𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
22.04.202523:16
Jesuit Georgetown University, the CIA’s Spy Factory (Part One)
“If you have ever wondered, ‘where do America’s spies come from?’ the answer is quite possibly the Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) at Georgetown University… the school provides the backbone for the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, State Department, and other organs of the national security state… Yet, with more than two dozen ex-CIA officials among its teaching staff, the school tailors its courses towards producing the next generation of analysts, assassins, coup-plotters and economic hitmen, fast-tracking graduates into the upper echelons of the national security state… The CIA has also quietly funded the SFS, as journalist Will Sommer revealed. The agency, based in Langley, VA, secretly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the department’s work, despite Georgetown insisting on its website that this money came from anonymous donations from individuals. Any number of “how to join the CIA” articles suggest studying at the School of Foreign Service, and the university itself leans into its reputation as a spy factory… This Georgetown-to-Langley pipeline is so well-established that the university even published a guide to applying to the agency on its website, filled with useful lists of dos and don’ts. Meanwhile, the School of Foreign Service offers its students the opportunity to hold one-to-one meetings with CIA recruiters, although it notes that these interviews are reserved for students who are not already in contact with the agency themselves… Leon Panetta, who, in addition to being the agency’s chief, was also Secretary of Defense… added that, throughout his time in the national security state, he was surrounded by Georgetown graduates, describing them as: “Talented, young individuals who have been at my side every day for the last four years, at both the CIA and the Pentagon, and I am deeply grateful for their work on behalf of me and on behalf of the nation. And I’m deeply grateful to Georgetown for training such extraordinary public servants…” Although Georgetown presents the organization as a respectable group defending freedom and advancing liberty, since its founding in 1947, the CIA has repeatedly been implicated in many of the worst modern-era crimes against humanity… Gun- and drug-running are also key parts of the CIA’s repertoire…
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“If you have ever wondered, ‘where do America’s spies come from?’ the answer is quite possibly the Walsh School of Foreign Service (SFS) at Georgetown University… the school provides the backbone for the Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, State Department, and other organs of the national security state… Yet, with more than two dozen ex-CIA officials among its teaching staff, the school tailors its courses towards producing the next generation of analysts, assassins, coup-plotters and economic hitmen, fast-tracking graduates into the upper echelons of the national security state… The CIA has also quietly funded the SFS, as journalist Will Sommer revealed. The agency, based in Langley, VA, secretly donated hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund the department’s work, despite Georgetown insisting on its website that this money came from anonymous donations from individuals. Any number of “how to join the CIA” articles suggest studying at the School of Foreign Service, and the university itself leans into its reputation as a spy factory… This Georgetown-to-Langley pipeline is so well-established that the university even published a guide to applying to the agency on its website, filled with useful lists of dos and don’ts. Meanwhile, the School of Foreign Service offers its students the opportunity to hold one-to-one meetings with CIA recruiters, although it notes that these interviews are reserved for students who are not already in contact with the agency themselves… Leon Panetta, who, in addition to being the agency’s chief, was also Secretary of Defense… added that, throughout his time in the national security state, he was surrounded by Georgetown graduates, describing them as: “Talented, young individuals who have been at my side every day for the last four years, at both the CIA and the Pentagon, and I am deeply grateful for their work on behalf of me and on behalf of the nation. And I’m deeply grateful to Georgetown for training such extraordinary public servants…” Although Georgetown presents the organization as a respectable group defending freedom and advancing liberty, since its founding in 1947, the CIA has repeatedly been implicated in many of the worst modern-era crimes against humanity… Gun- and drug-running are also key parts of the CIA’s repertoire…
-From Georgetown to Langley: The Controversial Connection Between a Prestigious University and the CIA by Alan Macleod, March 15th, 2023, MintPress News, (Mirrored here).
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
07.04.202519:55
Roman Catholicism is Ancient Baal Worship
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
01.04.202501:17
Alex Jones Praises a Jew-Baiting Jesuit
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
23.03.202500:05
The Jewish Fall Guy
The activist and founder of the Citizens’ Committee to Clean Up the Courts, Sherman H. Skolnick writes the following in his 2004 article, “Balanced View of the Popes,” Part Two:
“Over the centuries, Jesuits, hiding behind royal court types with Jewish names, called hofjuden, sought to control if not topple various European monarchs, most of them Catholics. So by Royal Order, Jesuits were banished from Spain, France, and a few other places. Hiding behind others, the Jesuits actually went underground, continuing to plot to control Monarchs. In America, the Jesuits have Hollywood hofjuden as a front. Hollywood angers Christians by not showing films about non-Jewish holocausts. Jesuits also hide behind aristocracy fronts, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, CFR.”
-“Balanced View of the Popes” Part Two, (04/20/2004) by Sherman H. Skolnick.
Furthermore, in Skolnick’s book Overthrow of the American Republic, he states:
“For religious and other reasons, the ultra-right wing wants to blame all the troubles of planet Earth on a 'Jewish conspiracy.’ They point to the great number of mass media types with Jewish surnames. Not pointed out is that these are historically managers not owners, and the non-Jewish owners use Jews as a front to take the heat. Others in the ultra-right point to 'Jewish bankers,’ meaning the Rothschilds, who are not followers of Judaism and are the official bankers and transactors of the Vatican.”
-Overthrow of the American Republic by Sherman H. Skolnick, page 113.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The activist and founder of the Citizens’ Committee to Clean Up the Courts, Sherman H. Skolnick writes the following in his 2004 article, “Balanced View of the Popes,” Part Two:
“Over the centuries, Jesuits, hiding behind royal court types with Jewish names, called hofjuden, sought to control if not topple various European monarchs, most of them Catholics. So by Royal Order, Jesuits were banished from Spain, France, and a few other places. Hiding behind others, the Jesuits actually went underground, continuing to plot to control Monarchs. In America, the Jesuits have Hollywood hofjuden as a front. Hollywood angers Christians by not showing films about non-Jewish holocausts. Jesuits also hide behind aristocracy fronts, such as the Council on Foreign Relations, CFR.”
-“Balanced View of the Popes” Part Two, (04/20/2004) by Sherman H. Skolnick.
Furthermore, in Skolnick’s book Overthrow of the American Republic, he states:
“For religious and other reasons, the ultra-right wing wants to blame all the troubles of planet Earth on a 'Jewish conspiracy.’ They point to the great number of mass media types with Jewish surnames. Not pointed out is that these are historically managers not owners, and the non-Jewish owners use Jews as a front to take the heat. Others in the ultra-right point to 'Jewish bankers,’ meaning the Rothschilds, who are not followers of Judaism and are the official bankers and transactors of the Vatican.”
-Overthrow of the American Republic by Sherman H. Skolnick, page 113.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
13.03.202521:59
Etymologically “Antichrist” = “Vicar of Christ.”
In 1874, a gentleman by the name of Walter Riddall published a book entitled A Simple Demonstration of the Antichrist, Deduced from the Etymological Import of the Word from which I will now quote:
“But what I propose on the present occasion is, to unfold a complete demonstration of the Antichrist, simply out of the etymological import of the name… And first, with reference to the proper force of the particle anti, it is not too much to say, that it is entirely ignored in the popular conception of this great name… every student can verify, that the particle anti, prefixed to any term signifying a function or office to be discharged, denotes either
(1) a representative of the functionary ; or (2) a rival functionary; or (3) both.
The simple force of the particle in such compounds is in the stead of… Thus we have seen that, according to the force of the particle anti in such compounds, the word Antichrist, literally translated, would be either, "vicar of Christ," or "rival of Christ." And it is obvious that the term would receive the richest and highest fulfilment of which it is capable, in the person of one who, while presenting himself as Christ vicar, should constitute himselt His real rival, usurping His prerogatives and intercepting His glory. The word supplanter, perhaps, combines the two ideas more nearly than any other English word… We have also to recognise the fact that the Pope pretends to all these prerogatives, not as the open rival, but as the professed representative and vicegerent of the Christ. One of the proudest titles of the Papacy is "Vicar of Christ." If anything were wanting to complete our exposition, we have it here. This title is, as we have already seen, the very first and most literal translation of the term Antichrist. So that, the Pope being thus at once the rival and the professed representative of the Christ, it becomes apparent that the name Antichrist finds in the Papacy the very highest fulfilment of which it is capable.
-A Simple Demonstration of the Antichrist, Deduced from the Etymological Import of the Word by Walter Riddall pages 6-8, 18.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In 1874, a gentleman by the name of Walter Riddall published a book entitled A Simple Demonstration of the Antichrist, Deduced from the Etymological Import of the Word from which I will now quote:
“But what I propose on the present occasion is, to unfold a complete demonstration of the Antichrist, simply out of the etymological import of the name… And first, with reference to the proper force of the particle anti, it is not too much to say, that it is entirely ignored in the popular conception of this great name… every student can verify, that the particle anti, prefixed to any term signifying a function or office to be discharged, denotes either
(1) a representative of the functionary ; or (2) a rival functionary; or (3) both.
The simple force of the particle in such compounds is in the stead of… Thus we have seen that, according to the force of the particle anti in such compounds, the word Antichrist, literally translated, would be either, "vicar of Christ," or "rival of Christ." And it is obvious that the term would receive the richest and highest fulfilment of which it is capable, in the person of one who, while presenting himself as Christ vicar, should constitute himselt His real rival, usurping His prerogatives and intercepting His glory. The word supplanter, perhaps, combines the two ideas more nearly than any other English word… We have also to recognise the fact that the Pope pretends to all these prerogatives, not as the open rival, but as the professed representative and vicegerent of the Christ. One of the proudest titles of the Papacy is "Vicar of Christ." If anything were wanting to complete our exposition, we have it here. This title is, as we have already seen, the very first and most literal translation of the term Antichrist. So that, the Pope being thus at once the rival and the professed representative of the Christ, it becomes apparent that the name Antichrist finds in the Papacy the very highest fulfilment of which it is capable.
-A Simple Demonstration of the Antichrist, Deduced from the Etymological Import of the Word by Walter Riddall pages 6-8, 18.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
19.04.202516:22
Dr. Ruckman on Ancient Baal Worship (Part 2)
Commenting on 1 Kings 16:29-33, he writes, “In this passage… There is no doubt about what kind of religion this is; it is Baal worship, and is warned against throughout the Bible. Notice ‘the grove’ which Ahab builds; it is forbidden in Deuteronomy 16:21–22. This kind of Baal worship is characterized by little statues set up with groves and bushes growing around them. (My! My! I wonder who would do a thing like that!) In 1 Kings 18, let us mark the other characteristics of this Baal worship. In 1 Kings 18:10, notice that the black robed priests who are called ‘father’ (the prophets of Baal) are in close fellowship with the king and queen. They are primarily a political group. (Elijah is the true prophet in the passage, but he is not in good with ‘the powers that be’ at all.) Vatican Imperialism in the Twentieth Century, by Avro Manhattan, Zondervan Publishing Company, New York, 1964, will show you this relationship that the Catholic Church has with politics… These Baal worshippers (1 Kings 18) were in good with the king and the queen. As ‘priests,’ they were not primarily religious; they were political. Their religion was merely ‘a means to an end.’ Notice that they worship Baal (1 Kings 18:25), and their proof of being ‘the one true church’ is fire coming down from heaven to answer their prayers, supposedly. Baal, then, is the ‘god of fire,’ in most religions the sun god. (Astaroth, in the Old Testament, is the moon goddess, ‘the queen of heaven.’ Where have I heard that before? Then, there is Baal, the god of thunder or the god of fire.) The word ‘Baal’ in English eventually becomes ‘bull.’ In 1 Kings 18:26, we read that the worship services of the Baal worshippers last until 12 o’clock noon… In the text, the priests mutilate themselves to get their prayers answered, they do penance, and they cut themselves to try to get an answer to prayer. (This is a common practice in the Philippines, Spain, and Italy to this day, and it is characteristic of demon possession in Mark 5:1–5.) There can be no doubt in the Bible at all about the identification of Baal worshippers, and we can locate them early in history. They have priests who are called ‘father,’ they worship the sun god on Sunday until 12 o’clock noon, and they wear a particular kind of robe called a ‘vestment’ (2 Kings 10:22). ‘Call now, if there be any that will answer thee; and to which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ Job 5:1. You know how this verse applies. Someone is praying to the ‘saints.’ (Job was written 1,500 years before Christ, and here we have this same group of godless Baal worshippers; so when Job gets into trouble, one of his friends asks Job, ‘To which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ This implies that ancient people did pray to dead saints.) ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight’ Job 15:15. Here, we find that this doctrine of ‘calling on the saints’ is corrected. This is a passage that every Catholic should get a hold of as soon as possible. God puts no trust in His saints. God wouldn’t trust St. Jude or St. Christopher as far as you could kick your house with an arthritic left foot. If He had trusted Simon Peter, He would have been disappointed because Simon Peter cursed and swore. If He had trusted Paul, He would have been disappointed because Paul got out of the will of God by going to Jerusalem. If He had trusted Noah, He would have been disappointed because Noah got drunk. If He had trusted Matthew, Mark, and John, He would have been disappointed because they all forsook Him and fled. If He had put His trust in Joseph, He would have been disappointed because Joseph lied about the cup. And don’t you think for a minute that God Almighty trusts ‘blessed John,’ ‘blessed Mary,’ ‘blessed Joseph,’ or ‘blessed John, the Baptist’ any further than you could throw a freight train. He doesn’t, brother. ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.’”
-The Book of Revelation by Peter Ruckman, 221-224
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Commenting on 1 Kings 16:29-33, he writes, “In this passage… There is no doubt about what kind of religion this is; it is Baal worship, and is warned against throughout the Bible. Notice ‘the grove’ which Ahab builds; it is forbidden in Deuteronomy 16:21–22. This kind of Baal worship is characterized by little statues set up with groves and bushes growing around them. (My! My! I wonder who would do a thing like that!) In 1 Kings 18, let us mark the other characteristics of this Baal worship. In 1 Kings 18:10, notice that the black robed priests who are called ‘father’ (the prophets of Baal) are in close fellowship with the king and queen. They are primarily a political group. (Elijah is the true prophet in the passage, but he is not in good with ‘the powers that be’ at all.) Vatican Imperialism in the Twentieth Century, by Avro Manhattan, Zondervan Publishing Company, New York, 1964, will show you this relationship that the Catholic Church has with politics… These Baal worshippers (1 Kings 18) were in good with the king and the queen. As ‘priests,’ they were not primarily religious; they were political. Their religion was merely ‘a means to an end.’ Notice that they worship Baal (1 Kings 18:25), and their proof of being ‘the one true church’ is fire coming down from heaven to answer their prayers, supposedly. Baal, then, is the ‘god of fire,’ in most religions the sun god. (Astaroth, in the Old Testament, is the moon goddess, ‘the queen of heaven.’ Where have I heard that before? Then, there is Baal, the god of thunder or the god of fire.) The word ‘Baal’ in English eventually becomes ‘bull.’ In 1 Kings 18:26, we read that the worship services of the Baal worshippers last until 12 o’clock noon… In the text, the priests mutilate themselves to get their prayers answered, they do penance, and they cut themselves to try to get an answer to prayer. (This is a common practice in the Philippines, Spain, and Italy to this day, and it is characteristic of demon possession in Mark 5:1–5.) There can be no doubt in the Bible at all about the identification of Baal worshippers, and we can locate them early in history. They have priests who are called ‘father,’ they worship the sun god on Sunday until 12 o’clock noon, and they wear a particular kind of robe called a ‘vestment’ (2 Kings 10:22). ‘Call now, if there be any that will answer thee; and to which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ Job 5:1. You know how this verse applies. Someone is praying to the ‘saints.’ (Job was written 1,500 years before Christ, and here we have this same group of godless Baal worshippers; so when Job gets into trouble, one of his friends asks Job, ‘To which of the saints wilt thou turn?’ This implies that ancient people did pray to dead saints.) ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight’ Job 15:15. Here, we find that this doctrine of ‘calling on the saints’ is corrected. This is a passage that every Catholic should get a hold of as soon as possible. God puts no trust in His saints. God wouldn’t trust St. Jude or St. Christopher as far as you could kick your house with an arthritic left foot. If He had trusted Simon Peter, He would have been disappointed because Simon Peter cursed and swore. If He had trusted Paul, He would have been disappointed because Paul got out of the will of God by going to Jerusalem. If He had trusted Noah, He would have been disappointed because Noah got drunk. If He had trusted Matthew, Mark, and John, He would have been disappointed because they all forsook Him and fled. If He had put His trust in Joseph, He would have been disappointed because Joseph lied about the cup. And don’t you think for a minute that God Almighty trusts ‘blessed John,’ ‘blessed Mary,’ ‘blessed Joseph,’ or ‘blessed John, the Baptist’ any further than you could throw a freight train. He doesn’t, brother. ‘Behold, he putteth no trust in his saints; yea, the heavens are not clean in his sight.’”
-The Book of Revelation by Peter Ruckman, 221-224
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
07.04.202500:38
George W. Bush, America’s First Catholic President? | An Excerpt from Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection
In following extract from Anthony J. Hilder’s Free World Film Works documentary, Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection, Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order Austin Ruse speaks at the third annual Catholic National Prayer Breakfast wherein he states that the Bonesman George W. Bush is “the second Catholic President, maybe the first.” I follow this up with a clip from Bush’s April 11th, 2008 interview with Raymond Arroyo in which he expresses that he sees God in the eyes of Pope Benedict XVI!
¹Part of the initiation into Skull & Bones includes kissing the slippered toe of the Pope!
²Which is in accordance with official Catholic doctrine. Approximately a dozen Popes have publicly declared on record the blasphemy that they are God manifest in the flesh!
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In following extract from Anthony J. Hilder’s Free World Film Works documentary, Skull & Bones - The Catholic Connection, Knight of Malta and Knight of the Equestrian Order Austin Ruse speaks at the third annual Catholic National Prayer Breakfast wherein he states that the Bonesman George W. Bush is “the second Catholic President, maybe the first.” I follow this up with a clip from Bush’s April 11th, 2008 interview with Raymond Arroyo in which he expresses that he sees God in the eyes of Pope Benedict XVI!
¹Part of the initiation into Skull & Bones includes kissing the slippered toe of the Pope!
²Which is in accordance with official Catholic doctrine. Approximately a dozen Popes have publicly declared on record the blasphemy that they are God manifest in the flesh!
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
28.03.202514:08
The Roman Catholic Church & Disney World
In this sermon excerpt from Gary C. Price, he illustrates the absurdity of Roman Catholicism and its remarkable similarities to “the Magic Kingdom” of Disney World.
Mark Pinsky also notes the following:
“Time’s Richard Corliss broached the subject in 1988: ‘Walt’s entertainment edifice was a unique institution—a cathedral of popular culture whose saints were mice and ducks, virgin princesses and lurking sprites, little boys made of wood and little girls lost in wonderland. Virtually every child attended this secular church, took fear and comfort from its doctrines, and finally outgrew it…. For most American children of the past half-century, a Disney cartoon feature was the sacred destination of their first trip to the movies.’ Walt’s credo, Corliss wrote, must have been the Jesuits’: ‘Give me a child before he’s seven, and he will be mine for life.’”
-The Gospel According to Disney; Faith, Trust, and Pixie Dust by Mark Pinksy, page 6.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In this sermon excerpt from Gary C. Price, he illustrates the absurdity of Roman Catholicism and its remarkable similarities to “the Magic Kingdom” of Disney World.
Mark Pinsky also notes the following:
“Time’s Richard Corliss broached the subject in 1988: ‘Walt’s entertainment edifice was a unique institution—a cathedral of popular culture whose saints were mice and ducks, virgin princesses and lurking sprites, little boys made of wood and little girls lost in wonderland. Virtually every child attended this secular church, took fear and comfort from its doctrines, and finally outgrew it…. For most American children of the past half-century, a Disney cartoon feature was the sacred destination of their first trip to the movies.’ Walt’s credo, Corliss wrote, must have been the Jesuits’: ‘Give me a child before he’s seven, and he will be mine for life.’”
-The Gospel According to Disney; Faith, Trust, and Pixie Dust by Mark Pinksy, page 6.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Пераслаў з:
🏴 The Black Douglas 🏴
21.03.202514:46
“Seldom is it mentioned: that the Rothschilds, along with other western bankers and industrialists, financed the rise of Hitler as a bulwark against the Soviets.
The ultra-right wing falsely describes the Rothschilds as “Jewish bankers” when, in fact, the Rothschilds are interwoven with the Catholic Church, and, jointly with the traditional mafia and the American CIA, interlocked with the Vatican Bank, which was pro-Nazi.”
— – Sherman H. Skolnick: “The Rockefellers and the Rothschilds”
The ultra-right wing falsely describes the Rothschilds as “Jewish bankers” when, in fact, the Rothschilds are interwoven with the Catholic Church, and, jointly with the traditional mafia and the American CIA, interlocked with the Vatican Bank, which was pro-Nazi.”
— – Sherman H. Skolnick: “The Rockefellers and the Rothschilds”
07.03.202523:53
Jesuitical Freemasonry and the Noahide Laws
In 1723, James Anderson authored the first edition of The New Book of Constitutions of the Ancient and Honourable Fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons, Containing their History, Charges, Regulations, Etc.
The Constitutions of the Free-Masons was a constitution written for the Premier Grand Lodge of England (aka "The Moderns during the schism of the early 1750s until 1813), to standardize the rituals and practices of Freemasonry among lodges of London and Westminster operating under that Grand Lodge. The constitution laid the foundation of the legend of Hiram Abiff, King Solomon's Master Builder, along with the pyramid style organizational model of Freemasonry.
The first and second editions were written by James Anderson in 1723 and 1738. The section on religion of the 1738 edition refers to the Seven Laws of Noah, which are a list of seven moral imperatives which, according to the Talmud¹, were given by God to Noah as a binding set of laws for all mankind.
The naysayers will say, “but Freemasonry is Jewish!²” I have already demonstrated on numerous occasions that Freemasonry is nothing but a front group of the Jesuits.³ In fact, Robert Anderson himself in his work mentioned above calls Freemasonry “the Catholick Religion,” referring to the universality of the Masonic Cult.
¹See The Pope and his Talmud and The Catholic “Church” and the Talmud.
²This is a common Jesuit talking point that is used to justify their anti-Jewish fury. As a matter of fact, this exact argument was made in the Jesuits’ in their 1890 Civilta Catholica on “The Jewish Question in Europe” and it’s “remedy,” sound familiar?
³See Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos, Royal Arch Masonry an Invention of Jesuits, The Letter G in Masonry Parts 1 & 2, The Jesuit who Brought Masonry to Costa Rica, etc.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In 1723, James Anderson authored the first edition of The New Book of Constitutions of the Ancient and Honourable Fraternity of Free and Accepted Masons, Containing their History, Charges, Regulations, Etc.
The Constitutions of the Free-Masons was a constitution written for the Premier Grand Lodge of England (aka "The Moderns during the schism of the early 1750s until 1813), to standardize the rituals and practices of Freemasonry among lodges of London and Westminster operating under that Grand Lodge. The constitution laid the foundation of the legend of Hiram Abiff, King Solomon's Master Builder, along with the pyramid style organizational model of Freemasonry.
The first and second editions were written by James Anderson in 1723 and 1738. The section on religion of the 1738 edition refers to the Seven Laws of Noah, which are a list of seven moral imperatives which, according to the Talmud¹, were given by God to Noah as a binding set of laws for all mankind.
The naysayers will say, “but Freemasonry is Jewish!²” I have already demonstrated on numerous occasions that Freemasonry is nothing but a front group of the Jesuits.³ In fact, Robert Anderson himself in his work mentioned above calls Freemasonry “the Catholick Religion,” referring to the universality of the Masonic Cult.
¹See The Pope and his Talmud and The Catholic “Church” and the Talmud.
²This is a common Jesuit talking point that is used to justify their anti-Jewish fury. As a matter of fact, this exact argument was made in the Jesuits’ in their 1890 Civilta Catholica on “The Jewish Question in Europe” and it’s “remedy,” sound familiar?
³See Freemasonry: A Poem in Three Cantos, Royal Arch Masonry an Invention of Jesuits, The Letter G in Masonry Parts 1 & 2, The Jesuit who Brought Masonry to Costa Rica, etc.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
04.04.202501:09
Identify the Jesuits | The Simpsons (S33E04)
In this episode clip, Lisa Simpson is tasked with completing a CAPTCHA security test. The test involves identifying specific objects in an array of images. One phase of the test requires Lisa to identify Jesuits, of which she identifies Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Order, Francis Borgia, the third Superior General of the Jesuits, and Pope Francis I, the first overtly Jesuit White Pope.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In this episode clip, Lisa Simpson is tasked with completing a CAPTCHA security test. The test involves identifying specific objects in an array of images. One phase of the test requires Lisa to identify Jesuits, of which she identifies Ignatius Loyola, the founder of the Jesuit Order, Francis Borgia, the third Superior General of the Jesuits, and Pope Francis I, the first overtly Jesuit White Pope.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
27.03.202519:14
The Jedi are the Jesuits of the Star Wars World
In the following excerpt from the 2007 documentary Star Wars: The Legacy Revealed, Newt Gingrich, the Catholic Congressman who spoke at Wheeling Jesuit University¹, states the following concerning the Jedi, “One could argue they are the Jesuits of this world, these are the people who are the truth bearers, who are the priesthood of freedom, and who give their lives in order to stop evil.”
¹Gingrich Talks Presidential Politics at Wheeling Jesuit University.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
In the following excerpt from the 2007 documentary Star Wars: The Legacy Revealed, Newt Gingrich, the Catholic Congressman who spoke at Wheeling Jesuit University¹, states the following concerning the Jedi, “One could argue they are the Jesuits of this world, these are the people who are the truth bearers, who are the priesthood of freedom, and who give their lives in order to stop evil.”
¹Gingrich Talks Presidential Politics at Wheeling Jesuit University.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
18.03.202513:07
“The Jesuits 𝗔𝗥𝗘 the Illuminati!” | Selected Quotations from Bill Cooper
New YT Channel: https://youtu.be/3R4r2Ki6ZGM
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
New YT Channel: https://youtu.be/3R4r2Ki6ZGM
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
11.03.202521:59
Bolshevism, a Jesuit Design
The alternative media is inundated with individuals who constantly portray the Bolshevik Revolution as inherently Jewish. However, the following quotation paints a vastly different picture from the cliched narrative of Bolshevism and Communism being entirely Jewish.
“Bolshevism is not an accident¹. It is not without reason that the Soviet historians open their accounts of Communism with Thomas More²… One of the Soviet writers hails Thomas More as the first Communist 'at the break-up of the feudal order in England…’ The Bolshevist Party… the internal structure of that party is a replica of Loyola's Jesuit Society. Loyola conceived the Church to be in a state of war, and Lenin considered Society to be in a state of war. Loyola built his organization upon the principles of military discipline, of total abnegation on the part of those who joined his society, of an intricate system of espionage from which not even the supreme general was exempt. His teachings of obedience and his hierarchical order are closely reproduced within the Bolshevist Party. The Jesuit ethics of the end justifying the means recur frequently in the catechism of Leninism.”
-Stalin by Isaac Don Levine pages 26-27.
¹Which is the same thing the present Superior General of the Jesuits said concerning the “coronavirus.”
²The Roman Catholic statesman who authored Utopia, a proto-communist manifesto. It is no coincidence that his great-grandson, Henry More who became the Jesuit Provincial of England.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The alternative media is inundated with individuals who constantly portray the Bolshevik Revolution as inherently Jewish. However, the following quotation paints a vastly different picture from the cliched narrative of Bolshevism and Communism being entirely Jewish.
“Bolshevism is not an accident¹. It is not without reason that the Soviet historians open their accounts of Communism with Thomas More²… One of the Soviet writers hails Thomas More as the first Communist 'at the break-up of the feudal order in England…’ The Bolshevist Party… the internal structure of that party is a replica of Loyola's Jesuit Society. Loyola conceived the Church to be in a state of war, and Lenin considered Society to be in a state of war. Loyola built his organization upon the principles of military discipline, of total abnegation on the part of those who joined his society, of an intricate system of espionage from which not even the supreme general was exempt. His teachings of obedience and his hierarchical order are closely reproduced within the Bolshevist Party. The Jesuit ethics of the end justifying the means recur frequently in the catechism of Leninism.”
-Stalin by Isaac Don Levine pages 26-27.
¹Which is the same thing the present Superior General of the Jesuits said concerning the “coronavirus.”
²The Roman Catholic statesman who authored Utopia, a proto-communist manifesto. It is no coincidence that his great-grandson, Henry More who became the Jesuit Provincial of England.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
06.03.202514:57
Pharisaical Jesuitism
Many Christian writers throughout the centuries have observed the many parallels between the Pharisees of the Scriptures and the pernicious ways of the Jesuits. The following quotations do not need any introduction or clarification, they all bear witness to the fact that the same “spirit that worketh now in the children of disobedience” manifested itself in the Pharisees and the Jesuits alike.
“Our Lord himself, in describing the scribes and pharisees in his day, has depicted the Jesuits in the liveliest colours… But we do the scribes and pharisees wrong. Vile and deceitful and wicked as they were, they were purity itself in comparison with the loathsome abominations of the Jesuits. This may seem to be hyperbolical; but we speak honestly and seriously, and in the most measured terms, when we affirm, that wickedness of every kind was never systematically carried to such a state of perfection by any class of men under the sun, in any age of the world, as by the Jesuits. When indeed we contemplate the constitutions, morals, and secret instructions of the Jesuits, we are ready to say, Surely there never can exist any creatures on this earth in human shape, who are so utterly lost to all moral feeling, so utterly destitute of all right feeling, and so filled with all devilishness, as to attempt to carry them out into practical operation. To such I say, come and see the constitutions and pestilent principles of these men in practical operation, and producing the most pernicious effects in the most civilized nations of Europe.”
-The Jesuits by Robert William Overbury pages 158-159¹.
“The most dangerous of men are those who appear very religious, especially when they are organized and in a position of authority. They have the deep respect of the people who are ignorant of their ungodly push for power behind the scenes. These religious men, who pretend to love God, will resort to murder, incite revolution and wars if necessary to help their cause. They are crafty, intelligent, smooth religious politicians who live in a shadowy world of secrets, intrigue, and phony holiness.
This pattern, seen in The Secret History of the Jesuits, spiritually speaking can be seen in the Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees at the time of Jesus Christ. This same evil spirit directed the Roman emperors to issue the ten murderous decrees to persecute the early Christian church.”
-Born Again ex-Jesuit Priest Alberto Rivera in the Introduction to The Secret History of the Jesuits by Edmond Paris page 7.
“Yet from the invectives of Jesus men have concluded that all Pharisees were hypocrites; and the word ‘Pharisee’ has become a synonym for the word ‘Jesuit.’"
-Jesus Christ Before His Ministry by Edmond Stapfer page 95.
“As soon as any doctrine wishes to counterfeit the life it has lost, you find the principle and the element of a sort of Jesuitism as well among the ancients as the moderns. I should not be embarrassed to show that all religion has produced, sooner or later, its Jesuitism, which is nothing but the degeneration of it. Without going out of our tradition, the Pharisees are the Jesuits of Mosaism, as the Jesuits are the Pharisees of Christianity. Did not the Pharisees also doubt the spirit? Did they not ask: What is the spirit? Were they not the furious defenders of the letter? Did not the Christ compare them to sepulchres? Is it not also the comparison which best pleases our own in their constitutions? If all this is true, where is the difference? And if there is no difference, it is the Christ who has pronounced upon them when he cursed the scribes and the doctors of the law.”
-The Jesuits by Jules Michelet pages 155-156.
“And what is Jesuitism but the transmigration of Pharisaism?”
-The Great Interregnum: an Exposition of Daniel and the Apocalypse By James Bonnar page 325.
¹Not only does Overbury state that the Jesuits bear a striking resemblance of the Pharisees, he writes that their unrighteousness exceeds that of the Scribes and Pharisees.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Many Christian writers throughout the centuries have observed the many parallels between the Pharisees of the Scriptures and the pernicious ways of the Jesuits. The following quotations do not need any introduction or clarification, they all bear witness to the fact that the same “spirit that worketh now in the children of disobedience” manifested itself in the Pharisees and the Jesuits alike.
“Our Lord himself, in describing the scribes and pharisees in his day, has depicted the Jesuits in the liveliest colours… But we do the scribes and pharisees wrong. Vile and deceitful and wicked as they were, they were purity itself in comparison with the loathsome abominations of the Jesuits. This may seem to be hyperbolical; but we speak honestly and seriously, and in the most measured terms, when we affirm, that wickedness of every kind was never systematically carried to such a state of perfection by any class of men under the sun, in any age of the world, as by the Jesuits. When indeed we contemplate the constitutions, morals, and secret instructions of the Jesuits, we are ready to say, Surely there never can exist any creatures on this earth in human shape, who are so utterly lost to all moral feeling, so utterly destitute of all right feeling, and so filled with all devilishness, as to attempt to carry them out into practical operation. To such I say, come and see the constitutions and pestilent principles of these men in practical operation, and producing the most pernicious effects in the most civilized nations of Europe.”
-The Jesuits by Robert William Overbury pages 158-159¹.
“The most dangerous of men are those who appear very religious, especially when they are organized and in a position of authority. They have the deep respect of the people who are ignorant of their ungodly push for power behind the scenes. These religious men, who pretend to love God, will resort to murder, incite revolution and wars if necessary to help their cause. They are crafty, intelligent, smooth religious politicians who live in a shadowy world of secrets, intrigue, and phony holiness.
This pattern, seen in The Secret History of the Jesuits, spiritually speaking can be seen in the Scribes, Pharisees and Sadducees at the time of Jesus Christ. This same evil spirit directed the Roman emperors to issue the ten murderous decrees to persecute the early Christian church.”
-Born Again ex-Jesuit Priest Alberto Rivera in the Introduction to The Secret History of the Jesuits by Edmond Paris page 7.
“Yet from the invectives of Jesus men have concluded that all Pharisees were hypocrites; and the word ‘Pharisee’ has become a synonym for the word ‘Jesuit.’"
-Jesus Christ Before His Ministry by Edmond Stapfer page 95.
“As soon as any doctrine wishes to counterfeit the life it has lost, you find the principle and the element of a sort of Jesuitism as well among the ancients as the moderns. I should not be embarrassed to show that all religion has produced, sooner or later, its Jesuitism, which is nothing but the degeneration of it. Without going out of our tradition, the Pharisees are the Jesuits of Mosaism, as the Jesuits are the Pharisees of Christianity. Did not the Pharisees also doubt the spirit? Did they not ask: What is the spirit? Were they not the furious defenders of the letter? Did not the Christ compare them to sepulchres? Is it not also the comparison which best pleases our own in their constitutions? If all this is true, where is the difference? And if there is no difference, it is the Christ who has pronounced upon them when he cursed the scribes and the doctors of the law.”
-The Jesuits by Jules Michelet pages 155-156.
“And what is Jesuitism but the transmigration of Pharisaism?”
-The Great Interregnum: an Exposition of Daniel and the Apocalypse By James Bonnar page 325.
¹Not only does Overbury state that the Jesuits bear a striking resemblance of the Pharisees, he writes that their unrighteousness exceeds that of the Scribes and Pharisees.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
11.04.202500:43
Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA
“The CIA is the best known of the 17 agencies that comprise the American intelligence community. It has earned itself nicknames like ‘Catholic Intelligence Agency’ and ‘Catholics In Action’. It’s worth exploring why. No official statistics exist on Catholics in the CIA or any other American intelligence agency. But one interesting clue is the relatively high number of Catholics who have served as director of the agency… Some of the most influential directors in CIA history have been Catholic – men such as Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby and William Casey. They were not just casual Catholics. They were devout Mass-goers —in many cases, members of groups like the Knights of Malta… To make sense of Catholics in the CIA, you have to go back to the 1940s, before the agency even existed. Until that decade, the United States did not have a unified intelligence system. Separate branches of the military collected and analysed their own intelligence. That changed with the Office of Strategic Services. This was the CIA’s predecessor, responsible for espionage and sabotage operations during World War II. The OSS was founded and led by General William J Donovan, whom history knows as ‘Wild Bill’. Donovan was born into a poor Irish Catholic family in upstate New York… Wild Bill did not exclusively recruit Catholics; he sought anyone with ability… But many Catholics ended up in the OSS… Catholics were more likely to be trusted and accepted within Donovan’s OSS than in other government agencies… From its earliest stages the OSS was involved with the Catholic Church. Surrounded by the Axis powers, the Vatican was an important intelligence source for Donovan and his spy network. Who better to cultivate sources within the Catholic community than Catholics themselves? Donovan already had extensive contacts within the Church. He was friendly with Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York, a dedicated anti-communist. Cardinal Spellman acted as Donovan’s liaison to other Catholics, including an apostolic delegate in Washington who promised intelligence reports from Catholic diplomats in Europe and Japan… The OSS shut down in 1945, but US intelligence and the Catholic Church remained strongly connected… The last OSS veteran to lead the CIA was Bill Casey, who took control in 1981 after managing Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign… One can only guess how many Catholics are in the CIA now. The agency keeps changing. But for all we know it’s still Catholics In Action.”
-Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA by Robert Wargas, The Catholic Herald, May 5th, 2016.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“The CIA is the best known of the 17 agencies that comprise the American intelligence community. It has earned itself nicknames like ‘Catholic Intelligence Agency’ and ‘Catholics In Action’. It’s worth exploring why. No official statistics exist on Catholics in the CIA or any other American intelligence agency. But one interesting clue is the relatively high number of Catholics who have served as director of the agency… Some of the most influential directors in CIA history have been Catholic – men such as Walter Bedell Smith, John McCone, William Colby and William Casey. They were not just casual Catholics. They were devout Mass-goers —in many cases, members of groups like the Knights of Malta… To make sense of Catholics in the CIA, you have to go back to the 1940s, before the agency even existed. Until that decade, the United States did not have a unified intelligence system. Separate branches of the military collected and analysed their own intelligence. That changed with the Office of Strategic Services. This was the CIA’s predecessor, responsible for espionage and sabotage operations during World War II. The OSS was founded and led by General William J Donovan, whom history knows as ‘Wild Bill’. Donovan was born into a poor Irish Catholic family in upstate New York… Wild Bill did not exclusively recruit Catholics; he sought anyone with ability… But many Catholics ended up in the OSS… Catholics were more likely to be trusted and accepted within Donovan’s OSS than in other government agencies… From its earliest stages the OSS was involved with the Catholic Church. Surrounded by the Axis powers, the Vatican was an important intelligence source for Donovan and his spy network. Who better to cultivate sources within the Catholic community than Catholics themselves? Donovan already had extensive contacts within the Church. He was friendly with Cardinal Francis Spellman of New York, a dedicated anti-communist. Cardinal Spellman acted as Donovan’s liaison to other Catholics, including an apostolic delegate in Washington who promised intelligence reports from Catholic diplomats in Europe and Japan… The OSS shut down in 1945, but US intelligence and the Catholic Church remained strongly connected… The last OSS veteran to lead the CIA was Bill Casey, who took control in 1981 after managing Ronald Reagan’s presidential campaign… One can only guess how many Catholics are in the CIA now. The agency keeps changing. But for all we know it’s still Catholics In Action.”
-Why Catholics Thrive in the CIA by Robert Wargas, The Catholic Herald, May 5th, 2016.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
25.03.202514:23
Rudolf Steiner on the Jesuitic-Freemasonic Connection
The compilation was published in the 2nd, significantly expanded edition (1996) of Der Fall Tomberg: Anthroposophie oder Jesuitismus (The Tomberg Case: Anthroposophy or Jesuitism) by Sergei O. Prokofiev and Christian Lazaridès on the 88th anniversary of the death of Rudolf Steiner.
“Although apparently enemies of each other, and engaged in mutual combat, in reality the Jesuit leaders secretly collaborate with the leaders of the Masonic societies. Through this cooperation they have at their disposal a highly effective instrument which best serves the Jesuits' aims.” -Sergei O. Prokofiev
“Secret collaboration and alliance between the Jesuits and the Freemasons for the effective achievement of their aims” (GA 173, 9 December 1916).
-Rudolf Steiner’s Statements on “Jesuitism” (Part One) from the Rudolf Steiner Archive on Patreon.
"the Jesuits have infiltrated, infiltrated into all [Western, Masonic] lodges", especially the higher ones (GA 185, 3 November 1918)
“The Jesuits 'infiltrated' the Masonic lodges from the end of the 18th century 'up to the present day' and occupied the high ranks which they themselves had created. The Jesuits are active in these advanced Masonic lodges. Since then, in these lodges we find mostly ‘pure Jesuitism.’” (GA 198, 3 July 1920)
-Rudolf Steiner’s Statements on “Jesuitsm” (Part Two) from the Rudolf Steiner Archive on Patreon
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The compilation was published in the 2nd, significantly expanded edition (1996) of Der Fall Tomberg: Anthroposophie oder Jesuitismus (The Tomberg Case: Anthroposophy or Jesuitism) by Sergei O. Prokofiev and Christian Lazaridès on the 88th anniversary of the death of Rudolf Steiner.
“Although apparently enemies of each other, and engaged in mutual combat, in reality the Jesuit leaders secretly collaborate with the leaders of the Masonic societies. Through this cooperation they have at their disposal a highly effective instrument which best serves the Jesuits' aims.” -Sergei O. Prokofiev
“Secret collaboration and alliance between the Jesuits and the Freemasons for the effective achievement of their aims” (GA 173, 9 December 1916).
-Rudolf Steiner’s Statements on “Jesuitism” (Part One) from the Rudolf Steiner Archive on Patreon.
"the Jesuits have infiltrated, infiltrated into all [Western, Masonic] lodges", especially the higher ones (GA 185, 3 November 1918)
“The Jesuits 'infiltrated' the Masonic lodges from the end of the 18th century 'up to the present day' and occupied the high ranks which they themselves had created. The Jesuits are active in these advanced Masonic lodges. Since then, in these lodges we find mostly ‘pure Jesuitism.’” (GA 198, 3 July 1920)
-Rudolf Steiner’s Statements on “Jesuitsm” (Part Two) from the Rudolf Steiner Archive on Patreon
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
15.03.202520:04
Popery and Lodgery
Jonathan Blanchard was an American Pastor and the Founder and President of Wheaton College. He was also the Chairman of The National Association of Christians Opposed to Secret Societies as well as a leader in the Anti-Masonic Party. He authored several works including Scotch Rite masonry illustrated: the complete ritual of the ancient and accepted Scottish Rite profusely illustrated in two volumes from which I now quote:
“The twin evils, popery and lodgery… both are unmitigated despotisms—Both set up a false standard of morals ;—and both set aside Christ. Masonry promises to save men by its jugglery, and Popery sends men for salvation, not to Christ, but to a priest. But, how can this be; since, in 1738, Pope Clement XII issued his bull against the Freemasons and its authority continues in force; has been endorsed by Popes since, and enforced by Councils and Priests? Answer—The question is not how it can be, but is it true that the higher degrees of Masonry are of Popish origin? This must be settled by proof. The world knows that James II, a declared Papist, fled to France in 1688, where he died thirteen years afterward. ‘Lenning says, after his flight to France and during his residence at the Jesuit College of Clermont, his adherents, among whom were the Jesuits, fabricated certain degrees with the design of carrying out their political views.’ This is taken from Mackey's Encyclopedia, Article Stuart Masonry, and there is no higher Masonic authority. Another standard Masonic author, (Macoy, Cyc. Art. Scotch Rite) says: ‘The degrees of this Rite are, for the most part, fabricated from the system invented by Ramsay.’ This Ramsay a brilliant young Scotchman, apostatized to Popery. He was twenty years old when James II. fled to France. Ramsay followed him and became tutor to his sons. He became also an ‘instrument of the Jesuits,’ (Rebold Gen. Hist. p. 161,)… Thus it is proved that the first higher degrees of Masonry were invented by French Jesuits and their ‘Instruments.’ And thus is explained ‘how it can be’ that Popery can, at once, prohibit and permit the Lodge. As, with Jesuits, ‘the end sanctifies the means;’ Masonry is right when seeking to enthrone Popery; and wrong when its oaths of secrecy interfere with the Confessional, and its dugs diminish Peter's Pence. But the point is proved, if history can prove anything, ‘that the higher degrees of Masonry;’ so-called, are of Popish origin, invented by Jesuits to destroy Protestantism and popular liberty in Europe.”
-Scotch Rite masonry illustrated: the complete ritual of the ancient and accepted Scottish Rite profusely illustrated, Volume 1 by Jonathan Blanchard pages 60-62.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Jonathan Blanchard was an American Pastor and the Founder and President of Wheaton College. He was also the Chairman of The National Association of Christians Opposed to Secret Societies as well as a leader in the Anti-Masonic Party. He authored several works including Scotch Rite masonry illustrated: the complete ritual of the ancient and accepted Scottish Rite profusely illustrated in two volumes from which I now quote:
“The twin evils, popery and lodgery… both are unmitigated despotisms—Both set up a false standard of morals ;—and both set aside Christ. Masonry promises to save men by its jugglery, and Popery sends men for salvation, not to Christ, but to a priest. But, how can this be; since, in 1738, Pope Clement XII issued his bull against the Freemasons and its authority continues in force; has been endorsed by Popes since, and enforced by Councils and Priests? Answer—The question is not how it can be, but is it true that the higher degrees of Masonry are of Popish origin? This must be settled by proof. The world knows that James II, a declared Papist, fled to France in 1688, where he died thirteen years afterward. ‘Lenning says, after his flight to France and during his residence at the Jesuit College of Clermont, his adherents, among whom were the Jesuits, fabricated certain degrees with the design of carrying out their political views.’ This is taken from Mackey's Encyclopedia, Article Stuart Masonry, and there is no higher Masonic authority. Another standard Masonic author, (Macoy, Cyc. Art. Scotch Rite) says: ‘The degrees of this Rite are, for the most part, fabricated from the system invented by Ramsay.’ This Ramsay a brilliant young Scotchman, apostatized to Popery. He was twenty years old when James II. fled to France. Ramsay followed him and became tutor to his sons. He became also an ‘instrument of the Jesuits,’ (Rebold Gen. Hist. p. 161,)… Thus it is proved that the first higher degrees of Masonry were invented by French Jesuits and their ‘Instruments.’ And thus is explained ‘how it can be’ that Popery can, at once, prohibit and permit the Lodge. As, with Jesuits, ‘the end sanctifies the means;’ Masonry is right when seeking to enthrone Popery; and wrong when its oaths of secrecy interfere with the Confessional, and its dugs diminish Peter's Pence. But the point is proved, if history can prove anything, ‘that the higher degrees of Masonry;’ so-called, are of Popish origin, invented by Jesuits to destroy Protestantism and popular liberty in Europe.”
-Scotch Rite masonry illustrated: the complete ritual of the ancient and accepted Scottish Rite profusely illustrated, Volume 1 by Jonathan Blanchard pages 60-62.
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
10.03.202521:52
Both Political Parties are Under the Feet of the Jesuit -Toronto Mail 1889
The Jesuit order has set up the two-party-system in the United States as the illusion of choice. Regardless of which candidate is elected, Jesuit intrigue will prevail. They have utilized this pattern for ages, as is the case seen below concerning Canadian politics in the late 19th century.
“Let them dismiss the intriguer and the strife will end. The Jesuit is strife incarnate and has been so everywhere and in all times since his career began. He does not come to save souls; he comes to carry on the intrigue to which he has been dedicated from the birth of his order… Still the militia of the sons of Loyola is a mighty organization, and history bears witness that it has done great things. It was a principal agent in keeping up the reign of despotism, as well as of ignorance and superstition, over the greater part of Europe; in rendering hopeless the schism in European Christendom; in filling the world with deadly religious wars; in utterly wrecking the old and happy civilization of Germany; in exterminating the most intelligent, industrious, and moral part of the population of France. It succeeded in arraying the Catholic cantons of Switzerland in arms against the
Protestant cantons, and it may boast that it had its hand in the Franco-German war. It is always strong in the divisions of its enemies. It was strong in the divisions between the Lutherans and the Calvinists in Germany at the time of the Thirty Years' war. It is strong in our political divisions here. On the side of the Jesuit are perfect discipline, unity of purpose, restless activity, inflexibility of will. On the other side are the strife of factions, the political time-serving, the apathy, the tergiversation which we see. Both the political parties are under the feet of the Jesuit, and are alike withheld by their fear of his influence from doing what they must both feel to be their duty to principle aud the country. The rest of us are a mob, and can only utter protests, at present ineflectual, though perhaps they may be made effectual hereafter.”
-ARE WE STIRRING UP RELIGIOUS STRIFE BY OPPOSING THE JESUITS. Toronto Mail, March 9th, 1889. Quoted from United States Congressional serial set, Issue 2712, pg 1104: "Relations with Canada.”
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
The Jesuit order has set up the two-party-system in the United States as the illusion of choice. Regardless of which candidate is elected, Jesuit intrigue will prevail. They have utilized this pattern for ages, as is the case seen below concerning Canadian politics in the late 19th century.
“Let them dismiss the intriguer and the strife will end. The Jesuit is strife incarnate and has been so everywhere and in all times since his career began. He does not come to save souls; he comes to carry on the intrigue to which he has been dedicated from the birth of his order… Still the militia of the sons of Loyola is a mighty organization, and history bears witness that it has done great things. It was a principal agent in keeping up the reign of despotism, as well as of ignorance and superstition, over the greater part of Europe; in rendering hopeless the schism in European Christendom; in filling the world with deadly religious wars; in utterly wrecking the old and happy civilization of Germany; in exterminating the most intelligent, industrious, and moral part of the population of France. It succeeded in arraying the Catholic cantons of Switzerland in arms against the
Protestant cantons, and it may boast that it had its hand in the Franco-German war. It is always strong in the divisions of its enemies. It was strong in the divisions between the Lutherans and the Calvinists in Germany at the time of the Thirty Years' war. It is strong in our political divisions here. On the side of the Jesuit are perfect discipline, unity of purpose, restless activity, inflexibility of will. On the other side are the strife of factions, the political time-serving, the apathy, the tergiversation which we see. Both the political parties are under the feet of the Jesuit, and are alike withheld by their fear of his influence from doing what they must both feel to be their duty to principle aud the country. The rest of us are a mob, and can only utter protests, at present ineflectual, though perhaps they may be made effectual hereafter.”
-ARE WE STIRRING UP RELIGIOUS STRIFE BY OPPOSING THE JESUITS. Toronto Mail, March 9th, 1889. Quoted from United States Congressional serial set, Issue 2712, pg 1104: "Relations with Canada.”
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
04.03.202521:31
Jesuit Rosicrucianism
“A certain J.P.D. a S. published at Brussels in 1619 a work which was reprinted in Prague in 1620 (obviously after the Catholic triumph) entitled Rosa Jesuitica, oder Jesuitische Rotgesellen which adapts rose symbolism to Catholic uses (where of course it naturally belonged, as a symbol of the Virgin) and enquires whether the two Orders, namely that of the Jesuits and that of the Rosicrucians, were not in reality one and the same body, the one having been driven into concealment to emerge later as the other… Yet of all the branches of the Roman Catholic Church it was the Jesuits who were most like the Rosicrucians. The Renaissance esoteric influences behind the formation of the Jesuit Order have not yet been fully studied… We have seen that in the furore the Jesuits tried to draw over Rosicrucian symbolism, suggesting that the two Orders were the same, and manufacturing similar emblematics."
-The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by Frances Yates page 137, 289
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
“A certain J.P.D. a S. published at Brussels in 1619 a work which was reprinted in Prague in 1620 (obviously after the Catholic triumph) entitled Rosa Jesuitica, oder Jesuitische Rotgesellen which adapts rose symbolism to Catholic uses (where of course it naturally belonged, as a symbol of the Virgin) and enquires whether the two Orders, namely that of the Jesuits and that of the Rosicrucians, were not in reality one and the same body, the one having been driven into concealment to emerge later as the other… Yet of all the branches of the Roman Catholic Church it was the Jesuits who were most like the Rosicrucians. The Renaissance esoteric influences behind the formation of the Jesuit Order have not yet been fully studied… We have seen that in the furore the Jesuits tried to draw over Rosicrucian symbolism, suggesting that the two Orders were the same, and manufacturing similar emblematics."
-The Rosicrucian Enlightenment by Frances Yates page 137, 289
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕁𝕖𝕤𝕦𝕚𝕥𝕠𝕔𝕣𝕒𝕔𝕪 𝔼𝕩𝕡𝕠𝕤𝕖𝕕
Паказана 1 - 24 з 110
Увайдзіце, каб разблакаваць больш функцый.