Red Ideologies

Documenting the extensive links between Red and Brown ideologies

TGlist рейтингі

ТүріҚоғамдық

Растау

Расталмаған

Сенімділік

Сенімсіз

Орналасқан жері

ТілБасқа

Канал құрылған күніDec 31, 2022

TGlist-ке қосылған күні

Aug 17, 2024

Мен каналдың иесімін

Өзгерістер тарихы

Telegram арнасы Red Ideologies статистикасы

Толығырақ

Жазылушылар

1 249

24 сағат00%Апта00%Ай00%

Дәйексөз индексі

0

Ескертулер0Каналдарда қайта жазылу0Каналдарда ескерту0

1 жазбаның орташа қамтуы

0

12 сағат00%24 сағат00%48 сағат00%

Қатысу деңгейі (ER)

0%

Қайта жазылды0Пікірлер0Реакциялар0

Қамту бойынша қатысу деңгейі (ERR)

0%

24 сағат0%Апта0%Ай0%

1 жарнамалық жазбаның қамтуы

0

1 сағат00%1 – 4 сағат00%4 - 24 сағат00%

Толығырақ

Каналға біздің ботымызды қосып, осы каналдың аудиториясын біліңіз.

24 сағаттағы жазбалар саны

0

Динамика

"Red Ideologies" тобындағы соңғы жазбалар

Барлық жазбалар

Қайта жіберілді:

Martinez Politix

12.01.202517:14

More economic midwittery from Sewell. He's always dropping these incoherent takes on econ like most NatSucks.

So he says Hitler "didn't nationalize enough" while arguing that he and his ideology aren't communists. So if socialist Hitler was not socialist enough, what does that make him if not a commie who wants to nationalize everything?

Then says "they merely banned arms companies from profitting off the war". If a company can't profit, then it's not a private company, it's a state-run enterprise.

Funny how these NatSucks have no issue with the German State profiting off a war Hitler started on false pretenses by looting and sucking dry every country they invaded, but they're irked if some private German businessman makes a profit off a war Hitler started. They hate "profits" except when the state gets them to finance its war of extermination against Slavic nations.

Clown ideology.

12.01.202512:04

List of quotes from Goebbels proving he was a hardcore Marxist-socialist.

Full article

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

11.12.202412:28

Richard Walther Darré, Reich Minister of Food and Agriculture, called Slavs inferior and advocated confiscating their farms.

@redideologies

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

Қайта жіберілді:

Red Ideologies

27.11.202413:32

Hitler sent weapons to the Ethiopian resistance armies fighting against Mussolini's Italy.

"Nazi Germany sent arms and munitions to Ethiopia because it was frustrated over Italian objections to its attempts to integrate Austria. This prolonged the war and sapped Italian resources."

Hitler was a true Third Worldist. He would support black African and Indian struggles against European countries if those countries wouldn't let Hitler do what he wanted in Europe.

@redideologies

25.11.202415:37

Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".

That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.

@redideologies

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

25.11.202415:37

Volkish theorist Guido von List advocated for a pan-Germanic empire with the "ruthless subjection of non-Aryans (non-Germanics".

That's exactly what Hitler attempted to do.

@redideologies

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

Қайта жіберілді:

Martinez Politix

21.11.202417:17

According to Holodomor website, these were the main perpetrators of the crime:

Stalin (Georgian, Main Perpetrator)

Molotov (Russian)

Kaganovich (Jewish)

Postyshev (Russian)

Kossior ( Polish)

Chubar (Ukrainian)

Khatavevich (Jewish)

That's five non-Jews and two Jews.

Hardly a single group is responsible for this. Soviet Communists are responsible, period, not the particular background of the perps which were varied.

Қайта жіберілді:

Exposing Hitler as Zionist

14.11.202413:42

This is a typically how neo Nazis respond to the argument/justification of the Nazis attacking so many European nations. So the Nazis had no choice but to invade European nations because of PROXIMITY (Lol)? Such a great reason to invade.

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

02.11.202419:13

Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.

Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands as cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.

@redideologies

02.11.202419:11

Leon Degrelle had to practically beg Himmler to include Walloons as "Germanic" after being labeled a non-Germanic inferior group.

Himmler only obliged out of political convenience because Degrelle was mobilizing thousands of cannon fodder for Hitler's Lebensraum project.

@redideologies

02.11.202412:12

Debunking ZH's "Hitler's Peace Offers 1933-1940"

At 2:23, ZH quotes Hitler's Reichstag address to demonstrate that Hitler was eager to disarm Germany. It is well known among historians that Hitler merely lied in public addresses; his true intentions are glaringly disclosed in his behind-closed-door remarks, such as the following, which occurred in the same year 1933, well before May.

“The future of Germany depends exclusively and only on the reconstruction of the Wehrmacht. All other tasks must cede precedence to the task of rearmament ... In any case, I [Hitler] take the view that in [the] future in case of conflict between the demands of the Wehrmacht and demands for other purposes, the interests of the Wehrmacht must in every case have priority.”
~ Adolf Hitler
Cabinet Meeting on 9 February 1933

«Curt Liebmann, noted Hitler's words [from the speech Hitler delivered on February 2, 1933] thus: ‘We might fight for new export markets; or we might – and this would be better – conquer new Lebensraum in the east, and Germanise it ruthlessly.’»
~ David Irving, Hitler's War and The War Path.

"Hitler told military leaders in early February 1933, it was pointless trying to boost exports; the only way to a long-term, secure recovery of the German economy was through the conquest of ‘living-space’ in the East, and preparations for this now had to take priority over everything else."
— The Third Reich in Power, Richard J. Evan

“The next 5 years in Germany must be devoted to the rearmament of the German people. Every publicly supported job creation scheme must be judged by the criterion of whether it is necessary from the point of view of the rearmament of the German people. This principle must always and everywhere stand in the foreground.”

— Hitler to his Ministers, 8 February 1933. ( Richard Evans, “The Third Reich in Power”, p 337)

“…rearmament was the overriding and determining force impelling economic policy from the earliest stage. Everything else was sacrificed to it. In the 6 years between January 1933 and the autumn of the Munich crisis, Hitler’s regime raised the share of national output going to the military from less than 1% to almost 20%. Never before had national production been redistributed on this scale or with such speed by a capitalist state in peacetime.”

— The Wages of Destruction,

Қайта жіберілді:

Martinez Politix

23.10.202420:31

"But but Hitler hatred central banking maaaan"

So what was Hjalmar Schacht's job? 😂

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

21.10.202416:19

Old cartoon portraying a communist and Goebbels in agreement

@redideologies

Медиа контентке
қол жеткізе алмадық

Қайта жіберілді:

Martinez Politix

18.10.202411:24

The only and main critique that the Nazis leveled at Marx and Marxism was its "denial of the personality principle" or the "race principle" and simply that Marx was "a Jew", deceptively ignoring the similarity of his own views on Jews with theirs. Rarely, if ever, did they critique Marxism on economic grounds and, in the case of Goebbels, asserted that Marx was right in his critique of capitalism:

"Karl Marx described the causes of capitalist development reasonably correctly. But we [Marxists and National Socialists] are both always and forever right about capitalism. The will to freedom rises up from the collapsing system. It finds its form in fundamentally new ideas: in Bolshevism and National Socialism. Both emerge with the ultimate belief that they will bring freedom to an entire world by overthrowing it. Bolshevism and National Socialism are embodied in two people who lead a purposeful minority in the will to the future: Lenin and Hitler." - Goebbels

"Lenin was the greatest man, second to Hitler. The difference between Communism and the Hitler faith is slight" - Goebbels

Қайта жіберілді:

Martinez Politix

18.10.202411:24

Karl Marx was raised Protestant and professed belief in Christ as a youth.

Marx wrote "On the Jewish Question" and said this:

"Let us consider the actual, worldly Jew – not the Sabbath Jew, as Bauer does, but the everyday Jew.Let us not look for the secret of the Jew in his religion, but let us look for the secret of his religion in the real Jew. What is the secular basis of Judaism? Practical need, self-interest. What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money.Very well then! Emancipation from huckstering and money, consequently from practical, real Judaism, would be the self-emancipation of our time. An organization of society which would abolish the preconditions for huckstering, and therefore the possibility of huckstering, would make the Jew impossible. His religious consciousness would be dissipated like a thin haze in the real, vital air of society. On the other hand, if the Jew recognizes that this practical nature of his is futile and works to abolish it, he extricates himself from his previous development and works for human emancipation as such and turns against the supreme practical expression of human self-estrangement. We recognize in Judaism, therefore, a general anti-social element of the present time, an element which through historical development – to which in this harmful respect the Jews have zealously contributed – has been brought to its present high level, at which it must necessarily begin to disintegrate. In the final analysis, the emancipation of the Jews is the emancipation of mankind from Judaism."

And this:

"Once society has succeeded in abolishing the empirical essence of Judaism – huckstering and its preconditions – the Jew will have become impossible, because his consciousness no longer has an object, because the subjective basis of Judaism, practical need, has been humanized, and because the conflict between man’s individual-sensuous existence and his species-existence has been abolished. The social emancipation of the Jew is the emancipation of society from Judaism."

So Marx called for the abolition of Judaism and Jews as a unique group, so it's very hard for me to believe he was pursuing some tribalist agenda when he despised them. Don't attach the name Marx to these statements and your average Neo-Nazi would be shouting in agreement.

Fredrich Engels, Marx's closest collaborator and co-author of many communist texts, was a non-Jew. Ironically, Engels was notably less anti-Jewish in comparison with Marx and denounced the phenomenon publicly, although he made some private anti-Jewish remarks. How do the J-communism theorists explain that? The non-Jew Engels opposed anti-Semitism publicly, while the Jew Marx supported and contributed to it.

More from Marx:

"In 1845 in The Holy Family Marx claimed that in his articles in the Deutsch-Französische Jahrbücher he had "proved that the task of abolishing the essence of Jewry is in truth the task of abolishing Jewry in civil society, abolishing the inhumanity of today's practice of life, the summit of which is the money system". In 1849 an article in the Neue Rheinische Zeitung, of which Marx was the editor, criticised the notion that Jews living in Prussia's Polish provinces should be regarded as Germans. The article declared that these Jews were "the filthiest of all races". "Neither by speech nor by descent- but only by their greed for profit - can they be looked upon as relatives of the Germans in Frankfurt." Robert Payne has remarked that "this solution of the Jewish question was not very different from Adolf Hitler's, for it involved the liquidation of Judaism"."

Барлық жазбалар