ToreSays®+
Tweets and troublesome memes
Рэйтынг TGlist
0
0
ТыпПублічны
Вертыфікацыя
Не вертыфікаваныНадзейнасць
Не надзейныРазмяшчэннеРосія
МоваІншая
Дата стварэння каналаApr 24, 2020
Дадана ў TGlist
May 23, 2024Прыкрепленая група
ToreSays®️ + Chat
21.4K
Рэкорды
11.03.202503:37
53.4KПадпісчыкаў24.09.202423:59
100Індэкс цытавання04.03.202516:29
11.2KАхоп 1 паста04.03.202516:29
11.5KАхоп рэкламнага паста06.09.202423:59
52.78%ER04.03.202516:30
21.00%ERRПераслаў з:
ToreSays®+
05.04.202517:34
Girls asked what I used for my face - I found it on amazon for those that don't have tiktok.
NECK (do not use e-products (light stuff) on it - it will hurt this is like mock micro needling) : https://amzn.to/4j1scOK
This is the wand and jelly cream (i use the jelly cream every other day) https://amzn.to/4c97bjh
This is the glow serum (i use with others) https://amzn.to/3Y3Adux
This is that salmon DNA stuff (https://amzn.to/3DEUpw8)
This isthe amazing foam collagen thing (so good) https://amzn.to/43qvy9N
THIS regrew my hair! IGK https://amzn.to/3DGUsrj
This is the dry hair mask (so good) https://amzn.to/4j2xjhR
This is the most expensive but totally worth it benjamin button serum. That is the ONLY thing I use if I use only one product.
I swear by it but it's expensive. I urge you before investing to go to local cosmetic place that carries it to try it. Once you even try a dot it you will know.
Always ask them for a free facial to try shit - I do. https://amzn.to/3RrByYl
NECK (do not use e-products (light stuff) on it - it will hurt this is like mock micro needling) : https://amzn.to/4j1scOK
This is the wand and jelly cream (i use the jelly cream every other day) https://amzn.to/4c97bjh
This is the glow serum (i use with others) https://amzn.to/3Y3Adux
This is that salmon DNA stuff (https://amzn.to/3DEUpw8)
This isthe amazing foam collagen thing (so good) https://amzn.to/43qvy9N
THIS regrew my hair! IGK https://amzn.to/3DGUsrj
This is the dry hair mask (so good) https://amzn.to/4j2xjhR
This is the most expensive but totally worth it benjamin button serum. That is the ONLY thing I use if I use only one product.
I swear by it but it's expensive. I urge you before investing to go to local cosmetic place that carries it to try it. Once you even try a dot it you will know.
Always ask them for a free facial to try shit - I do. https://amzn.to/3RrByYl
Пераслаў з:
Dot Connecting Anons
Не змаглі атрымаць доступ
да медыяконтэнту
да медыяконтэнту
04.04.202520:23
Show this to your liberal friends.
Democrats Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Bernie Sanders all praising tariffs.
XPOST
Democrats Chuck Schumer, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Bernie Sanders all praising tariffs.
XPOST
Пераслаў з:ToreSays®+
04.04.202521:27
Observe the prominent public figures who hold sway on platforms like X and Telegram those influencers, activists, or public figures steering the digital current and you’ll notice the orchestrated entourages they draw. These aren’t spontaneous admirers; they’re calculated groups, operating with a precision that hints at strategy over serendipity. One tactic, chillingly effective, is known as "loving them to death." These operators envelop their target in a flood of praise, positioning themselves as helpful, indispensable allies, their posts surging with calculated likes from fellow operators to cement their credibility. They build echo chambers that hum with their narrative, amplified by others who rarely question the discourse swayed by the sheen of usefulness and the weight of artificial engagement.
Proximity is their currency. Once close to their target, they don’t stop at speaking for them twisting words, stirring discord, or tying their own questionable acts to the persona they’ve latched onto. They also turn their sights on those genuinely trying to help, intercepting and mishandling information entrusted to them. Authentic supporters those offering real aid or insight find their efforts undermined, their contributions distorted or buried by these interlopers. The sabotage is twofold: compromise the target while neutralizing their true allies, all under the guise of loyalty.
When confronted, these operators don’t retreat quietly. Called out by those rightly disgruntled with the chaos they’ve sown, they hide behind masks projecting a carousel of emotional states as shields. One moment, they’re wounded victims; the next, indignant defenders. These feigned reactions crocodile tears or righteous outrage serve as excuses to deflect accountability, painting their critics as overreactive or unkind. It’s a deliberate ploy, banking on the crowd’s reluctance to challenge someone cloaked in vulnerability or fervor. Yet the truth seeps through: these are actors up to no good, their "help" a Trojan horse for disruption.
History offers a mirror. The FBI’s COINTELPRO program in the ’60s and ’70s didn’t just spy on dissidents it infiltrated them. Agents posed as comrades within groups like the civil rights movement, mishandling plans and sowing mistrust, often targeting genuine organizers to weaken the whole. The CIA’s Operation Mockingbird took a similar tack, embedding operatives in newsrooms to steer narratives while sidelining authentic voices, their influence unquestioned by peers dazzled by proximity. The KGB’s Cold War "active measures" refined this further agents cozied up to Western figures, sabotaging sincere allies with disinformation while their "support" went unchallenged, propped up by carefully staged credibility.
Today’s digital operators echo these moves. On X and Telegram, you’ll see them accounts in lockstep, their devotion too polished, their engagement too convenient. When exposed, they lean on the Milgram experiment’s lesson: people hesitate to question perceived legitimacy, especially when it’s wrapped in emotional theater. Accountability? It evaporates blame shifts to "the platform," "the vibe," or the target themselves. Dodging responsibility with vague denials, feels eerily apt modern operators seed chaos, watch it spread, and slip away as the crowd debates the fallout.
Whispers of "networks" or "handlers" often take the blame, but the real artistry lies with these operators amplified by likes, shielded by proximity, and masked by crocodile tears. They profile their audience as too distracted, too softened by their helpful facade, to see the pattern: rehearsed loyalty, targeted sabotage of the genuine, and emotional sleight of hand when the mask slips. Intelligence ops thrived on exploiting trust; this is their legacy. The signs coordinated amplification, mishandled trust, projected excuses are stark for those who look. Seeing through it is the first crack in their script.
https://x.com/idontexisttore/status/1908148677043949660
Proximity is their currency. Once close to their target, they don’t stop at speaking for them twisting words, stirring discord, or tying their own questionable acts to the persona they’ve latched onto. They also turn their sights on those genuinely trying to help, intercepting and mishandling information entrusted to them. Authentic supporters those offering real aid or insight find their efforts undermined, their contributions distorted or buried by these interlopers. The sabotage is twofold: compromise the target while neutralizing their true allies, all under the guise of loyalty.
When confronted, these operators don’t retreat quietly. Called out by those rightly disgruntled with the chaos they’ve sown, they hide behind masks projecting a carousel of emotional states as shields. One moment, they’re wounded victims; the next, indignant defenders. These feigned reactions crocodile tears or righteous outrage serve as excuses to deflect accountability, painting their critics as overreactive or unkind. It’s a deliberate ploy, banking on the crowd’s reluctance to challenge someone cloaked in vulnerability or fervor. Yet the truth seeps through: these are actors up to no good, their "help" a Trojan horse for disruption.
History offers a mirror. The FBI’s COINTELPRO program in the ’60s and ’70s didn’t just spy on dissidents it infiltrated them. Agents posed as comrades within groups like the civil rights movement, mishandling plans and sowing mistrust, often targeting genuine organizers to weaken the whole. The CIA’s Operation Mockingbird took a similar tack, embedding operatives in newsrooms to steer narratives while sidelining authentic voices, their influence unquestioned by peers dazzled by proximity. The KGB’s Cold War "active measures" refined this further agents cozied up to Western figures, sabotaging sincere allies with disinformation while their "support" went unchallenged, propped up by carefully staged credibility.
Today’s digital operators echo these moves. On X and Telegram, you’ll see them accounts in lockstep, their devotion too polished, their engagement too convenient. When exposed, they lean on the Milgram experiment’s lesson: people hesitate to question perceived legitimacy, especially when it’s wrapped in emotional theater. Accountability? It evaporates blame shifts to "the platform," "the vibe," or the target themselves. Dodging responsibility with vague denials, feels eerily apt modern operators seed chaos, watch it spread, and slip away as the crowd debates the fallout.
Whispers of "networks" or "handlers" often take the blame, but the real artistry lies with these operators amplified by likes, shielded by proximity, and masked by crocodile tears. They profile their audience as too distracted, too softened by their helpful facade, to see the pattern: rehearsed loyalty, targeted sabotage of the genuine, and emotional sleight of hand when the mask slips. Intelligence ops thrived on exploiting trust; this is their legacy. The signs coordinated amplification, mishandled trust, projected excuses are stark for those who look. Seeing through it is the first crack in their script.
https://x.com/idontexisttore/status/1908148677043949660
18.03.202515:30
29.03.202516:00
Увайдзіце, каб разблакаваць больш функцый.
