, the Seimas again rejected the proposal to grant Romuva state recognition. But on December 12, 2024, the Lithuanian Seimas held a repeat vote on granting Romuva official status. 64 deputies voted for this decision, 8 voted against, and 10 abstained. Now Romuva will receive official state recognition as a religious society.
On December 12, the Seimas, guided by Article 43 of the Constitution, the Law on Religious Communities and Associations, and taking into account the conclusion of the Ministry of Justice of December 29, 2017, granted state recognition to the ancient Balt religious community " Romuva "
Back in 2019, the Romuva association tried to push such a solution through the Lithuanian Seimas, but the decision was repeatedly postponed and ultimately not supported, primarily for political reasons. Romuva then filed an application with the ECHR, and after consideration in 2021, the court ruled in favor of the community.
Last September, the Seimas again rejected the proposal to grant Romuva state recognition. But on December 12, 2024, the Lithuanian Seimas held a repeat vote on granting Romuva official status. 64 deputies voted for this decision, 8 voted against, and 10 abstained. Now Romuva will receive official state recognition as a religious society.
29.10.202413:13
Jonathan Pageau: "You can't win, pagans."
Then why are we even having this conversation? Precisely because we are winning.
https://youtu.be/n_Tzb0R4XlQ?si=ZvvhTlgdHDm95uYS
Then why are we even having this conversation? Precisely because we are winning.
https://youtu.be/n_Tzb0R4XlQ?si=ZvvhTlgdHDm95uYS
13.10.202405:01
I can tell straight away that someone has no direct experience of an esoteric, initiatic tradition when they start talking about how the plebs need to be lied to for their own good.
https://t.me/occontent/6201
No real esoteric tradition frames it this way, and no real esoteric tradition is ever openly dismissive of the folk. Disclosure of inner secrets is always grounds for expulsion from an order. When people start saying things like "aristocrats of the soul know people are too dumb for their own good", they are simply telling you that they have never been initiated into any real tradition, at best into a LARP that some theosophist made up in 1890.
@folkishworldview
https://t.me/occontent/6201
No real esoteric tradition frames it this way, and no real esoteric tradition is ever openly dismissive of the folk. Disclosure of inner secrets is always grounds for expulsion from an order. When people start saying things like "aristocrats of the soul know people are too dumb for their own good", they are simply telling you that they have never been initiated into any real tradition, at best into a LARP that some theosophist made up in 1890.
@folkishworldview
28.09.202411:56
Yes, the essence of the problem is that whites stand for an ideal like "freedom" above their own people.
The essence of the problem is that whites, and whites alone, are no longer folkish.
https://t.me/nickjfuentes/13648
@folkishworldview
The essence of the problem is that whites, and whites alone, are no longer folkish.
https://t.me/nickjfuentes/13648
@folkishworldview
11.09.202416:47
Some of you have perhaps heard of Derek Guy, a mainstream menswear commentator. He doesn't seem like the kind of person who would have a deep folkish take but he does. For sure he's not even aware of it.
His take is that aesthetics are not governed by a set of eternal rules that are innate in our biology or otherwise "natural". Aesthetics are deeply cultural. In fact, they're completely cultural. They have no reference to anything outside of culture.
People see someone with bad fashion sense and they ask Derek to explain what they're doing wrong. Pretty much always, the mistake they're making is to ignore the history of fashion, what cool and influential men have worn in the past. There's nothing inherently "natural" about two colours that clash. They clash because a folk has declared that they clash.
Derek likes to point to "Polo Bear" as the emblem of great style. Polo Bear is always dressed in a way that calls to mind a time and a place. 1980s business casual; preppie ca. 1960s; wrangler on the Western frontier; jock ca. 1990s, etc. What makes these outfits work is not an abstract set of color or material matching principles that are valid in all times and places. What makes them work is that they're historical, and what makes new styles work is that they draw on the deep history of fashion that went before it.
There's no "bottom" to aesthetics, no ideal form that they're imitating. There's just unmoored, incommensurable, and continuous traditions as far back as you can see.
@folkishworldview
His take is that aesthetics are not governed by a set of eternal rules that are innate in our biology or otherwise "natural". Aesthetics are deeply cultural. In fact, they're completely cultural. They have no reference to anything outside of culture.
People see someone with bad fashion sense and they ask Derek to explain what they're doing wrong. Pretty much always, the mistake they're making is to ignore the history of fashion, what cool and influential men have worn in the past. There's nothing inherently "natural" about two colours that clash. They clash because a folk has declared that they clash.
Derek likes to point to "Polo Bear" as the emblem of great style. Polo Bear is always dressed in a way that calls to mind a time and a place. 1980s business casual; preppie ca. 1960s; wrangler on the Western frontier; jock ca. 1990s, etc. What makes these outfits work is not an abstract set of color or material matching principles that are valid in all times and places. What makes them work is that they're historical, and what makes new styles work is that they draw on the deep history of fashion that went before it.
There's no "bottom" to aesthetics, no ideal form that they're imitating. There's just unmoored, incommensurable, and continuous traditions as far back as you can see.
@folkishworldview
28.12.202415:31
For however nutty and schizophrenic Christian Identity is, it's really the only way to square Christianity and even the weakest identitarianism.
They should be applauded for their commitment to folkishness, if not for their basic grasp of reality.
They should be applauded for their commitment to folkishness, if not for their basic grasp of reality.
09.12.202414:32
Christianity is the most perfect and diabolical subversion of Europeans imaginable.
European man worships the immanent. His natural and native religious worldview is a this-worldly veneration of what is here and now. For European man, transcendence is the royal road to atheism. Never in his whole history has transcendence ever led anywhere else but to atheism.
So how to get him to become an atheist? Or what is the same, how to get him to worship the transcendent?
Simple. You tell European man that the highest and most remote god is an actual man. You tell him to worship this god-man, you tell him "he's more than a man, he's the One".
European man does not become an atheist all at once. His deep connection to divinity in the world must be bred out of him over time. But slowly, he comes to think of this world as empty of divinity. He comes to think that divinity lives "somewhere else". It came here, was crucified, and since then, this world has been a "vale of tears". He comes to think that the canon is closed. Slowly he comes to be disenchanted.
Then one day, he realizes that this "other world" is not real. The world in front of him is all there is. Everything that exists is here, and nowhere else. He agrees with his Bronze Age forefathers on this point, but he has been taught to disagree on one crucial point: he sees no divinity in this world.
But even as an atheist, he can't let go of his latent Christianity. So he invents for himself "cultural Christianity". He hopes this will rescue him, he hopes it will bring meaning back into the world. He doesn't realize that this is what drained the world of meaning in the first place.
Christianity is the worst scourge in the history of our folk. We will never be whole until it is destroyed.
@folkishworldview
European man worships the immanent. His natural and native religious worldview is a this-worldly veneration of what is here and now. For European man, transcendence is the royal road to atheism. Never in his whole history has transcendence ever led anywhere else but to atheism.
So how to get him to become an atheist? Or what is the same, how to get him to worship the transcendent?
Simple. You tell European man that the highest and most remote god is an actual man. You tell him to worship this god-man, you tell him "he's more than a man, he's the One".
European man does not become an atheist all at once. His deep connection to divinity in the world must be bred out of him over time. But slowly, he comes to think of this world as empty of divinity. He comes to think that divinity lives "somewhere else". It came here, was crucified, and since then, this world has been a "vale of tears". He comes to think that the canon is closed. Slowly he comes to be disenchanted.
Then one day, he realizes that this "other world" is not real. The world in front of him is all there is. Everything that exists is here, and nowhere else. He agrees with his Bronze Age forefathers on this point, but he has been taught to disagree on one crucial point: he sees no divinity in this world.
But even as an atheist, he can't let go of his latent Christianity. So he invents for himself "cultural Christianity". He hopes this will rescue him, he hopes it will bring meaning back into the world. He doesn't realize that this is what drained the world of meaning in the first place.
Christianity is the worst scourge in the history of our folk. We will never be whole until it is destroyed.
@folkishworldview
27.10.202415:41
When you rationalize divinity, you lose it.
This is one of the common threads that runs between all of the heretical worldviews we critique here. They assume that the world can be rationalized and made fully intelligible. They cannot simply accept that some things are a mystery, they can't be understood even in principle. And so these worldviews have all led to atheism, disenchantment, and nihilism.
The folkish worldview is not just "racism". The folkish worldview is the magical worldview, the world re-enchanted.
@folkishworldview
This is one of the common threads that runs between all of the heretical worldviews we critique here. They assume that the world can be rationalized and made fully intelligible. They cannot simply accept that some things are a mystery, they can't be understood even in principle. And so these worldviews have all led to atheism, disenchantment, and nihilism.
The folkish worldview is not just "racism". The folkish worldview is the magical worldview, the world re-enchanted.
@folkishworldview
Пераслаў з:
The Norrœna Society
12.10.202400:54
The Debate Between Mythic Literalism and Allegorical Interpation:
How did ancient cultures view their gods and myths? From the Greek philosophers and poets like Xenophanes, Plato, and Homer to the Norse sagas and of Odin and Thor, the debate between mythic literalism and allegory is an enduring one. Did the gods truly walk among men, or were these stories meant to convey deeper wisdom?
In this article, I examine different viewpoints on the debate and explore how these ancient cultures may have blended literal belief with symbolic interpretation.
https://norroena.org/mythic-literalism-vs-allegorical-interpretation/
How did ancient cultures view their gods and myths? From the Greek philosophers and poets like Xenophanes, Plato, and Homer to the Norse sagas and of Odin and Thor, the debate between mythic literalism and allegory is an enduring one. Did the gods truly walk among men, or were these stories meant to convey deeper wisdom?
In this article, I examine different viewpoints on the debate and explore how these ancient cultures may have blended literal belief with symbolic interpretation.
https://norroena.org/mythic-literalism-vs-allegorical-interpretation/
Пераслаў з:
Aryan Paganism, Traditions and Art (APTA)
23.09.202401:42
To sum up what’s been pointed out over the last four days
Ancient Greece, weakened by years of war, failed to nip philosophy in the bud. Then christians came and adopted all the talking points of philosophers (chief among them plato). After all, both christians and philosophers were considered atheists by the old law and rightly since they had the same end-goal of bringing down the traditional faith. Later there was some inner strife among philosophers and christians, but it was similar to many inner abrahamic conflicts i.e. a matter of minor details, not the big picture.
There’s more to share on the topic (e.g. Aristotle was an atheist too), but I don’t like the channel spending too much time focused on one thing like that. If you do want more-contact me in the comments.
Ancient Greece, weakened by years of war, failed to nip philosophy in the bud. Then christians came and adopted all the talking points of philosophers (chief among them plato). After all, both christians and philosophers were considered atheists by the old law and rightly since they had the same end-goal of bringing down the traditional faith. Later there was some inner strife among philosophers and christians, but it was similar to many inner abrahamic conflicts i.e. a matter of minor details, not the big picture.
There’s more to share on the topic (e.g. Aristotle was an atheist too), but I don’t like the channel spending too much time focused on one thing like that. If you do want more-contact me in the comments.
Пераслаў з:
Þórr siðr
Не змаглі атрымаць доступ
да медыяконтэнту
да медыяконтэнту
06.09.202401:02
A look at the grove on another property I am in the process of purchasing.
In this grove a new hof will be built and dedicated to Þórr, and here my family will preserve the Þórr siðr for years to come.
Buy land. Build temples. Worship the gods.
This is the real way to secure tradition in the world.
In this grove a new hof will be built and dedicated to Þórr, and here my family will preserve the Þórr siðr for years to come.
Buy land. Build temples. Worship the gods.
This is the real way to secure tradition in the world.
Паказана 1 - 24 з 67
Увайдзіце, каб разблакаваць больш функцый.