Red Ideologies
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
12.01.202512:04
List of quotes from Goebbels proving he was a hardcore Marxist-socialist.
Full article
Full article
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
25.11.202415:37
Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
02.11.202419:11
Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands of cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands of cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Қайта жіберілді:
Martinez Politix
18.10.202411:24
The only and main critique that the Nazis leveled at Marx and Marxism was its "denial of the personality principle" or the "race principle" and simply that Marx was "a Jew", deceptively ignoring the similarity of his own views on Jews with theirs. Rarely, if ever, did they critique Marxism on economic grounds and, in the case of Goebbels, asserted that Marx was right in his critique of capitalism:
"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
Қайта жіберілді:Martinez Politix
05.10.202412:47
Franco was absolutely based for keeping Spain out of Hitler's wars of aggression.
As you can see with that article, Franco knew about the Nazis' extreme Nordicist predilections and that they thus viewed Spaniards as inferiors to be used and discarded like cattle.
The Blue Division - who were brave and capable soldiers - got duped into fighting in a war they thought was against Soviet Communism, but was in reality nothing more than Germanic territorial expansionism to implement a competing version of Communism with Germans at the helm of it.
Mussolini the buffoon put himself completely at the mercy of a man who viewed him and his people as inferior servants of the "Nordic master race".
As you can see with that article, Franco knew about the Nazis' extreme Nordicist predilections and that they thus viewed Spaniards as inferiors to be used and discarded like cattle.
The Blue Division - who were brave and capable soldiers - got duped into fighting in a war they thought was against Soviet Communism, but was in reality nothing more than Germanic territorial expansionism to implement a competing version of Communism with Germans at the helm of it.
Mussolini the buffoon put himself completely at the mercy of a man who viewed him and his people as inferior servants of the "Nordic master race".
Қайта жіберілді:
Red Ideologies
02.10.202409:39
PraxBen on that "economic miracle" bit we always hear about.
"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"
"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"
"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"
"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"
From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"
Follow @redideologies
"By 1936 the German recovery was no more advanced than that of Britain or the United States"
"Deficit spending was dominated by war preparation"
"Full scale rearmament had begun by 1934 and 70% of government expenditures had gone toward it by 1939"
"The economy recovery of the 1930s was like a balloon. The Nazis tried to fill the balloon with air but they could never tie the knot to keep it stable. The massive short term gain with equally massive long term consequences"
From the booklet "Deficit Spending in the Nazi Recovery"
Follow @redideologies
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
11.12.202412:28
Richard Walther Darré, Reich Minister of Food and Agriculture, called Slavs inferior and advocated confiscating their farms.
@redideologies
@redideologies
Қайта жіберілді:Martinez Politix
21.11.202417:17
According to Holodomor website, these were the main perpetrators of the crime:
Stalin (Georgian, Main Perpetrator)
Molotov (Russian)
Kaganovich (Jewish)
Postyshev (Russian)
Kossior ( Polish)
Chubar (Ukrainian)
Khatavevich (Jewish)
That's five non-Jews and two Jews.
Hardly a single group is responsible for this. Soviet Communists are responsible, period, not the particular background of the perps which were varied.
Stalin (Georgian, Main Perpetrator)
Molotov (Russian)
Kaganovich (Jewish)
Postyshev (Russian)
Kossior ( Polish)
Chubar (Ukrainian)
Khatavevich (Jewish)
That's five non-Jews and two Jews.
Hardly a single group is responsible for this. Soviet Communists are responsible, period, not the particular background of the perps which were varied.
02.11.202412:12
Debunking ZH's "Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940"
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.
“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933
«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.
"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan
“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”
— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)
“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”
— The Wages of Destruction,
Қайта жіберілді:Martinez Politix
18.10.202411:24
Karl Marx was raised Protestant and professed belief in Christ as a youth.
Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."
And this:
"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."
So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.
Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.
More from Marx:
"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."
Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:
"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."
And this:
"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."
So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.
Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.
More from Marx:
"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."
Қайта жіберілді:
옥수수 🌽
04.10.202401:15
Gunther even accuses some British / Irish people for being “swarthy” as he classifies the population of the British Isles into 3 main racial categories: Nordic, Mediterranean, and Alpine based on physical traits. He argues that racial traits vary geographically, with northern Scotland being mostly "pure Nordic" (fair-skinned), while southern England, Wales, and Ireland are darker due to Mediterranean and Alpine influences. Gunther further claims that some regions, like Cornwall and Ireland, show "Semitic" traits from ancient Phoenician contact. He highlights a strong Mediterranean influence in western Ireland, linking the Irish to the Spanish.
Reference: 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙲𝙸𝙰𝙻 𝙴𝙻𝙴𝙼𝙴𝙽𝚃𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝙴𝚄𝚁𝙾𝙿𝙴𝙰𝙽 𝙷𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙾𝚁𝚈 𝚋𝚢 𝙷𝙰𝙽𝚂 𝙶𝚄𝙽𝚃𝙷𝙴𝚁
(2)
Reference: 𝚃𝙷𝙴 𝚁𝙰𝙲𝙸𝙰𝙻 𝙴𝙻𝙴𝙼𝙴𝙽𝚃𝚂 𝙾𝙵 𝙴𝚄𝚁𝙾𝙿𝙴𝙰𝙽 𝙷𝙸𝚂𝚃𝙾𝚁𝚈 𝚋𝚢 𝙷𝙰𝙽𝚂 𝙶𝚄𝙽𝚃𝙷𝙴𝚁
(2)
Қайта жіберілді:Red Ideologies
29.09.202417:25
"In the days that followed, much to the surprise of his lunch guests, Hitler continued to express his regard for Stalin. The Soviet dictator’s life resembled his own, he told them: the Georgian, too, had worked his way up from ‘an unknown man to the leader of a state’."
Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Downfall ( Hans Baur, Ich flog Mächtige dieser Erde, Kempten (Allgäu), 1956, pp. 178f.)
Source: Volker Ullrich, Hitler Downfall ( Hans Baur, Ich flog Mächtige dieser Erde, Kempten (Allgäu), 1956, pp. 178f.)
Қайта жіберілді:Red Ideologies
27.11.202413:32
Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
Қайта жіберілді:Exposing Hitler as Zionist
EH
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
14.11.202413:42
This is a typically how neo Nazis respond to the argument/justification of the Nazis attacking so many European nations. So the Nazis had no choice but to invade European nations because of PROXIMITY (Lol)? Such a great reason to invade.
Қайта жіберілді:Martinez Politix
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
23.10.202420:31
"But but Hitler hatred central banking maaaan"
So what was Hjalmar Schacht's job? 😂
So what was Hjalmar Schacht's job? 😂
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
17.10.202421:53
"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels
"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
"The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels
Қайта жіберілді:Exposing Hitler as Zionist
EH
03.10.202411:25
What most normie-Jews do not realize is that Nazism was the cattle prod used to valet the the Jews of Europe overseas to establish Israel and colonize Palestine. It's also used as the bogeyman to scare the Westernized Jews into becoming Zionists, or simply not assimilating to the host culture.
29.09.202410:54
"So it is perhaps no surprise to us that the leaders who shouted the loudest about marriage, family and women's roles failed to uphold their own rules. Almost all of the Nazi leaders chased women, cheated on their wives, and engaged in illicit relationships, including producing illegitimate children."
@redideologies
@redideologies
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
25.11.202415:37
Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.
@redideologies
02.11.202419:13
Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.
@redideologies
Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық
қол жеткізе алмадық
21.10.202416:19
Old cartoon portraying a communist and Goebbels in agreement
@redideologies
@redideologies
05.10.202421:38
Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."
Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.
@redideologies
Қайта жіберілді:Red Ideologies
02.10.202409:39
By 1940 Hitler was fully convinced that he wanted a fully planned and regimented economy modeled on the Soviet Union.
> Hitler attributed the success of National Socialist economic policy primarily to state control of the economy. From 1940 at the latest, Hitler increasingly became a proponent of the state planned economy – partly because he was convinced of the superiority of the Soviet Union and its economic system. In his monologs to his inner circle (known as “table talks”) on July 27-28, 1941 Hitler said that “A sensible employment of the powers of a nation can only be achieved with a planned economy from above.”
> About two weeks later he said: “As far as the planning of the economy is concerned, we are still very much at the beginning and I imagine it will be something wonderfully nice to build up an encompassing German and European economic order.” The statement that as far as the planning of the economy was concerned one was still at the very beginning is important because it shows that Hitler was not thinking at all of a reduction of state intervention – not even for the time after the war – but, on the contrary, intended to expand the instruments of state control of the economy even further.
Source
Follow @redideologies
> Hitler attributed the success of National Socialist economic policy primarily to state control of the economy. From 1940 at the latest, Hitler increasingly became a proponent of the state planned economy – partly because he was convinced of the superiority of the Soviet Union and its economic system. In his monologs to his inner circle (known as “table talks”) on July 27-28, 1941 Hitler said that “A sensible employment of the powers of a nation can only be achieved with a planned economy from above.”
> About two weeks later he said: “As far as the planning of the economy is concerned, we are still very much at the beginning and I imagine it will be something wonderfully nice to build up an encompassing German and European economic order.” The statement that as far as the planning of the economy was concerned one was still at the very beginning is important because it shows that Hitler was not thinking at all of a reduction of state intervention – not even for the time after the war – but, on the contrary, intended to expand the instruments of state control of the economy even further.
Source
Follow @redideologies
Қайта жіберілді:Red Ideologies
27.09.202414:26
The nazis sought to hide the inflationary side effects of their high spending fiscal policy with price stops. They also fudged the numbers on unemployment to suit propaganda needs.
> "Other economic policies included the self-sufficiency policies of "autarky" which levied high tariffs on agricultural goods and other imports, central planning and the nationalization of key industries, which included banking, steel production, shipbuilding, transportation, education, and more. The results were mixed. Unemployment was enormously reduced through government stimulation policies and fudging on the official numbers-failing to count Jews, opponents, refugees, women who got marriage allowances, and other minorities, while upping the amount of jobs by counting those in labor-service camps, army recruits, and Nazi party apparatchiks. According to Dan P. Silverman in Hitler's Economy, "Unemployment was reduced in Germany from 34 percent or about 6 million people, in January 1933, to 14 percent, or 2.5 million people, in January 1936." This is a good drop in joblessness, but nothing close to what some have argued was full employment. Additionally, real wages had declined by approximately 25% between 1933 and 1938."
> "A host of economic side effects surfaced. After suspending what remain of the gold standard, Nazi Germany pressured its central bank to keep interest rates low and government budget deficits high, causing the economy to overheat and triggering higher prices. By November 1936, the Nazi regime issued a price stop decree that prohibited increases in prices and wages. Despite the fact that more waves of inflation continued to occur, prices were still kept artificially low."
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
> "Other economic policies included the self-sufficiency policies of "autarky" which levied high tariffs on agricultural goods and other imports, central planning and the nationalization of key industries, which included banking, steel production, shipbuilding, transportation, education, and more. The results were mixed. Unemployment was enormously reduced through government stimulation policies and fudging on the official numbers-failing to count Jews, opponents, refugees, women who got marriage allowances, and other minorities, while upping the amount of jobs by counting those in labor-service camps, army recruits, and Nazi party apparatchiks. According to Dan P. Silverman in Hitler's Economy, "Unemployment was reduced in Germany from 34 percent or about 6 million people, in January 1933, to 14 percent, or 2.5 million people, in January 1936." This is a good drop in joblessness, but nothing close to what some have argued was full employment. Additionally, real wages had declined by approximately 25% between 1933 and 1938."
> "A host of economic side effects surfaced. After suspending what remain of the gold standard, Nazi Germany pressured its central bank to keep interest rates low and government budget deficits high, causing the economy to overheat and triggering higher prices. By November 1936, the Nazi regime issued a price stop decree that prohibited increases in prices and wages. Despite the fact that more waves of inflation continued to occur, prices were still kept artificially low."
Source: Killing History
Follow @redideologies
Көрсетілген 1 - 24 арасынан 61
Көбірек мүмкіндіктерді ашу үшін кіріңіз.