The Irish Inquiry
Рэйтынг TGlist
0
0
ТыпПублічны
Вертыфікацыя
Не вертыфікаваныНадзейнасць
Не надзейныРазмяшчэнне
МоваІншая
Дата стварэння каналаSep 09, 2020
Дадана ў TGlist
May 26, 2024Пераслаў з:
Ben Gilroy
21.02.202512:01
ALERT - Tell the farmers, and boycott all foods contaminated with this. Please share everywhere, it has to be stopped.
06.03.202519:46
Those Wanting War: Did You Know 14 Days Is The Average Time Soldiers Lasted In World War One (Many of Them Were Just Boys)...
Read on below...
Read on below...
Пераслаў з:
Ar Aghaidh
20.02.202510:46
VIEW POINT: The world is now a safer place, the one conflict that always had the potential to turn nuclear is rapidly de escalating. I am of course referring to the Ukraine. Other conflicts that don’t have a nuclear potential are essentially regional conflicts although at a local level human suffering can be enormous. I am referring to Gaza. For peace in any conflict to become possible it is necessary for all negotiators to have good will or at least a vision for peace. When President Trump met President Putin in the Saudi capital of Ryad President Zelensky was deliberately excluded. That was necessary for progress to occur. President Zelensky has escalated this border dispute to a war that at times threatened to go nuclear. He attempted to involve NATO on many occasions fully aware that such a move could lead to a nuclear conflict. There are people who are senior within NATO who have advocated for NATO involvement and there are many senior western politicians who have failed to show appropriate restraint. And of course there are the fools who make noise and punch above their weight to appear to be important. We might know some of them. For a while Zelensky paraded himself on the world stage as the leader of a victim nation without showing any desire to seek compromise. He addressed numerous parliaments including Dáil Éireann. He was almost never challenged while Russia was demonised as the aggressor.
Since the fall of communism the Russian population of the borderlands have been the victims of discrimination by the Ukrainian government. Minorities trapped behind international frontiers have always provided political flashpoints. Sudetenland Germans and the German speaking population of Danzig were the catalyst for WW2. The Russian minority trapped behind the Ukrainian frontier needed to have their concerns listened to. They suffered discrimination and Russia eventually intervened. A simple plebiscite to determine a redrawing of the border was all that was required but that can only happen with an abundance of good will from both sides. The Ukraine choose to play hard ball and that has now backfired. The political landscape has changed, both in Europe and the US. The time has come for peace.
The pathway to peace is straightforward. Currently the Ukraine is under martial law with all elections postponed. Zelensky would have to put himself before the Ukrainian people to continue his mandate. There is a political consensus that he would loose and would be replaced by a government that would seek a just peace. Zelensky as Jewish could avail of the Israeli ‘right of return’ law to emigrate to Israel if he felt he couldn’t remain in the Ukraine. He won’t be without a home. Meanwhile the rest of the Ukraine could build a just peace and move on. The Ukraine can never aspire to NATO membership, to do so is undermining of peace and also must agree to cede to Russia those former parts of the Ukraine that have a Russian majority and that are currently under Russian control. What is important is that any treaty must be embraced equally by both sides. The unjust ‘Treaty of Versailles’ of 1919 and the more unjust Treaty of Trianon’ of 1920 led to WW2. This new treaty must be just to remove any possibility of a future dispute.
Disputes that appear intractable can only be settled when there is strong leadership backed by moral authority. President Trump and President Putin have the ability to formulate a peace plan once such a plan is not shackled to conditions wished for by the EU, NATO or other political and military interests that have no right to scupper the chance of peace. Zelensky’s bottom line appears to be NATO membership but that must never happen as it would allow Zelensky to restart the war at any time in the future in the knowledge that NATO will stand by him. That puts the clock back to the beginning. Fresh Ukrainian elections may well produce a new Ukrainian leader that is pragmatic and such a leader may well work with both Trump and Putin for peace. That would cement peace, the real tragedy is that it took so long.
Since the fall of communism the Russian population of the borderlands have been the victims of discrimination by the Ukrainian government. Minorities trapped behind international frontiers have always provided political flashpoints. Sudetenland Germans and the German speaking population of Danzig were the catalyst for WW2. The Russian minority trapped behind the Ukrainian frontier needed to have their concerns listened to. They suffered discrimination and Russia eventually intervened. A simple plebiscite to determine a redrawing of the border was all that was required but that can only happen with an abundance of good will from both sides. The Ukraine choose to play hard ball and that has now backfired. The political landscape has changed, both in Europe and the US. The time has come for peace.
The pathway to peace is straightforward. Currently the Ukraine is under martial law with all elections postponed. Zelensky would have to put himself before the Ukrainian people to continue his mandate. There is a political consensus that he would loose and would be replaced by a government that would seek a just peace. Zelensky as Jewish could avail of the Israeli ‘right of return’ law to emigrate to Israel if he felt he couldn’t remain in the Ukraine. He won’t be without a home. Meanwhile the rest of the Ukraine could build a just peace and move on. The Ukraine can never aspire to NATO membership, to do so is undermining of peace and also must agree to cede to Russia those former parts of the Ukraine that have a Russian majority and that are currently under Russian control. What is important is that any treaty must be embraced equally by both sides. The unjust ‘Treaty of Versailles’ of 1919 and the more unjust Treaty of Trianon’ of 1920 led to WW2. This new treaty must be just to remove any possibility of a future dispute.
Disputes that appear intractable can only be settled when there is strong leadership backed by moral authority. President Trump and President Putin have the ability to formulate a peace plan once such a plan is not shackled to conditions wished for by the EU, NATO or other political and military interests that have no right to scupper the chance of peace. Zelensky’s bottom line appears to be NATO membership but that must never happen as it would allow Zelensky to restart the war at any time in the future in the knowledge that NATO will stand by him. That puts the clock back to the beginning. Fresh Ukrainian elections may well produce a new Ukrainian leader that is pragmatic and such a leader may well work with both Trump and Putin for peace. That would cement peace, the real tragedy is that it took so long.
Пераслаў з:Ar Aghaidh
22.02.202512:20
VIEW POINT: The purpose of any company is to make money and that may include competing for government contracts. It is not the duty of any company to adapt ‘diversity equity inclusion’ unless it benefits profits by encouraging certain types of people that may have specific skills to join. Because of this politics gets involved to distort the market place for the sake of imposing political goals. In the United States under the Biden administration government contracts were only awarded to companies with strong DEI policies. Now it is the reverse under President Trump, commercial reality has been restored as there is now no incentive for a company to adhere to DEI policies. The ‘executive order’ from the 20th of January referred to DEI as ‘illegal and immoral discriminatory programmes’. There has been an unprecedented rush to ditch the stranglehold of these policies as one corporate organisation after another restores commercial reality into the work place. Google, KPMG, Accenture, Mc Donnell’s, Ford are amongst the big and well known names that have rowed back on their DEI policies. I am getting the impression that they are delighted to do so, no company likes being told how to run its own business. Now we are experiencing real equality, where the best person for a job gets that job regardless of race or colour or any other irrelevant characteristic. All that is now relevant is can you do a good job.
Not everybody is happy. DEI is a lucrative industry worth $9•4 billion and was estimated to grow to $24•4 billion by 2030. This is now unlikely to happen. This industry which contributes nothing in real terms to the economy act as lobbyists to influence governments to implement DEI legislation and then act as policeman to implement and impose changes in the workplace. They have it both ways and steamroll through recruitment policies that ensure that people who are not the right fit for the job get recruited because they are the right fit for DEI policies. But DEI influence does not end there. Within the workforce an atmosphere of fear comes about as employees feel that those recruited under DEI are above scrutiny or criticism. Debate is shut down as employees fear that expressing mere reservation about DEI will be the end of a career. A two speed system exists in the workforce, those that are in a protected category and those who are not. The use of pronouns, the very use of language may determine your advancement within the company. If you are sent for ‘diversity training’ don’t expect debate. You are there to be talked down to as a lesser mortal in need of enlightenment and it is the job of the DEI people to enlighten you.
Those days have abruptly ended in the corporate sector. However in other areas of business and academia DEI may be lingering. Now is the time to challenge it. Armed with the changing business climate in one hand and the Cass Report in the other hand the time has arrived to robustly and loudly articulate against DEI in all of its many forms. Executive Order 14168 issued on the 19th of February stated that it is about ‘defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth….’. This again provides ammunition for those of us who believe in biological reality to reject DEI robustly. This Executive Order then goes on to describe male and female in terms of biological function. Dr Dorothy Fink, Deputy Secretary for Women’s Health stated that ‘biological differences between males and females require sex specific practices in medicine and research to ensure optimal health outcomes’. This is about reclaiming science and banishing ‘woke’. It will become increasingly difficult for any employer or organisation to defend DEI anywhere in the world. In Ireland the strategy of DEI fanatics was to close down debate claiming that decisions have already been made and revisiting the arguments is being hateful. Well not so, the debate is only beginning and the result is predetermined by history and by common sense, DEI is dead, woke is dead and normality and merit will reign supreme. Celebrate!
Not everybody is happy. DEI is a lucrative industry worth $9•4 billion and was estimated to grow to $24•4 billion by 2030. This is now unlikely to happen. This industry which contributes nothing in real terms to the economy act as lobbyists to influence governments to implement DEI legislation and then act as policeman to implement and impose changes in the workplace. They have it both ways and steamroll through recruitment policies that ensure that people who are not the right fit for the job get recruited because they are the right fit for DEI policies. But DEI influence does not end there. Within the workforce an atmosphere of fear comes about as employees feel that those recruited under DEI are above scrutiny or criticism. Debate is shut down as employees fear that expressing mere reservation about DEI will be the end of a career. A two speed system exists in the workforce, those that are in a protected category and those who are not. The use of pronouns, the very use of language may determine your advancement within the company. If you are sent for ‘diversity training’ don’t expect debate. You are there to be talked down to as a lesser mortal in need of enlightenment and it is the job of the DEI people to enlighten you.
Those days have abruptly ended in the corporate sector. However in other areas of business and academia DEI may be lingering. Now is the time to challenge it. Armed with the changing business climate in one hand and the Cass Report in the other hand the time has arrived to robustly and loudly articulate against DEI in all of its many forms. Executive Order 14168 issued on the 19th of February stated that it is about ‘defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth….’. This again provides ammunition for those of us who believe in biological reality to reject DEI robustly. This Executive Order then goes on to describe male and female in terms of biological function. Dr Dorothy Fink, Deputy Secretary for Women’s Health stated that ‘biological differences between males and females require sex specific practices in medicine and research to ensure optimal health outcomes’. This is about reclaiming science and banishing ‘woke’. It will become increasingly difficult for any employer or organisation to defend DEI anywhere in the world. In Ireland the strategy of DEI fanatics was to close down debate claiming that decisions have already been made and revisiting the arguments is being hateful. Well not so, the debate is only beginning and the result is predetermined by history and by common sense, DEI is dead, woke is dead and normality and merit will reign supreme. Celebrate!
Увайдзіце, каб разблакаваць больш функцый.